
The Nietzschean Explorer
$KarlFn56KLAXwvp7U4k22UtfMtgRzQ7vBgkBihTvNd5d9YPvShareHigh Risk
The identified creator holds 99.886% of supply; A single holder account holds 99.9% of supply; independent control is not established.

Evidence-backed reasons, ranked by recorded severity. Open Evidence & Caveats below for complete explanations and limits.
- Observation
1. Recorded finding
Largest measured individual wallet holds 99.9% of supply; the controller of other wallets is undetermined.
Why it matters: Concentrated holdings increase potential sell pressure; separate wallet addresses do not establish separate beneficial owners.
- Observation
2. Holder concentration
100.00%of supply
Held by the top 10 sampled wallets. Separate addresses may share an owner.
Why it matters: Concentrated holdings increase potential sell pressure; separate wallet addresses do not establish separate beneficial owners.
- Observation
3. Creator history
Creator wallet held 99.89% of verified supply at the recorded scan.
Why it matters: Creator holdings or capabilities are worth monitoring, but do not by themselves establish intent or future trades.
Evidence & Caveats 3 recorded reasons · 5 verification gapsClick to expandExpanded
Recorded verdict explanation
The identified creator holds 99.886% of supply; A single holder account holds 99.9% of supply; independent control is not established.
Some checks unverified: Check unverified · Launch-wallet balances unverified.
1. Recorded finding
Largest measured individual wallet holds 99.9% of supply; the controller of other wallets is undetermined.
Why it matters: Concentrated holdings increase potential sell pressure; separate wallet addresses do not establish separate beneficial owners.
2. Holder concentration
Top 10 measured individual wallets hold 100.00% of supply. This describes sampled wallet concentration, not independently verified owners.
Why it matters: Concentrated holdings increase potential sell pressure; separate wallet addresses do not establish separate beneficial owners.
3. Creator history
Creator wallet held 99.89% of verified supply at the recorded scan. This does not establish future sales or intent.
Why it matters: Creator holdings or capabilities are worth monitoring, but do not by themselves establish intent or future trades.
Evidence quality & missing verification
Data available: 4/7 categories with data. Data availability does not mean every required check was verified.
Confidence describes evidence quality, coverage and freshness.
- Required verification checks are incomplete; category availability does not establish completed verification.
- The report evidence is stale or its observation time is invalid; confidence is limited.
- the stored market assessment includes claims not established by its recorded evidence
- current launch-wallet ownership is incomplete or stale
- Liquidity protection is not verified; missing evidence does not prove that funds are unlocked.
Ruggy commentary
“I'm not touching this. The contract or wallets are set up badly.”
Follow Rug.Tools & discuss this report
Discuss in Discord ↗Market snapshot & additional signals
Market snapshot & key evidence
Primary pool · venue unknown
Not recorded
Total tracked liquidity
Not recorded
Combined across tracked pools. Individual pools can have much less liquidity; the total is not an executable exit quote.
Market snapshot · Observation time unavailable · Snapshot values are not live quotes.
Per-pool amounts were not recorded in this snapshot. The total must not be read as the primary pool's liquidity.
Important signals
Recorded facts · open cards for evidenceNo measured historical exposure for a non-empty cohort. 0 tracked launch wallets; historical exposure does not establish current control or common ownership.
Evidence details
First sampled launch activity: unavailable; reconstruction captured: unavailable.
0/0 tracked wallets measured (unknown).
Evidence details
Current holdings are unverified because the observation is stale or unavailable. Balance observation: unavailable. Zero tracked balances do not establish complete exits or rule out transfers to other wallets. Transfers alone do not prove sales.
Native launch-window sample
Very Highly Concentrated · Top 10: 100.0% (High Concentration)
Identified creator wallet only; connected wallets are assessed separately.
Verified mint-control evidence; this does not establish overall token safety.
No protective claim without on-chain proof
Current wallet holdings and historical launch exposure measure different moments. Open the full analysis for funding links, LP protection and source evidence.
