Ownership
Top 10: 24.1%
F1BQXs8RTr3pugsCddw3dGVWhfTAPhyLJpuWYpzgRZtUShareThe main concerns are launch-wallet activity and holder concentration.
Saved scan — verdict as of 2026-10-28 22:45:40 UTC
Current market conditions are unverified. Run Analyze Again for a new assessment.
LP protection unverified · Evidence needs refreshing.
Verification gaps: 6 recorded items. Full explanations in Evidence & Caveats below.

Evidence-backed reasons, ranked by recorded severity. Open Evidence & Caveats below for complete explanations and limits.
Up to 48.42%of supply
29 sampled launch wallets; this is historical exposure, not current holdings.
Why it matters: Historical launch exposure can create concentration risk. It does not establish current balances, common wallet control, or executed bundles.
Wallet relationships unverified
24.13%of supply
Held by the top 10 sampled wallets. Separate addresses may share an owner.
Why it matters: Concentrated holdings increase potential sell pressure; separate wallet addresses do not establish separate beneficial owners.
The token is actively trading, but sampled holder accounts hold 24.1% of supply, and liquidity is relatively low, so expect slippage when trading, and a launch-pattern cluster acquired 48.4% of supply, but independent wallet linkage is not fully corroborated.
The main concerns are launch-wallet activity and holder concentration.
The token is actively trading, but sampled holder accounts hold 24.1% of supply, and liquidity is relatively low, so expect slippage when trading, and a launch-pattern cluster acquired 48.4% of supply, but independent wallet linkage is not fully corroborated.
Some checks unverified: LP protection unverified · Evidence needs refreshing.
Historical launch exposure: up to 48.42% of supply was attributed to a sampled launch-pattern group of 29 wallets. Coordination, common ownership and bundle execution are not established.
Why it matters: Historical launch exposure can create concentration risk. It does not establish current balances, common wallet control, or executed bundles.
Top 10 measured individual wallets hold 24.13% of supply. This describes sampled wallet concentration, not independently verified owners.
Why it matters: Concentrated holdings increase potential sell pressure; separate wallet addresses do not establish separate beneficial owners.
Data available: 5/7 categories with data. Data availability does not mean every required check was verified.
Confidence describes evidence quality, coverage and freshness.
“I'm getting nervous. Multiple concerns worth reading before you touch this.”
Market snapshot & key evidence
Not recorded
Not recorded
Combined across tracked pools. Individual pools can have much less liquidity; the total is not an executable exit quote.
Market snapshot · Observation time unavailable · Snapshot values are not live quotes.
Per-pool amounts were not recorded in this snapshot. The total must not be read as the primary pool's liquidity.
29 tracked launch wallets; historical exposure does not establish current control or common ownership.
First sampled launch activity: 2026-09-19 20:59:38 UTC; reconstruction captured: 2026-10-28 22:45:36.801Z.
29/29 tracked wallets measured (known).
Current holdings are unverified because the observation is stale or unavailable. Balance observation: 2026-10-28 22:45:39.856Z. Zero tracked balances do not establish complete exits or rule out transfers to other wallets. Transfers alone do not prove sales.
Suspicious coordination
Largest account below 10% · Top 10: 24.1% (Medium Concentration)
Creator identity or balance could not be verified.
Verified mint-control evidence; this does not establish overall token safety.
No protective claim without on-chain proof
Current wallet holdings and historical launch exposure measure different moments. Open the full analysis for funding links, LP protection and source evidence.
Independent token signals. The Rug.Tools verdict stays based on its own analysis.
Native launch analysis reconstructs a sampled launch-window wallet cohort as a percentage of token supply. GMGN bundler activity estimates a share of trading volume using its own wallet tags; its observation window and population are not established as equivalent. No native pattern in a sample does not rule out GMGN activity. Neither signal alone proves shared funding, bundle execution or insider ownership.
GMGN has not returned data for this token. Your scan and verdict remain available.
Loading wallet evidence separately from your scan…
Recent Solana / Pump.fun launches · Supporting evidence
Loading trade context separately from your scan…
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Top 10: 24.1%
29 tracked wallets · relationship unverified. Zero tracked balances do not prove complete exits or rule out transfers to other wallets.
