This observed trading pool is less than 24 hours old. Pool creation does not establish the token’s mint age.
GAMBIT
$GAMBITGrtE7xGn3iBk93hhf1zz6i3Wbfv1uDd9unStGVhGpumpShareUse Caution
The main concerns are holder concentration and liquidity.
Saved evidence is out of date and has not been re-verified.

- Observation
1. Holder concentration
16.13%of supply
Held by the top 10 sampled wallets. Separate addresses may share an owner.
- Observation
2. Liquidity and exits
Liquidity: market provider reports 24,445.
Evidence & caveatsFull investigation ↓
Recorded verdict explanation
The token is actively trading, but sampled holder accounts hold 16.1% of supply, and liquidity is relatively low, so expect slippage when trading.
Evidence needs refreshing: Saved evidence is out of date and has not been re-verified.
1. Holder concentration
Top 10 measured individual wallets hold 16.13% of supply. This describes sampled wallet concentration, not independently verified owners.
Why it matters: Concentrated holdings increase potential sell pressure; separate wallet addresses do not establish separate beneficial owners.
2. Liquidity and exits
Liquidity: market provider reports 24,445. Exit depth may be limited; LP protection must be checked separately.
Why it matters: Limited available liquidity can make large trades expensive or difficult to exit; a market quote is not proof of LP protection.
Evidence quality & missing verification
Data available: 7/7 categories with data. Data availability does not mean every required check was verified.
Confidence describes evidence quality, coverage and freshness.
- Required verification checks are incomplete; category availability does not establish completed verification.
- The report evidence is stale or its observation time is invalid; confidence is limited.
- The observed pool is under 24 hours old; the existing confidence policy limits this report to Low. Pool age is not itself a risk finding.
- the underlying evidence is stale and has not been re-verified
Informational context
- The observed pool is only 19h old — early analysis.
Pool age, market activity and identity details do not independently establish safety or risk.
Ruggy commentary
“I'd keep an eye on this one. Not scary, but not spotless.”
Follow Rug.Tools & discuss this report
Discuss in Discord ↗Market snapshot & additional signals
Market snapshot & key evidence
Total tracked liquidity
$24,444.55
Combined across tracked pools. Individual pools can have much less liquidity; the total is not an executable exit quote.
Market snapshot · · Snapshot values are not live quotes. Earlier or mixed market observations are being retained.
Compare tracked pools (2)
- pumpswap · Primary2hmQJQP…2kN8R ↗$24,444.55
- pumpfun81XAt9y…1W1ZU ↗Not recorded
Important signals
Recorded facts · open cards for evidenceNo measured historical exposure for a non-empty cohort. 0 tracked launch wallets; historical exposure does not establish current control or common ownership.
Evidence details
First sampled launch activity: unavailable; reconstruction captured: 2026-10-27 11:51:08.726Z.
0/0 tracked wallets measured (unknown).
Evidence details
Current holdings are unverified because the observation is stale or unavailable. Balance observation: 2026-10-27 11:51:09.013Z. Zero tracked balances do not establish complete exits or rule out transfers to other wallets. Transfers alone do not prove sales.
Native launch-window sample
Largest account below 10% · Top 10: 16.1% (Medium Concentration)
Identified creator wallet only; connected wallets are assessed separately.
Verified mint-control evidence; this does not establish overall token safety.
Verified pool / position: 2hmQJQPkJP67f68rd1AkPyWjVYVfpPi9aDExTXw2kN8R.
Evidence details
Applies to the measured pool / position only; other liquidity positions require separate evidence. This does not establish overall safety.
Market values are preserved from an earlier observation and are not verified as current. Current wallet holdings and historical launch exposure measure different moments. Open the full analysis for funding links, LP protection and source evidence.
