This observed trading pool is less than 24 hours old. Pool creation does not establish the token’s mint age.
Hacker House
$HACKHOUSE9zRNZjZZC94Rgw1ddwzfvqkdJDQpmn9rhmGiqPyVpumpShareChecks Incomplete
This token has not completed a full verified scan yet.
Scanned at 2026-10-30 15:30:48 UTC
Market conditions can change after a scan. Select Analyze Again to refresh.
Verification gaps (2): The observed pool is under 24 hours old; the existing confidence policy limits this report to Low. Pool age is not itself a risk finding. · Liquidity protection is not verified; missing evidence does not prove that funds are unlocked.

Evidence-backed reasons, ranked by recorded severity. Open Evidence & Caveats below for complete explanations and limits.
- Observation
1. Holder concentration
21.82%of supply
Held by the top 10 sampled wallets. Separate addresses may share an owner.
Why it matters: Concentrated holdings increase potential sell pressure; separate wallet addresses do not establish separate beneficial owners.
Evidence & Caveats 1 recorded reason · 2 verification gapsClick to expandExpanded
Recorded verdict explanation
This token has not completed a full verified scan yet.
1. Holder concentration
Top 10 measured individual wallets hold 21.82% of supply. This describes sampled wallet concentration, not independently verified owners.
Why it matters: Concentrated holdings increase potential sell pressure; separate wallet addresses do not establish separate beneficial owners.
Evidence quality & missing verification
Data available: 2/6 stored evidence groups resolved. Data availability does not mean every required check was verified.
Confidence describes evidence quality, coverage and freshness.
- The observed pool is under 24 hours old; the existing confidence policy limits this report to Low. Pool age is not itself a risk finding.
- Liquidity protection is not verified; missing evidence does not prove that funds are unlocked.
Informational context
- The observed pool is only 1h old — early analysis.
Pool age, market activity and identity details do not independently establish safety or risk.
Ruggy commentary
“I can't tell you much from what's on-chain right now.”
Follow Rug.Tools & discuss this report
Discuss in Discord ↗Market snapshot & additional signals
Market snapshot & key evidence
Primary pool · venue unknown
Not recorded
Total tracked liquidity
Not recorded
Combined across tracked pools. Individual pools can have much less liquidity; the total is not an executable exit quote.
Market snapshot · Observation time unavailable · Snapshot values are not live quotes.
Per-pool amounts were not recorded in this snapshot. The total must not be read as the primary pool's liquidity.
Important signals
Recorded facts · open cards for evidenceNo measured historical exposure for a non-empty cohort.
Evidence details
Tracked launch wallets; historical exposure does not establish current control or common ownership. First sampled launch activity: unavailable; reconstruction captured: unavailable.
stored aggregate; wallet coverage unavailable.
Evidence details
Current holdings are unverified because the observation is stale or unavailable. Balance observation: unavailable. Zero tracked balances do not establish complete exits or rule out transfers to other wallets. Transfers alone do not prove sales.
Bundle Scan Pending
Identified creator wallet only; connected wallets are assessed separately.
Verified mint-control evidence; this does not establish overall token safety.
No protective claim without on-chain proof
Current wallet holdings and historical launch exposure measure different moments. Open the full analysis for funding links, LP protection and source evidence.
Creator / developer
Identified creator holds 0.00%
Detailed reportFull analysis & source evidenceWallet links, holder distribution, liquidity protection, creator activity, contract controls and source evidence.Expand full analysis ↓Collapse full analysis ↑
Sources & extended intelligence
Provider evidence, research and report overview
GMGN intelligence
Independent token signals. The Rug.Tools verdict stays based on its own analysis.
Native launch analysis reconstructs a sampled launch-window wallet cohort as a percentage of token supply. GMGN bundler activity estimates a share of trading volume using its own wallet tags; its observation window and population are not established as equivalent. No native pattern in a sample does not rule out GMGN activity. Neither signal alone proves shared funding, bundle execution or insider ownership.