Creator / developer
Identified creator holds 99.89%
Detailed reportFull analysis & source evidenceWallet links, holder distribution, liquidity protection, creator activity, contract controls and source evidence.Expand full analysis ↓Collapse full analysis ↑
Sources & extended intelligence
Provider evidence, research and report overview
GMGN intelligence
Independent token signals. The Rug.Tools verdict stays based on its own analysis.
Native launch analysis reconstructs a sampled launch-window wallet cohort as a percentage of token supply. GMGN bundler activity estimates a share of trading volume using its own wallet tags; its observation window and population are not established as equivalent. No native pattern in a sample does not rule out GMGN activity. Neither signal alone proves shared funding, bundle execution or insider ownership.
GMGN has not returned data for this token. Your scan and verdict remain available.
Live Wallet Intelligence
Loading wallet evidence separately from your scan…
Recent Solana / Pump.fun launches · Supporting evidence
Wallet Trade Context
Loading trade context separately from your scan…
Challenge this report with historical patterns
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Ownership
Top 10: 100.0%
Launch Wallets
0 tracked wallets · relationship unverified. Zero tracked balances do not prove complete exits or rule out transfers to other wallets.
GMGN supplemental unavailable
Liquidity
No verified liquidity amount available
Not verified
Creator
Identified wallet only; total team or connected-wallet ownership is not established
Primary pool · venue unknown
Not recorded
Total tracked liquidity
Not recorded
Combined across tracked pools. Individual pools can have much less liquidity; the total is not an executable exit quote.
Market snapshot · Observation time unavailable · Snapshot values are not live quotes.
Per-pool amounts were not recorded in this snapshot. The total must not be read as the primary pool's liquidity.
▥ Quick Facts
Key metrics for a quick assessment.▣ Why Rug.Tools says this
Top native findingsScan finished · limited evidence
4/6 evidence groups resolved. Publication does not mean every check is verified.

“I'm not touching this. The contract or wallets are set up badly.”
- Symbol
- Karl
- Contract
- Fn56KLAXwvp7U4k22UtfMtgRzQ7vBgkBihTvNd5d9YPv
- Chain
- Solana
- Launchpad
- Unknown
- Holders
- 2
- Top Wallet
- 99.9%
- Top 10
- 100.0%
- Creator
- 99.89%
- Pool-held token supply
- N/A
Explore holder analysis, wallet relationships, liquidity evidence, contract history and more.
Advanced wallet & evidence view▾
Left: created or funded this token. Right: holds part of its supply today.
Follow the arrows: who created the token, and where the supply sits today.
- ◉ Holder distribution resolved
Largest measured holder account: 99.9%.
- ♙ Creator identified
- ◫ LP verification limited
- ⌗ Bundle analysis resolved
Currently sits at 2 holders. The largest wallet controls 99.9% of supply. The creator wallet is identified, the observed pool is approximately 23 days old.
Report overview & findings
Full narrative and supporting findings
Key Findings
🔍 Detail FindingsLargest sampled account holds 99.89% of supply.
Very Highly Concentrated. This describes one account, not the overall holder distribution. Percentages use total token supply and the sampled holder population, excluding classified pools, burns and protocol accounts. Separate addresses may share a controller. Price impact depends on liquidity and trade size.
High Concentration: top-ten sampled accounts hold 100.00% of supply.
Percentages use total token supply and the sampled holder population, excluding classified pools, burns and protocol accounts. Separate addresses may share a controller. Price impact depends on liquidity and trade size.
Very few holders — an early or thinly-traded project.
There aren't many wallets holding this token yet. Illiquid markets like this are easy to manipulate and hard to exit cleanly.
Token metadata looks incomplete.
Name, symbol, image, or on-chain description are missing or malformed. Legitimate projects usually complete this at launch — missing metadata is a small but real quality signal.