Creator / developer
Identified creator holds 0.00%
Detailed reportCheck Full DetailsWallet links, holder distribution, liquidity protection, creator activity, contract controls and source evidence.Check Full Details ↓Hide Full Details ↑
Sources & extended intelligence
Provider evidence, research and report overview
GMGN intelligence
Independent token signals. The Rug.Tools verdict stays based on its own analysis.
Native launch analysis reconstructs a sampled launch-window wallet cohort as a percentage of token supply. GMGN bundler activity estimates a share of trading volume using its own wallet tags; its observation window and population are not established as equivalent. No native pattern in a sample does not rule out GMGN activity. Neither signal alone proves shared funding, bundle execution or insider ownership.
GMGN has not returned data for this token. Your scan and verdict remain available.
Live Wallet Intelligence
Loading wallet evidence separately from your scan…
Recent Solana / Pump.fun launches · Supporting evidence
Wallet Trade Context
Loading trade context separately from your scan…
Challenge this report with historical patterns
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Ownership
Top 10: 16.1%
Launch Wallets
0 tracked wallets · relationship unverified. Zero tracked balances do not prove complete exits or rule out transfers to other wallets.
GMGN supplemental unavailable
Liquidity
2 pool vaults identified on-chain
100.0% of measured LP burned
Creator
Identified wallet only; total team or connected-wallet ownership is not established
Total tracked liquidity
$24,444.55
Combined across tracked pools. Individual pools can have much less liquidity; the total is not an executable exit quote.
Market snapshot · · Snapshot values are not live quotes. Earlier or mixed market observations are being retained.
Compare tracked pools (2)
- pumpswap · Primary2hmQJQP…2kN8R ↗$24,444.55
- pumpfun81XAt9y…1W1ZU ↗Not recorded
▥ Quick Facts
Key metrics for a quick assessment.▣ Why Rug.Tools says this
Top native findingsScan finished · limited evidence
5/6 evidence groups resolved. Publication does not mean every check is verified.
Market values are preserved from an earlier observation and are not verified as current.

“I'd keep an eye on this one. Not scary, but not spotless.”
- Symbol
- GAMBIT
- Contract
- GrtE7xGn3iBk93hhf1zz6i3Wbfv1uDd9unStGVhGpump
- Chain
- Solana
- Launchpad
- Pump.fun
- Holders
- 357
- Top Wallet
- 4.2%
- Top 10
- 16.1%
- Creator
- 0.00%
- Pool-held token supply
- 41.68%
Explore holder analysis, wallet relationships, liquidity evidence, contract history and more.
Advanced wallet & evidence view▾
Left: created or funded this token. Right: holds part of its supply today.
Follow the arrows: who created the token, and where the supply sits today.
- ◉ Holder distribution resolved
Largest measured holder account: 4.2%.
- ♙ Creator identified
- ◫ Liquidity pool verified on-chain
- ⌗ Bundle analysis resolved
Currently sits at $24.4K in liquidity, $127.2K traded in the last 24h, 357 holders. The largest sampled holder account holds 4.2%; independent control is unverified. The creator wallet is identified, the observed pool is 19 hours old.
Report overview & findings
Full narrative and supporting findings
Key Findings
🔍 Detail FindingsMedium Concentration: top-ten sampled accounts hold 16.13% of supply.
Percentages use total token supply and the sampled holder population, excluding classified pools, burns and protocol accounts. Separate addresses may share a controller. Price impact depends on liquidity and trade size.
Largest sampled account holds 4.18% of supply.
Largest account below 10%. This describes one account, not the overall holder distribution. Percentages use total token supply and the sampled holder population, excluding classified pools, burns and protocol accounts. Separate addresses may share a controller. Price impact depends on liquidity and trade size.
Observed trading pool is under 24 hours old — evidence is preliminary.
This is the observed trading-pool timestamp, not verified mint age. Limited observation history can restrict confidence; pool age alone does not establish safety or risk.
Overview
GAMBIT
$GAMBITThis observed trading pool is less than 24 hours old (19 hours old). Pool creation does not establish the token’s mint age. Some blockchain signals are not yet available and the analysis may change as more activity occurs.
