Fresh scan in progress — verifying on-chain evidence. Showing the previous report.
Checks Incomplete
A Healthy rating could not be verified: holder concentration is unavailable. This is not evidence the token is unsafe — the required checks did not resolve.
“Not enough evidence yet. I'd wait for more data.”
- •Token is less than a day old — early analysis, treat with caution.
The main evidence in this report
Verified from liquidity ownership evidence
Risk findings remain visible even when other modules lack evidence. Open the full report for wallet, contract, creator and liquidity sources.
GMGN intelligence
Independent token signals. The Rug.Tools verdict stays based on its own analysis.
GMGN counted 6 sniper wallets among the wallets it classified. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
7 wallets tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.
540 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
View 1 more GMGN signals
Bot Wallets: 27 · 27 wallets are tagged by GMGN as automated/bot wallets. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
Wallet Trade Context
Trade context is unavailable for this sample. Your token report remains available.
Pending ActivityEXPERIMENTAL
Sampled mempool observations, not continuous monitoring. Transactions may fail, be replaced, be cancelled or never confirm. Simulation does not prove confirmation or a completed trade. Pending evidence never changes the main verdict.
Reading stored pending observations…
Detailed reportFull Token AnalysisWallet links, holder distribution, liquidity protection, creator activity, contract controls and source evidence.Open report ↓Close report ↑
Risk Snapshot
The most important report signals in one place. Detailed evidence stays below; this presentation does not recompute or alter the canonical Rug.Tools verdict.
Not flagged as a honeypot, however token is less than a day old — early analysis, treat with caution. Currently sits at $129.5K in liquidity, $1.54M traded in the last 24h. The creator wallet could not be verified, the token is 4 days old.
Why this verdict?▾
- No dataLargest Individual WalletIndividual holder data unavailable.
- No dataTop 10 WalletsTop 10 wallet concentration unavailable.
- NeutralSniper Wallets: 6GMGN counted 6 sniper wallets among the wallets it classified. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralSmart-Money Wallets: 77 wallets tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.
- NeutralFresh Wallets: 540540 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralBot Wallets: 2727 wallets are tagged by GMGN as automated/bot wallets. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralLiquidityLiquidity depth looks reasonable ($129,527).
- NeutralProject LifecycleProject is actively trading on-chain.
- NeutralContract SecurityNo critical contract flags detected.
Key Findings
⚪ Checks IncompleteLive Market Context
Price, liquidity, volume, venue and trading-tax context are grouped here instead of being repeated across the report.
Market Snapshot
Market activity
Recent trades and participating wallets · Birdeye
Loaded only when requested. No background refresh.
Wallet & Distribution Intelligence
Current holder concentration, connected-wallet evidence and launch-window coordination are kept together so current ownership is not confused with historical launch exposure.
Not Identified. LPs, lockers, bridges, exchanges and known contracts are excluded from individual concentration.
Connected Wallet Intelligence
Reading cached wallet relationships…
No Coordinated Launch Signal Observed
Module severity describes launch-pattern evidence and does not replace the overall Rug.Tools verdict.
Reconstructed from ERC-20 Transfer logs in the first 5,000 blocks after deployment. Initial distribution includes pools, lockers and other protocol contracts and is not evidence of insider control. Wallet exposure counts only non-contract recipients, and wallets are reported as coordinated only when they acquired supply in the same block.
Developer / Creator Intelligence
Creator attribution, current holdings, external creator facts and wallet-link evidence are correlated here without changing the canonical Rug.Tools verdict.
Possible connected-wallet cluster
6 wallets show relationship signals. Maximum observed launch exposure was 1.48%. Combined current holdings are unknown. This is a relationship signal, not proof that one developer controls every wallet.
Why RugGraph reached this conclusion▾
- • 6 wallets acquired in 2 same-block clusters
Coverage note: connected-wallet relationships are still loading.
Presentation-only · does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict
Liquidity & LP Protection
Trading depth and LP ownership/lock evidence are grouped together. Liquidity depth describes trading conditions; LP protection describes whether liquidity ownership can be verified.
100.0% of LP tokens are verified locked or burned, so the pool cannot be pulled by the holder.
Source: On-chain LP holders
Contract Controls
Direct contract and security-provider evidence. Unknown capabilities stay unknown and are never silently treated as safe.
Historical Pattern Review
Optional read-only comparison against archived launches and developer patterns. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Challenge this report with historical patterns
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Analysis Coverage
Core report evidence and extended intelligence are separated so a complete core report cannot be confused with an unavailable optional launch-history module.
Core evidence coverage measures whether required report checks resolved. It is not a safety score.