Only 5 of 7 analysis modules could be verified on Ethereum, so Rug.Tools cannot issue a complete safety-clear verdict for this token. Confirmed risk findings below still apply. Missing data is not counted as a new risk signal — and it is not evidence the token is safe either.
Verified below: market data from DexScreener.
Elevated Risk
Checks IncompleteThe token is actively trading, but one wallet controls 25.7% of supply, and the top 10 wallets control 44.1% of supply, and new tokens can be minted.
“This one has too many yellow flags for my liking.”
- •Owner can mint additional supply. Current authority could not be resolved.
- •Single wallet holds 25.7% of supply.
Challenge this report with historical patterns
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Liquidity depth looks reasonable, however single wallet holds 25.7% of supply. Currently sits at $189.1K in liquidity, $7.1K traded in the last 24h, 9.7K holders. The largest wallet controls 25.7% of supply. The creator wallet is confirmed and holds less than 1% of supply.
Why this verdict?▾
- + ConcernLargest Individual WalletOne wallet holds 25.7% of supply.
- + ConcernTop 10 WalletsTop 10 wallets hold 44.1% — high concentration.
- + ConcernContract SecurityOwner can mint new supply.
- NeutralSniper Wallets: 282GMGN counted 282 sniper wallets among the wallets it classified. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralSmart-Money Wallets: 11 wallet tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.
- NeutralFresh Wallets: 5050 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralLiquidityLiquidity depth looks reasonable ($189,071).
- NeutralProject LifecycleProject is actively trading on-chain.
Sum of the top 10 currently-classified individual wallets. LPs, lockers, bridges, exchanges and known contracts are excluded. Bare wallets that we haven't fingerprinted may still be exchange or team wallets.
Module statuses describe only that evidence area and never override the Overall Verdict.
Contract SecurityDirect on-chain reads complete · third-party security screening unavailable on Ethereum▾Attention
- ›Owner can mint additional supply
- ›Third-party security screening unavailable on Ethereum — honeypot, tax and provider-only privilege checks are not available on this chain
- ›Verification status unknown
- ›Tax unknown
- ›Not a proxy contract (EIP-1967 slot empty)
Holder ConcentrationLargest individual wallet holds 25.71%▾Concerning
- ›Liquidity pool holds 0.97% (excluded from concentration)
- ›25.71% — 0x174c…ed50
- ›13.52% — 0xb974…6929
- ›1.37% — 0x0abd…b1bb
- ›1.21% — 0x118a…7dce
LiquidityLiquidity depth looks reasonable▾Adequate Depth
- ›Total liquidity: $189,071
- ›LP data unavailable
- ›Primary venue: Uniswap V2
CreatorCreator holds less than 1% of supply▾Favorable Creator Signal
- ›Address: 0x1978…7623
- ›Source unknown
- ›Deployed 3.6 years ago
- ›Creator wallet age unknown
- ›Creator wallet has sent 7,848 transactions
- ›Owner unknown
Market Snapshot
Key Findings
🟠 Elevated Risk- ○On-Chain Contract Checks · One or more required native contract checks failed
- ✓Market data (DexScreener)
- ✓Holder distribution
- ✓Creator intelligence
- ○LP ownership · LP lock status could not be determined from available data
- ✓Token identity
- ✓Liquidity depth
Confidence reflects verified evidence coverage and evidence quality — not how safe the token is. Evidence Coverage counts resolved checklist items; it is not a second safety verdict.
No LP holder or lock data was returned for this token, so liquidity protection is Unknown rather than estimated. Unverified LP is a potential signal only and is not counted as evidence of a rug on its own.