Holders & connected wallets
Top 10 individuals: 16.1%Population & measurement scope
Percentages use total token supply. Classified liquidity pools, burn addresses and protocol accounts are excluded from this holder population. Separate addresses may share a controller.
Advanced details▾
Liquidity protection
100.0% of measured LP burned100.0% of measured LP is burned.
Ownership, protection & source evidence
100.0% of LP tokens are verified burned. This applies only to the measured pool or position and protects it against holder withdrawal; it does not prevent price losses or every liquidity risk.
Protection applies only to the measured pool or position; it does not establish overall token safety.
Source: Pump.fun migration proof (on-chain)
Creator intelligence
Creator identifiedDyw9AfVTH3Wp8w1eiVgRjXbVTXwuuZ9ogj8zeeorTZ5b(Dyw9…TZ5b)Historical creator balance: 0.00% of the supply at that time
At the previous recorded mint update · 2026-10-27 11:27:50 UTC · slot 462053446
A historical balance alone does not establish a sale, current ownership or a scam.
Developer network could not be fully verified
Wallet-link evidence is incomplete. Missing evidence is not treated as safe.
Incomplete wallet evidence does not lower the overall risk verdict.
Inspect wallet links & supporting evidence▾
- • Verified creator wallet currently holds 0.00%
Dyw9Af…orTZ5b · verified attributionCoverage note: connected-wallet relationships are still loading; combined bundle balances have not been fully verified.
Wallet relationships are one risk category. The overall Rug.Tools verdict can still be High Risk because of contract controls, trading restrictions, liquidity, holder concentration, or other evidence. A dominant holder is a concentration risk; one large wallet alone is not proof that several wallets are connected.
Presentation-only · does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict
Launch activity
Historical exposure and current holdingsLaunch & wallet evidence
Native evidence explorer
Launch, wallet flows & liquidity custody
Inspect what was observed, which balances were measured, and what remains unverified. Timing and transfers alone do not establish common ownership or a sale.
Investigate creator trades & token transfers
Forensic intelligence / Activity
What did the developer actually do?
Separate current holdings, historical launch exposure, verified sales and token transfers. Follow the receipts before drawing conclusions.
- Creator holdings
- 0.00%
- Historical launch exposure
- Unknown
Saved balance measurement; separate from sale history
Observed launch-group share of total token supply; not every graph node, developer sales or present insider ownership
Developer sales: Insufficient Evidence · Trading integrity: Not Scored. A creator holding 0% does not establish whether tokens were sold or transferred.
Launch evidence
3 observed recipients
5 receipts examined
Current cohort balances
Unknown
Recipient cohort not recorded
Custody coverage
2 custody accounts / markets
1 without verified protection
Token custody and LP withdrawal protection are separate checks.
Creator provenance
Dyw9Af…TZ5b · 0.00% current measured holdings
Attribution: mint_transaction. Identified wallet only; this does not establish total team ownership.
Launch timeline & receipt references
Anchor slot #462,000,678 · observed through #462,000,703 · Reconstruction captured:
| From anchor | Recipients | Net inflow / supply | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| +0 slots | 2 | 48.89% | Verified interval |
| +2 slots | 2 | 48.89% | Verified interval |
| +5 slots | 3 | 48.89% | Verified interval |
| +10 slots | 3 | 48.89% | Verified interval |
Intervals include the anchor through the stated offset. Net inflows are token movements recorded in those receipts, divided by supply measured at replay time; they are not confirmed purchases or current holdings. Partial replay may omit inflows or outflows. Historical values are not clamped into ownership claims.
- 234v8j…PFSf · #462,000,678
- 27KbQh…P3am · #462,000,678
- 4nuc4V…qj5h · #462,000,682
- PGvmbN…UKJz · #462,000,683
- 4Gcasi…PzoX · #462,000,690
Pool-by-pool custody & protection
41.68% of token supply in custody · reported role / market · vault 6pozQ2…5kAB
Token custody does not verify LP position ownership, locks or withdrawal protection.