Overview

The Nietzschean Explorer
$KarlHolders & connected wallets
Top 10 individuals: 100.0%Population & measurement scope
Percentages use total token supply. Classified liquidity pools, burn addresses and protocol accounts are excluded from this holder population. Separate addresses may share a controller.
Advanced details▾
Liquidity protection
Not verifiedLP lock or burn protection has not been verified. Missing evidence does not mean liquidity is unlocked.
Ownership, protection & source evidence
No liquidity-pool wallet could be matched on-chain, so LP lock status is Unknown. Missing data is never treated as evidence of risk.
Protection applies only to the measured pool or position; it does not establish overall token safety.
Creator intelligence
Creator identifiedCNxjmHYSa2hezwn9j3xNW7jMZjYN2mPNNdYrS6GfUpv(CNxj…fUpv)Developer network could not be fully verified
Wallet-link evidence is incomplete. Missing evidence is not treated as safe.
Incomplete wallet evidence does not lower the overall risk verdict.
Inspect wallet links & supporting evidence▾
- • Verified creator wallet currently holds 99.89%
CNxjmH…6GfUpv · verified attributionCoverage note: connected-wallet relationships are still loading; combined bundle balances have not been fully verified.
Wallet relationships are one risk category. The overall Rug.Tools verdict can still be High Risk because of contract controls, trading restrictions, liquidity, holder concentration, or other evidence. A dominant holder is a concentration risk; one large wallet alone is not proof that several wallets are connected.
Presentation-only · does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict
Launch activity
Historical exposure and current holdingsLaunch & wallet evidence
Native evidence explorer
Launch, wallet flows & liquidity custody
Inspect what was observed, which balances were measured, and what remains unverified. Timing and transfers alone do not establish common ownership or a sale.
Investigate creator trades & token transfers
Forensic intelligence / Activity
What did the developer actually do?
Separate current holdings, historical launch exposure, verified sales and token transfers. Follow the receipts before drawing conclusions.
- Creator holdings
- 99.89%
- Historical launch exposure
- Unknown
Saved balance measurement; separate from sale history
Observed launch-group share of total token supply; not every graph node, developer sales or present insider ownership
Developer sales: Insufficient Evidence · Trading integrity: Not Scored. A creator holding 0% does not establish whether tokens were sold or transferred.
Launch evidence
0 stored cohort rows
Interval evidence only; full launch coverage is reported separately.
Receipt-level replay was not stored for this snapshot.
Current cohort balances
Unknown
Recipient cohort not recorded
Observation time unavailable
Custody coverage
0 custody accounts / markets
0 without verified protection
Token custody and LP withdrawal protection are separate checks.
Creator provenance
CNxjmH…fUpv · 99.89% current measured holdings
Attribution: mint_transaction. Identified wallet only; this does not establish total team ownership.
Launch timeline & receipt references
This older snapshot contains a recipient cohort, not the full receipt timeline. Counts and timing describe only the stored sample. Exact interval supply figures and transaction references remain unknown until a bounded native replay records them.
Pool-by-pool custody & protection
No position-level custody evidence is stored. This does not establish that liquidity is absent or protected.
Measured wallet balances & transfer evidence
A measured zero balance does not prove a sale. Unknown balances are not zero. Only 0 stored sample rows are listed; aggregate coverage includes missing rows.
| Recipient | Current balance | First position | Receipt references |
|---|
Source snapshot: . This evidence explorer does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict. Existing risk findings, verification gates and source timestamps remain authoritative.
RugGraph / Wallet intelligenceLinked-wallet graph2 wallets · 0 transaction references. Follow the receipts from saved launch evidence.Open wallet graph ↓
01 / Launch activity
Select a wallet to see its activity near token launch. Early receipt of tokens alone does not prove a sniper purchase.
Cyan: tokens received · Amber: tokens moved out · Dashed: deployment. Lines connect wallets to the launch sample; they do not identify who sent the tokens.