48.42% historical launch · current tracked holdings unverified · 29/29 wallets measured · balances observed 2026-10-28T22:45:39.856+00:00
GMGN supplemental unavailable
1 pool vault identified on-chain
Not verified
Creator wallet not identified
Not recorded
Not recorded
Combined across tracked pools. Individual pools can have much less liquidity; the total is not an executable exit quote.
Market snapshot · Observation time unavailable · Snapshot values are not live quotes.
Per-pool amounts were not recorded in this snapshot. The total must not be read as the primary pool's liquidity.
3/6 evidence groups resolved. Publication does not mean every check is verified.

“I'm getting nervous. Multiple concerns worth reading before you touch this.”
Explore holder analysis, wallet relationships, liquidity evidence, contract history and more.
Left: created or funded this token. Right: holds part of its supply today.
Follow the arrows: who created the token, and where the supply sits today.
Largest measured holder account: 2.8%.
Currently sits at 400 holders. The largest sampled holder account holds 2.8%; independent control is unverified and a launch-wallet pattern was detected; funding relationships, common ownership and bundle execution remain unverified. The creator wallet could not be verified.
We can see liquidity-pool wallets on-chain, but DexScreener isn't returning market data for this token yet. This is common for very new tokens or tokens on smaller venues. Verify pricing on a second source before you trade.
Percentages use total token supply and the sampled holder population, excluding classified pools, burns and protocol accounts. Separate addresses may share a controller. Price impact depends on liquidity and trade size.
Name, symbol, image, or on-chain description are missing or malformed. Legitimate projects usually complete this at launch — missing metadata is a small but real quality signal.
Largest account below 10%. This describes one account, not the overall holder distribution. Percentages use total token supply and the sampled holder population, excluding classified pools, burns and protocol accounts. Separate addresses may share a controller. Price impact depends on liquidity and trade size.
Percentages use total token supply. Classified liquidity pools, burn addresses and protocol accounts are excluded from this holder population. Separate addresses may share a controller.
LP lock or burn protection has not been verified. Missing evidence does not mean liquidity is unlocked.
A live liquidity pool was identified on-chain, but LP token lock or burn status could not be verified for this pool. Liquidity protection is reported as Unknown rather than estimated, and unverified LP is not counted as a risk signal on its own.
Protection applies only to the measured pool or position; it does not establish overall token safety.
creators or authorities field, so the creator wallet cannot be identified.Launch and wallet-link signals were observed. Shared ownership and creator control are not established by this summary.
No relationship evidence was strong enough to list.
Coverage note: connected-wallet relationships are still loading.
Presentation-only · does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict
Native evidence explorer
Inspect what was observed, which balances were measured, and what remains unverified. Timing and transfers alone do not establish common ownership or a sale.
Forensic intelligence / Activity
Separate current holdings, historical launch exposure, verified sales and token transfers. Follow the receipts before drawing conclusions.
Saved balance measurement; separate from sale history
Observed launch-group share of total token supply; not every graph node, developer sales or present insider ownership
Developer sales: Insufficient Evidence · Trading integrity: Not Scored. A creator holding 0% does not establish whether tokens were sold or transferred.
Launch evidence
29 observed recipients
79 receipts examined
Current cohort balances
0.00%
29/29 wallets measured · 0 unknown
Custody coverage
1 custody accounts / markets
1 without verified protection
Token custody and LP withdrawal protection are separate checks.
Anchor slot #448,522,534 · observed through #448,522,559 · Reconstruction captured:
| From anchor | Recipients | Net inflow / supply | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| +0 slots | 8 | 31.51% | Verified interval |
| +2 slots | 9 | 31.31% | Verified interval |
| +5 slots | 10 | 30.62% | Verified interval |
| +10 slots | 22 | 40.44% | Verified interval |
Intervals include the anchor through the stated offset. Net inflows are token movements recorded in those receipts, divided by supply measured at replay time; they are not confirmed purchases or current holdings. Partial replay may omit inflows or outflows. Historical values are not clamped into ownership claims.
23.03% of token supply in custody · reported role / market · vault FWt4qm…JSEV
Token custody does not verify LP position ownership, locks or withdrawal protection.
A measured zero balance does not prove a sale. Unknown balances are not zero. Only 29 stored sample rows are listed; aggregate coverage includes missing rows.
Source snapshot: . This evidence explorer does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict. Existing risk findings, verification gates and source timestamps remain authoritative.