14.64% of token supply in custody · native custody evidence · vault B96MAm…fGGA
LP-token burn protection applies to this measured pool only. Other pools and positions are assessed separately.
Measured wallet balances & transfer evidence
A measured zero balance does not prove a sale. Unknown balances are not zero. Only 0 stored sample rows are listed; aggregate coverage includes missing rows.
| Recipient | Current balance | First position | Receipt references |
|---|
Source snapshot: . This evidence explorer does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict. Existing risk findings, verification gates and source timestamps remain authoritative.
RugGraph / Wallet intelligenceLinked-wallet graph13 wallets · 0 transaction references. Follow the receipts from saved launch evidence.Open wallet graph ↓
01 / Launch activity
Select a wallet to see its activity near token launch. Early receipt of tokens alone does not prove a sniper purchase.
Cyan: tokens received · Amber: tokens moved out · Dashed: deployment. Lines connect wallets to the launch sample; they do not identify who sent the tokens. The first 12 wallets are plotted; every listed wallet can be inspected below.
Dyw9AfVTH3Wp8w1eiVgRjXbVTXwuuZ9ogj8zeeorTZ5b
Creator attribution
Balance at last observation
0.00%
2026-10-27 11:51:09 UTC · observation, not a live balance
No transaction reference was stored for this wallet. No relationship is inferred.
Creator balance history
2026-10-27 11:27:50 UTC · previous mint write
Exact on-chain amounts
0 / 959702895074964 raw units
Checkpoints show historical balances. A reduction does not establish a sale. Launching multiple tokens does not establish malicious intent.
02 / Funding connections
Where did the funding come from?
Follow verified transfers back up to three wallets. Select any connected wallet to explore its evidence.
Evidence first. Ownership stays unproven.
A transfer proves funds moved between addresses. It does not prove they belong to the same person. Known exchange, bridge and pool accounts are marked as infrastructure.
How to read this evidence
Arrows show receipt references associated with the launch sample. They do not identify transfer counterparties or establish common ownership.
An early recipient is not necessarily a buyer or sniper. Outflows may be transfers; these summaries do not establish realized sales.
Balance measurements retain their original timestamps. Historical launch exposure is separate from present holdings.
Funding paths, verified swap activity and volume manipulation require additional transaction evidence. Missing history is unknown.
Source snapshot: 2026-10-27 11:51:09 UTC · Funding research runs only when requested.
No pattern detected in the available sample; this does not rule out coordination. Launch timing is an observation; coordination is a suspicion. Verified funding links require transaction evidence. Confirmed bundle execution requires bundle-specific proof. None alone establishes common ownership or insider control.
Historical launch exposure: No measured historical exposure for a non-empty cohort. 0 tracked launch wallets; historical exposure does not establish current control or common ownership. First sampled launch activity: unavailable; reconstruction captured: 2026-10-27 11:51:08.726Z.
Current launch-wallet holdings: 0/0 tracked wallets measured (unknown). Current holdings are unverified because the observation is stale or unavailable. Balance observation: 2026-10-27 11:51:09.013Z. Zero tracked balances do not establish complete exits or rule out transfers to other wallets. Transfers alone do not prove sales.
Wallets are only listed when they share funding, were funded by the creator, bought near-identical amounts, or bought in the same block. Buying early alone is not enough to be flagged. Confidence rises as more on-chain data becomes available. Cached for 24 hours.
Contract & risk evidence
No flagged controls detectedAnalysis
This token currently shows very few visible on-chain risk indicators. No single wallet controls a large share of the visible supply.
The largest individual wallet holds 4.18% of the supply, while the top 10 wallets combined control 16.13%. This means that no single holder has enough influence to significantly impact the token price.