GMGN has not returned data for this token. Your scan and verdict remain available.
Live Wallet Intelligence
Loading wallet evidence separately from your scan…
Recent Solana / Pump.fun launches · Supporting evidence
Wallet Trade Context
Loading trade context separately from your scan…
Challenge this report with historical patterns
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Ownership
Top 10: 21.8%
Launch Wallets
Native bundle evidence is limited
GMGN supplemental unavailable
Liquidity
1 pool vault identified on-chain
Not verified
Creator
Identified wallet only; total team or connected-wallet ownership is not established
Primary pool · venue unknown
Not recorded
Total tracked liquidity
Not recorded
Combined across tracked pools. Individual pools can have much less liquidity; the total is not an executable exit quote.
Market snapshot · Observation time unavailable · Snapshot values are not live quotes.
Per-pool amounts were not recorded in this snapshot. The total must not be read as the primary pool's liquidity.
▥ Quick Facts
Key metrics for a quick assessment.▣ Why Rug.Tools says this
Top native findingsAnalysis Status
2/6 evidence groups resolved. Publication does not mean every check is verified.

“I can't tell you much from what's on-chain right now.”
- Symbol
- HACKHOUSE
- Contract
- 9zRNZjZZC94Rgw1ddwzfvqkdJDQpmn9rhmGiqPyVpump
- Chain
- Solana
- Launchpad
- Pump.fun
- Holders
- 194
- Top Wallet
- 3.6%
- Top 10
- 21.8%
- Creator
- 0.00%
- Pool-held token supply
- 41.23%
Explore holder analysis, wallet relationships, liquidity evidence, contract history and more.
Advanced wallet & evidence view▾
Left: created or funded this token. Right: holds part of its supply today.
Follow the arrows: who created the token, and where the supply sits today.
- ◉ Holder distribution resolved
Largest measured holder account: 3.6%.
- ♙ Creator identified
- ◫ Liquidity pool verified on-chain
- ⌗ Bundle evidence limited
Currently sits at 194 holders. The largest sampled holder account holds 3.6%; independent control is unverified. The creator wallet is identified, the observed pool is about 1 hour old.
Report overview & findings
Full narrative and supporting findings
Key Findings
🔍 Detail FindingsOnly one market data source sees this token — cross-check before trading.
We can see liquidity-pool wallets on-chain, but DexScreener isn't returning market data for this token yet. This is common for very new tokens or tokens on smaller venues. Verify pricing on a second source before you trade.
Medium Concentration: top-ten sampled accounts hold 21.82% of supply.
Percentages use total token supply and the sampled holder population, excluding classified pools, burns and protocol accounts. Separate addresses may share a controller. Price impact depends on liquidity and trade size.
Largest sampled account holds 3.57% of supply.
Largest account below 10%. This describes one account, not the overall holder distribution. Percentages use total token supply and the sampled holder population, excluding classified pools, burns and protocol accounts. Separate addresses may share a controller. Price impact depends on liquidity and trade size.
Observed trading pool is under 24 hours old — evidence is preliminary.
This is the observed trading-pool timestamp, not verified mint age. Limited observation history can restrict confidence; pool age alone does not establish safety or risk.
Overview
Hacker House
$HACKHOUSEThis observed trading pool is less than 24 hours old (1 hour old). Pool creation does not establish the token’s mint age. Some blockchain signals are not yet available and the analysis may change as more activity occurs.
Holders & connected wallets
Top 10 individuals: 21.8%Population & measurement scope
Percentages use total token supply. Classified liquidity pools, burn addresses and protocol accounts are excluded from this holder population. Separate addresses may share a controller.
Advanced details▾
Liquidity protection
Not verifiedLP lock or burn protection has not been verified. Missing evidence does not mean liquidity is unlocked.
