Ownership
Top 10: 13.9%

87wamMPCTf1399DZWxBD5YYz6YcE3cPyk5iBjUSeWAraShareThe token is actively trading, but a launch-pattern cluster acquired 27.3% of supply, but independent wallet linkage is not fully corroborated.

“Something's a little off. Proceed carefully.”
The main evidence in this report
Coordinated activity
Well Distributed · Top 10: 13.9% (Low Concentration)
Verified from liquidity ownership evidence
Current wallet holdings and historical launch exposure measure different moments. Open the full analysis for funding links, LP protection and source evidence.
Independent token signals. The Rug.Tools verdict stays based on its own analysis.
GMGN counted 29 sniper wallets among the wallets it classified. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
60 wallets tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.
6 known-influencer/KOL wallets currently hold this token according to GMGN. This is market intelligence, not a safety credit.
Fresh Wallets: 1000 · 1000 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
Bot Wallets: 448 · 448 wallets are tagged by GMGN as automated/bot wallets. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
Bundler Trading Activity: 2.2% · GMGN independently estimates 2.2% of trading volume is bot-bundled activity. Corroborating signal only — Rug.Tools' native bundle/launch detection remains primary.
Bonding curve complete · 100% progressed
GMGN supplemental: 2.2% bundler trading activity observed independently by GMGN (low-level activity). This does not replace or merge with Rug.Tools' native bundle detection above.
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Top 10: 13.9%
11 linked wallets
2.2% bundler activity · GMGNSupplemental
2 LP wallets identified on-chain
Lock / burn protection: see liquidity evidence
Creator wallet unavailable, but GMGN reports historical creator activity
SPARKY — SPARKY · 649Fz6…pump · GMGN supplementalSupplemental
4/6 report modules have resolved evidence.

“Something's a little off. Proceed carefully.”
Explore holder analysis, wallet relationships, liquidity evidence, contract history and more.
Left: created or funded this token. Right: holds part of its supply today.
Follow the arrows: who created the token, and where the supply sits today.
Largest individual wallet: 2.5%.
Currently sits at 1.0K holders. Supply is spread across many wallets (top holder 2.5%) and early-buyer coordination was detected. The creator wallet could not be verified.

100.0% of LP tokens are verified locked or burned, so the pool cannot be pulled by the holder.
Source: Pump.fun migration proof (on-chain)
creators or authorities field, so the creator wallet cannot be identified.Launch activity was checked, but some wallet-link evidence is unavailable. Coordinated wallets cannot be ruled out.
Incomplete wallet evidence does not lower the overall risk verdict.
No relationship evidence was strong enough to list.
Coverage note: launch bundle evidence is incomplete; connected-wallet relationships are still loading; combined bundle balances have not been fully verified.
Wallet relationships are one risk category. The overall Rug.Tools verdict can still be High Risk because of contract controls, trading restrictions, liquidity, holder concentration, or other evidence. A dominant holder is a concentration risk; one large wallet alone is not proof that several wallets are connected.
Presentation-only · does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict
Wallets are only listed when they share funding, were funded by the creator, bought near-identical amounts, or bought in the same block. Buying early alone is not enough to be flagged. Confidence rises as more on-chain data becomes available. Cached for 24 hours.
GMGN supplemental: 2.2% bundler trading activity observed independently by GMGN (low-level activity). This does not replace or merge with Rug.Tools' native bundle detection above.
This token currently shows very few visible on-chain risk indicators. No single wallet controls a large share of the visible supply.
The largest individual wallet holds 2.49% of the supply, while the top 10 combined hold 13.86%. This means that no single holder has enough influence to significantly affect the token price.
There are two liquidity pools identified on-chain, with the largest liquidity pool comprising 10.62%. These liquidity pool wallets are excluded from the concentration math.
All on-chain metadata is complete, with no missing fields noted.
This report reflects only publicly available blockchain information and should not be considered financial advice.
Name, symbol, image and description are all present on-chain.
No single wallet dominates the visible supply in the analyzed holder coverage.
Recent trades and participating wallets · Birdeye
Loaded only when requested. No background refresh.
Fees to @iammarcmalone via UsePaid
9c5R…p6XzAYZr…7xzN6ckZ…NtdkJ56M…9Fxf2xjB…kQyT| # | Type | Wallet | % | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 💧Pump.fun AMM | Pump.fun AMM Pool 9c5R…p6XzTrading liquidity, not an individual holder | 10.62% | |
| 2 | 👤Individual | Individual Wallet AYZr…7xzNRug.Tools could not confidently identify this account | 2.49% | |
| 3 | 👤Individual | Individual Wallet 6ckZ…NtdkRug.Tools could not confidently identify this account | 2.17% | |
| 4 | 👤Individual | Individual Wallet J56M…9FxfRug.Tools could not confidently identify this account | 1.60% | |
| 5 | 👤Individual | Individual Wallet 2xjB…kQyTRug.Tools could not confidently identify this account | 1.32% |
Tokens with similar creator, launchpad, wallet activity, or risk signals.