CNxjmHYSa2hezwn9j3xNW7jMZjYN2mPNNdYrS6GfUpv
Creator attribution · Major holder
Balance at last observation
99.89%
2026-10-22 02:31:01 UTC · observation, not a live balance
No transaction reference was stored for this wallet. No relationship is inferred.
02 / Funding connections
Where did the funding come from?
Follow verified transfers back up to three wallets. Select any connected wallet to explore its evidence.
Evidence first. Ownership stays unproven.
A transfer proves funds moved between addresses. It does not prove they belong to the same person. Known exchange, bridge and pool accounts are marked as infrastructure.
How to read this evidence
Arrows show receipt references associated with the launch sample. They do not identify transfer counterparties or establish common ownership.
An early recipient is not necessarily a buyer or sniper. Outflows may be transfers; these summaries do not establish realized sales.
Balance measurements retain their original timestamps. Historical launch exposure is separate from present holdings.
Funding paths, verified swap activity and volume manipulation require additional transaction evidence. Missing history is unknown.
Source snapshot: 2026-10-22 02:40:48 UTC · Funding research runs only when requested.
No pattern detected in the available sample; this does not rule out coordination. Launch timing is an observation; coordination is a suspicion. Verified funding links require transaction evidence. Confirmed bundle execution requires bundle-specific proof. None alone establishes common ownership or insider control.
Historical launch exposure: No measured historical exposure for a non-empty cohort. 0 tracked launch wallets; historical exposure does not establish current control or common ownership. First sampled launch activity: unavailable; reconstruction captured: unavailable.
Launch-wallet holdings at observation: 0/0 tracked wallets measured (unknown). Current holdings are unverified because the observation is stale or unavailable. Balance observation: unavailable. Zero tracked balances do not establish complete exits or rule out transfers to other wallets. Transfers alone do not prove sales.
Wallets are only listed when they share funding, were funded by the creator, bought near-identical amounts, or bought in the same block. Buying early alone is not enough to be flagged. Confidence rises as more on-chain data becomes available. Cached for 24 hours.
Contract & risk evidence
No flagged controls detectedAnalysis
High Risk — The identified creator holds 99.886% of supply; A single holder account holds 99.9% of supply; independent control is not established.
Recorded score inputs & context▾
Legacy score inputs are retained for audit. The canonical verdict, required evidence gates and confidence are assessed separately. Age and metadata alone do not establish risk.
- Incomplete on-chain metadataContext only
- Largest wallet holds 99.9%40 recorded score points
- Top 10 wallets hold 100.0%35 recorded score points
- Only 2 non-LP token accounts visible in analyzed coverageContext only
No on-chain project description was found.
The largest non-liquidity wallet controls 99.89% of the total supply.
Only 2 non-liquidity token accounts are visible in the analyzed largest-account coverage.
Analysis coverage
4/7 checks with usable evidence- Token identity · evidence verified · required
- Market data · limited / unavailable
- Liquidity depth · limited / unavailable
- Holder distribution · evidence verified · required
- Creator attribution · evidence verified
- Liquidity protection · limited / unavailable
- Launch reconstruction · evidence verified
2/2 required checks have usable evidence. A completed scan is not proof of safety. Missing evidence stays unknown; confirmed risk findings still apply.
Confidence measures the support, quality and freshness of the report evidence, not token safety or proof of wallet relationships.
- • Required checks are incomplete; available categories do not establish completed verification
Chart & market details
Price, volume, liquidity and venue
Market
More market data▾
Price chart
Load verified candle history to explore price and volume directly in this report.
Market activity
Recent trades and participating wallets · Birdeye
Loaded only when requested. No background refresh.
Contract metadata & token accounts
Supply, decimals, descriptions and holder records
Blockchain
Largest token accounts▾
CNxj…fUpvHLnp…TLcCRelated reports & provenance
Related tokens and report synchronization
Related tokens to investigate
Tokens with similar creator, launchpad, wallet activity, or risk signals.