01 / Launch activity
Select a wallet to see its activity near token launch. Early receipt of tokens alone does not prove a sniper purchase.
Cyan: tokens received · Amber: tokens moved out · Dashed: deployment. Lines connect wallets to the launch sample; they do not identify who sent the tokens. The first 12 wallets are plotted; every listed wallet can be inspected below.
4n6XhGZV4itbUwg6yU7xWTqmtH3mzAuQBBD7KK8LFn5s
Early recipient
Balance at last observation
0.00%
2026-10-28 22:45:39 UTC · observation, not a live balance
02 / Funding connections
Follow verified transfers back up to three wallets. Select any connected wallet to explore its evidence.
Evidence first. Ownership stays unproven.
A transfer proves funds moved between addresses. It does not prove they belong to the same person. Known exchange, bridge and pool accounts are marked as infrastructure.
Arrows show receipt references associated with the launch sample. They do not identify transfer counterparties or establish common ownership.
An early recipient is not necessarily a buyer or sniper. Outflows may be transfers; these summaries do not establish realized sales.
Balance measurements retain their original timestamps. Historical launch exposure is separate from present holdings.
Funding paths, verified swap activity and volume manipulation require additional transaction evidence. Missing history is unknown.
Source snapshot: 2026-10-28 22:45:40 UTC · Funding research runs only when requested.
Possible launch-pattern reconstruction; funding relationships and bundle execution are not verified by this signal. Launch timing is an observation; coordination is a suspicion. Verified funding links require transaction evidence. Confirmed bundle execution requires bundle-specific proof. None alone establishes common ownership or insider control.
Historical launch exposure: 29 tracked launch wallets; historical exposure does not establish current control or common ownership. First sampled launch activity: 2026-09-19 20:59:38 UTC; reconstruction captured: 2026-10-28 22:45:36.801Z.
Launch-wallet holdings at observation: 29/29 tracked wallets measured (known). Current holdings are unverified because the observation is stale or unavailable. Balance observation: 2026-10-28 22:45:39.856Z. Zero tracked balances do not establish complete exits or rule out transfers to other wallets. Transfers alone do not prove sales.
Wallets are only listed when they share funding, were funded by the creator, bought near-identical amounts, or bought in the same block. Buying early alone is not enough to be flagged. Confidence rises as more on-chain data becomes available. Cached for 24 hours.
Elevated Risk — The token is actively trading, but sampled holder accounts hold 24.1% of supply, and liquidity is relatively low, so expect slippage when trading, and a launch-pattern cluster acquired 48.4% of supply, but independent wallet linkage is not fully corroborated.
Legacy score inputs are retained for audit. The canonical verdict, required evidence gates and confidence are assessed separately. Age and metadata alone do not establish risk.
No on-chain project description was found.
6 tracked launch wallets acquired 8.09% of supply during the launch window. Funding relationships and bundle execution are not established by this summary. This percentage is historical launch exposure, not current ownership.
Percentages use total token supply and the sampled holder population, excluding classified pools, burns and protocol accounts. Separate addresses may share a controller. Price impact depends on liquidity and trade size.
2/2 required checks have usable evidence. A completed scan is not proof of safety. Missing evidence stays unknown; confirmed risk findings still apply.
Confidence measures the support, quality and freshness of the report evidence, not token safety or proof of wallet relationships.
Load verified candle history to explore price and volume directly in this report.
Recent trades and participating wallets · Birdeye
Loaded only when requested. No background refresh.
8d3f…bB7hFzq4…yk7g8dpp…tELz59xx…Nc7tGJcx…d1iJ| # | Type | Wallet | % | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 💧Pump.fun AMM | Pump.fun AMM Pool 8d3f…bB7hTrading liquidity, not an individual holder | 23.03% | |
| 2 | ?Unclassified | Unclassified Account Fzq4…yk7gRug.Tools could not confidently identify this account | 2.84% | |
| 3 | ?Unclassified | Unclassified Account 8dpp…tELzRug.Tools could not confidently identify this account | 2.66% | |
| 4 | ?Unclassified | Unclassified Account 59xx…Nc7tRug.Tools could not confidently identify this account | 2.66% | |
| 5 | ?Unclassified | Unclassified Account GJcx…d1iJRug.Tools could not confidently identify this account | 2.64% |
Tokens with similar creator, launchpad, wallet activity, or risk signals.