There are two liquidity pools identified, and the largest liquidity pool accounts for 41.68%. These liquidity pool wallets are excluded from the concentration calculations.
All on-chain metadata is complete, with no missing fields noted.
This report reflects only publicly available blockchain information and should not be considered financial advice.
Recorded score inputs & context▾
Legacy score inputs are retained for audit. The canonical verdict, required evidence gates and confidence are assessed separately. Age and metadata alone do not establish risk.
- Medium Concentration: top-ten sampled accounts hold 16.13% of supply.0 recorded score points
- Liquidity pool detected correctly0 recorded score points
- Largest sampled account holds 4.18% of supply.0 recorded score points
Name, symbol, image and description are all present on-chain.
Percentages use total token supply and the sampled holder population, excluding classified pools, burns and protocol accounts. Separate addresses may share a controller. Price impact depends on liquidity and trade size.
Analysis coverage
7/7 checks with usable evidence- Token identity · evidence verified · required
- Market data · evidence verified
- Liquidity depth · evidence verified
- Holder distribution · evidence verified · required
- Creator attribution · evidence verified
- Liquidity protection · evidence verified
- Launch reconstruction · evidence verified
2/2 required checks have usable evidence. A completed scan is not proof of safety. Missing evidence stays unknown; confirmed risk findings still apply.
Confidence measures the support, quality and freshness of the report evidence, not token safety or proof of wallet relationships.
- • Required checks are incomplete; available categories do not establish completed verification
Chart & market details
Price, volume, liquidity and venue
Market
More market data▾
Price chart
Load verified candle history to explore price and volume directly in this report.
Market activity
Recent trades and participating wallets · Birdeye
Loaded only when requested. No background refresh.
Contract metadata & token accounts
Supply, decimals, descriptions and holder records
Blockchain
Description▾
Okay, so I just built a trading bot by combining GrokBot and Unibot into one terminal. And somehow this thing already made me $12K in just 48 hours lol. Basically, Grok handles the intelligence while Unibot executes the trades. Here's what I added: → GROK SCOUT finds coins trending on X → SNIPER buys tokens right at launch → CURVE trades the bonding curve → GRADUATE sells once a token graduates But here's the interesting part. It actually knows when NOT to buy. Dev holds more than 10%? Skipped. Over 25% bundled? Skipped. Wallet connected to an old rug? Skipped. It also sends me updates on every trade and asks if I want to keep going once my profit target is reached. I can literally talk to it like I'm talking to a friend and tell it what to buy, sell, or avoid. People are still paying for Telegram alpha calls while I'm building something that finds opportunities, filters out potential rugs, and executes trades without waiting for someone to drop a contract address. That's literally the problem I wanted to solve. Still testing a few things, but $12K in 48 hours is pretty crazy. Obviously, that doesn't guarantee it'll keep performing like this. I think I accidentally built something interesting here.
Largest token accounts▾
EMuf…jtrq2hmQ…kN8REMFH…1kUo2heJ…DogFGyfR…2yfs| # | Type | Wallet | % | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 💧Meteora LP | Meteora DLMM Pool EMuf…jtrqTrading liquidity, not an individual holder | 41.68% | |
| 2 | 💧Pool vault | PumpSwap Pool Vault⭐ 2hmQ…kN8RVerified pool custody; liquidity lock protection is assessed separately. | 14.64% | |
| 3 | ?Unclassified | Unclassified Account EMFH…1kUoRug.Tools could not confidently identify this account | 4.18% | |
| 4 | ?Unclassified | Unclassified Account 2heJ…DogFRug.Tools could not confidently identify this account | 2.71% | |
| 5 | ?Unclassified | Unclassified Account GyfR…2yfsRug.Tools could not confidently identify this account | 2.62% |
Related reports & provenance
Related tokens and report synchronization
Related tokens to investigate
Tokens with similar creator, launchpad, wallet activity, or risk signals.