Ownership, protection & source evidence
A live liquidity pool was identified on-chain, but LP token lock or burn status could not be verified for this pool. Liquidity protection is reported as Unknown rather than estimated, and unverified LP is not counted as a risk signal on its own.
Protection applies only to the measured pool or position; it does not establish overall token safety.
Creator intelligence
Creator identifiedDjM7Tu7whh6P3pGVBfDzwXAx2zaw51GJWrJE3PwtuN7s(DjM7…uN7s)Historical creator balance: 0.00% of the supply at that time
At the previous recorded mint update · 2026-10-30 15:27:51 UTC · slot 463335581
A historical balance alone does not establish a sale, current ownership or a scam.
Developer network could not be fully verified
Wallet-link evidence is incomplete. Missing evidence is not treated as safe.
Incomplete wallet evidence does not lower the overall risk verdict.
Inspect wallet links & supporting evidence▾
- • Verified creator wallet currently holds 0.00%
DjM7Tu…wtuN7s · verified attributionCoverage note: connected-wallet relationships are still loading.
Wallet relationships are one risk category. The overall Rug.Tools verdict can still be High Risk because of contract controls, trading restrictions, liquidity, holder concentration, or other evidence. A dominant holder is a concentration risk; one large wallet alone is not proof that several wallets are connected.
Presentation-only · does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict
Launch activity
Historical exposure and current holdingsLaunch & wallet evidence
Native evidence explorer
Launch, wallet flows & liquidity custody
Inspect what was observed, which balances were measured, and what remains unverified. Timing and transfers alone do not establish common ownership or a sale.
Investigate creator trades & token transfers
Forensic intelligence / Activity
What did the developer actually do?
Separate current holdings, historical launch exposure, verified sales and token transfers. Follow the receipts before drawing conclusions.
- Creator holdings
- 0.00%
- Historical launch exposure
- Unknown
Saved balance measurement; separate from sale history
Observed launch-group share of total token supply; not every graph node, developer sales or present insider ownership
Developer sales: Insufficient Evidence · Trading integrity: Not Scored. A creator holding 0% does not establish whether tokens were sold or transferred.
Launch evidence
0 stored cohort rows
Receipt-level replay was not stored for this snapshot.
Current cohort balances
Unknown
Recipient cohort not recorded
Observation time unavailable
Custody coverage
1 custody accounts / markets
1 without verified protection
Token custody and LP withdrawal protection are separate checks.
Creator provenance
DjM7Tu…uN7s · 0.00% current measured holdings
Attribution: mint_transaction. Identified wallet only; this does not establish total team ownership.
Launch timeline & receipt references
This older snapshot contains a recipient cohort, not the full receipt timeline. Counts and timing describe only the stored sample. Exact interval supply figures and transaction references remain unknown until a bounded native replay records them.
Pool-by-pool custody & protection
41.23% of token supply in custody · reported role / market · vault AJXnk8…9gsa
Token custody does not verify LP position ownership, locks or withdrawal protection.
Measured wallet balances & transfer evidence
A measured zero balance does not prove a sale. Unknown balances are not zero. Only 0 stored sample rows are listed; aggregate coverage includes missing rows.
| Recipient | Current balance | First position | Receipt references |
|---|
Source snapshot: . This evidence explorer does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict. Existing risk findings, verification gates and source timestamps remain authoritative.
RugGraph / Wallet intelligenceLinked-wallet graph13 wallets · 0 transaction references. Follow the receipts from saved launch evidence.Open wallet graph ↓
01 / Launch activity
Select a wallet to see its activity near token launch. Early receipt of tokens alone does not prove a sniper purchase.
Cyan: tokens received · Amber: tokens moved out · Dashed: deployment. Lines connect wallets to the launch sample; they do not identify who sent the tokens. The first 12 wallets are plotted; every listed wallet can be inspected below.
