Ownership
Top 10: 12.7%
J1yxV53EmVRmt9RUj6PPufMfdAYUbtgwXCuNYTBTsYzJShareMultiple health signals are weakening.

“There are a few things worth watching before you ape.”
The main evidence in this report
Well Distributed · Top 10: 12.7% (Low Concentration)
Verified from liquidity ownership evidence
Current wallet holdings and historical launch exposure measure different moments. Open the full analysis for funding links, LP protection and source evidence.
Independent token signals. The Rug.Tools verdict stays based on its own analysis.
GMGN counted 25 sniper wallets among the wallets it classified. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
124 wallets tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.
5 known-influencer/KOL wallets currently hold this token according to GMGN. This is market intelligence, not a safety credit.
Fresh Wallets: 1000 · 1000 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
Bot Wallets: 1191 · 1191 wallets are tagged by GMGN as automated/bot wallets. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
Bundler Trading Activity: 18.0% · GMGN independently estimates 18.0% of trading volume is bot-bundled activity. Corroborating signal only — Rug.Tools' native bundle/launch detection remains primary.
Bonding curve complete · 100% progressed
GMGN supplemental: 18.0% bundler trading activity observed independently by GMGN (material corroborating activity). This does not replace or merge with Rug.Tools' native bundle detection above.
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Top 10: 12.7%
0 linked wallets
18.0% bundler activity · GMGNSupplemental
1 LP wallet identified on-chain
Lock / burn protection: see liquidity evidence
Creator wallet unavailable, but GMGN reports historical creator activity
4/6 report modules have resolved evidence.

“There are a few things worth watching before you ape.”
Explore holder analysis, wallet relationships, liquidity evidence, contract history and more.
Left: created or funded this token. Right: holds part of its supply today.
Follow the arrows: who created the token, and where the supply sits today.
Largest individual wallet: 3.0%.
Currently sits at 999 holders. Supply is spread across many wallets (top holder 3.0%). The creator wallet could not be verified.
100.0% of LP tokens are verified locked or burned, so the pool cannot be pulled by the holder.
Source: Pump.fun migration proof (on-chain)
creators or authorities field, so the creator wallet cannot be identified.Wallet-link evidence is incomplete. Missing evidence is not treated as safe.
Incomplete wallet evidence does not lower the overall risk verdict.
No relationship evidence was strong enough to list.
Coverage note: connected-wallet relationships are still loading; combined bundle balances have not been fully verified.
Wallet relationships are one risk category. The overall Rug.Tools verdict can still be High Risk because of contract controls, trading restrictions, liquidity, holder concentration, or other evidence. A dominant holder is a concentration risk; one large wallet alone is not proof that several wallets are connected.
Presentation-only · does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict
Wallets are only listed when they share funding, were funded by the creator, bought near-identical amounts, or bought in the same block. Buying early alone is not enough to be flagged. Confidence rises as more on-chain data becomes available. Cached for 24 hours.
GMGN supplemental: 18.0% bundler trading activity observed independently by GMGN (material corroborating activity). This does not replace or merge with Rug.Tools' native bundle detection above.
This token currently shows very few visible on-chain risk indicators. No single wallet controls a large share of the visible supply.
The largest individual wallet holds 2.97% of the supply, and the top 10 wallets combined hold 12.69%. This means that trading activity from these wallets is unlikely to significantly affect the token price.
A liquidity pool wallet was found on-chain, and it holds 20.10% of the liquidity. This wallet is excluded from the concentration math.
All on-chain metadata is complete, with no fields missing.
This report reflects only publicly available blockchain information and should not be considered financial advice.
Name, symbol, image and description are all present on-chain.
No single wallet dominates the visible supply in the analyzed holder coverage.
Recent trades and participating wallets · Birdeye
Loaded only when requested. No background refresh.
Fees to @dohertyjackk via UsePaid
AQB9…nGQnD1AK…WwM9DjUu…jqjkyB7p…x9TG7KLp…UHFu| # | Type | Wallet | % | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 💧Pump.fun AMM | Pump.fun AMM Pool AQB9…nGQnTrading liquidity, not an individual holder | 20.10% | |
| 2 | 👤Individual | Individual Wallet D1AK…WwM9Rug.Tools could not confidently identify this account | 2.97% | |
| 3 | 👤Individual | Individual Wallet DjUu…jqjkRug.Tools could not confidently identify this account | 1.22% | |
| 4 | 👤Individual | Individual Wallet yB7p…x9TGRug.Tools could not confidently identify this account | 1.20% | |
| 5 | 👤Individual | Individual Wallet 7KLp…UHFuRug.Tools could not confidently identify this account | 1.14% |
Tokens with similar creator, launchpad, wallet activity, or risk signals.