DjM7Tu7whh6P3pGVBfDzwXAx2zaw51GJWrJE3PwtuN7s
Creator attribution
Balance at last observation
Unknown
Time unavailable · observation, not a live balance
No transaction reference was stored for this wallet. No relationship is inferred.
Creator balance history
2026-10-30 15:27:51 UTC · previous mint write
Exact on-chain amounts
0 / 999999999999999 raw units
Checkpoints show historical balances. A reduction does not establish a sale. Launching multiple tokens does not establish malicious intent.
02 / Funding connections
Where did the funding come from?
Follow verified transfers back up to three wallets. Select any connected wallet to explore its evidence.
Evidence first. Ownership stays unproven.
A transfer proves funds moved between addresses. It does not prove they belong to the same person. Known exchange, bridge and pool accounts are marked as infrastructure.
How to read this evidence
Arrows show receipt references associated with the launch sample. They do not identify transfer counterparties or establish common ownership.
An early recipient is not necessarily a buyer or sniper. Outflows may be transfers; these summaries do not establish realized sales.
Balance measurements retain their original timestamps. Historical launch exposure is separate from present holdings.
Funding paths, verified swap activity and volume manipulation require additional transaction evidence. Missing history is unknown.
Source snapshot: 2026-10-30 15:30:48 UTC · Funding research runs only when requested.
Contract & risk evidence
No flagged controls detectedAnalysis
Checks Incomplete — This token has not completed a full verified scan yet.
Recorded score inputs & context▾
Legacy score inputs are retained for audit. The canonical verdict, required evidence gates and confidence are assessed separately. Age and metadata alone do not establish risk.
- Medium Concentration: top-ten sampled accounts hold 21.82% of supply.0 recorded score points
- Liquidity pool detected correctly0 recorded score points
- Largest sampled account holds 3.57% of supply.0 recorded score points
Name, symbol, image and description are all present on-chain.
Percentages use total token supply and the sampled holder population, excluding classified pools, burns and protocol accounts. Separate addresses may share a controller. Price impact depends on liquidity and trade size.
Analysis coverage
2/6 stored evidence groups resolved- Holders & Ownership · evidence verified
- Creator Identification · evidence verified
- Insider & Bundle · limited / unavailable
- Market Data · limited / unavailable
- Liquidity Protection · limited / unavailable
- Canonical Report · limited / unavailable
Canonical module details are unavailable in this older snapshot. A completed scan is not proof of safety. Missing evidence stays unknown; confirmed risk findings still apply.
Confidence measures the support, quality and freshness of the report evidence, not token safety or proof of wallet relationships.
- • primary pool under 24 hours; mint age is not established by this timestamp
Chart & market details
Price, volume, liquidity and venue
Market
More market data▾
Price chart
Load verified candle history to explore price and volume directly in this report.
Market activity
Recent trades and participating wallets · Birdeye
Loaded only when requested. No background refresh.
Contract metadata & token accounts
Supply, decimals, descriptions and holder records
Blockchain
Description▾
The house of hacking
Largest token accounts▾
BjC5…J2kLB1ZM…sQnX7Hmk…JiGQBoHF…8mCD6Wxi…HBug| # | Type | Wallet | % | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 💧Pump.fun LP | Pump.fun Bonding Curve BjC5…J2kLTrading liquidity, not an individual holder | 41.23% | |
| 2 | ?Unclassified | Unclassified Account B1ZM…sQnXRug.Tools could not confidently identify this account | 3.57% | |
| 3 | ?Unclassified | Unclassified Account 7Hmk…JiGQRug.Tools could not confidently identify this account | 2.89% | |
| 4 | ?Unclassified | Unclassified Account BoHF…8mCDRug.Tools could not confidently identify this account | 2.59% | |
| 5 | ?Unclassified | Unclassified Account 6Wxi…HBugRug.Tools could not confidently identify this account | 2.50% |
Related reports & provenance
Related tokens and report synchronization
Related tokens to investigate
Tokens with similar creator, launchpad, wallet activity, or risk signals.
