RUG.TOOLS
RUG.TOOLS
Launchpad
Ethereum · ERC-20

Biconomy Token (BICO)

0xf17e65822b568b3903685a7c9f496cf7656cc6c2
Ethereum
Last scanned · 3 days ago

Scan results are a snapshot. Select Analyze Again to run a new scan.

Report ready · background verification continuing
The report below contains the evidence verified so far. Checks that could not be completed are marked Limited or Unavailable; background recovery may improve them automatically.
Rug.Tools VerdictSaved scan · 3 days ago

High Risk

A single holder account holds 28.3% of supply while transfers can be paused.

Scanned at 2026-10-28 04:55:01 UTC

Market conditions can change after a scan. Select Analyze Again to refresh.

Evidence confidence: LowSome checks unverified

Token controls unverified · Holder evidence incomplete · LP protection unverified · Evidence needs refreshing.

Verification gaps (8): Required verification checks are incomplete; category availability does not establish completed verification. · The report evidence is stale or its observation time is invalid; confidence is limited. · On-Chain Contract Checks: Required native contract evidence could not be fully verified · More in Evidence & Caveats below.

Ruggy reacting to a high risk verdict
Red Flags · Ranked by Importance

Evidence-backed reasons, ranked by recorded severity. Open Evidence & Caveats below for complete explanations and limits.

  1. High-Priority Risk

    1. Concentration and Transfer Controls

    A single holder account holds 28.3% of supply while transfers can be paused.

  2. Risk Indicator

    2. Largest Holder Account

    one holder account holds 28.3% of supply.

  3. Risk Indicator

    3. Sampled Holder Accounts

    sampled holder accounts hold 66.0% — high concentration.

  4. Risk Indicator

    4. Project Lifecycle

    Trading activity or liquidity is weakening.

    Why it matters: Weakening activity or liquidity can impair exits; deterioration alone is not proof of deliberate fraud.

  5. Risk Indicator

    5. Contract Security

    Owner can pause transfers.

    Why it matters: Contract privileges or transfer rules can change trading conditions. Review the verified capability and its limitations.

Bottom line

A single holder account holds 28.3% of supply while transfers can be paused.

Biggest concerns

holder concentration

Evidence & Caveats 5 recorded reasons · 8 verification gapsClick to expandExpanded

Recorded verdict explanation

A single holder account holds 28.3% of supply while transfers can be paused.

Some checks unverified: Token controls unverified · Holder evidence incomplete · LP protection unverified · Evidence needs refreshing.

  1. 1. Concentration and Transfer Controls · High

    A single holder account holds 28.3% of supply while transfers can be paused.

  2. 2. Largest Holder Account · Medium

    one holder account holds 28.3% of supply.

  3. 3. Sampled Holder Accounts · Medium

    sampled holder accounts hold 66.0% — high concentration.

  4. 4. Project Lifecycle · Medium

    Trading activity or liquidity is weakening.

    Why it matters: Weakening activity or liquidity can impair exits; deterioration alone is not proof of deliberate fraud.

  5. 5. Contract Security · Medium

    Owner can pause transfers.

    Why it matters: Contract privileges or transfer rules can change trading conditions. Review the verified capability and its limitations.

Evidence quality & missing verification

Data available: 6/8 modules. Data availability does not mean every required check was verified.

Confidence describes evidence quality, coverage and freshness.

  • Required verification checks are incomplete; category availability does not establish completed verification.
  • The report evidence is stale or its observation time is invalid; confidence is limited.
  • On-Chain Contract Checks: Required native contract evidence could not be fully verified
  • LP ownership: LP lock status could not be determined from available data
  • critical contract-security fields are unknown
  • top-holder account identity is unverified
  • no verified locked or burned LP position was detected
  • the underlying evidence is stale and has not been re-verified

Ruggy commentary

“Serious problems here. Do not treat this as a normal token.”
Follow Rug.Tools & discuss this reportDiscuss in Discord ↗

Coverage note: Liquidity protection is unverified. No verified locked or burned LP position was established.

Market snapshot & additional signals
Scan at a glance

Market snapshot & key evidence

Report confidence: LowData available: 6/8 categories
Price
$0.0157
24h price change: +6.1%
Market cap
$15.71M
Total tracked liquidity
$32.5K
Combined across 2 tracked pools. Individual pairs can have much less liquidity.
24h volume
$780.30
Holders
8,003
Token age
1794d

Primary pool · sushiswap

$28,729.48

0x55D8E…361E9 · Compare this pool ↗

Total tracked liquidity

$32,507.25

Combined across tracked pools. Individual pools can have much less liquidity; the total is not an executable exit quote.

Market snapshot · · Snapshot values are not live quotes.

Compare tracked pools (2)

Important signals

Recorded facts · open cards for evidence
Contract Security
Owner can pause all transfers
Holder Concentration
Largest holder account holds 28.32%

Sampled holder accounts: 66.0% · lower bound after infrastructure exclusions

Creator
Identified creator wallet holds 0% of supply
LP protection
Not verified

No protective claim without on-chain proof

Risk findings remain visible even when other modules lack evidence. Open the full report for wallet, contract, creator and liquidity sources.

Detailed reportFull analysis & source evidenceWallet links, holder distribution, liquidity protection, creator activity, contract controls and source evidence.Expand full analysis ↓

Explore the evidence

Supplemental intelligence

Provider and wallet context
Supplemental source · GMGN

GMGN intelligence

Independent token signals. The Rug.Tools verdict stays based on its own analysis.

Unavailable

Native launch analysis reconstructs a sampled launch-window wallet cohort as a percentage of token supply. GMGN bundler activity estimates a share of trading volume using its own wallet tags; its observation window and population are not established as equivalent. No native pattern in a sample does not rule out GMGN activity. Neither signal alone proves shared funding, bundle execution or insider ownership.

GMGN has not returned data for this token. Your scan and verdict remain available.

Wallet Trade Context

Loading trade context separately from your scan…

Pending ActivityEXPERIMENTAL

Sampled mempool observations, not continuous monitoring. Transactions may fail, be replaced, be cancelled or never confirm. Simulation does not prove confirmation or a completed trade. Pending evidence never changes the main verdict.

Reading stored pending observations…

Risk Snapshot

Report overview
Report overview

Risk Snapshot

The most important report signals in one place. Detailed evidence stays below; this presentation does not recompute or alter the canonical Rug.Tools verdict.

Executive Summary

Buy/sell simulation passed at block 26288965, however owner can pause all transfers. Current authority could not be resolved. Currently sits at $32.5K in liquidity, $780 traded in the last 24h, 8.0K holders. The largest wallet controls 28.3% of supply. The creator wallet could not be verified.

Contract Controls
Owner can pause all transfers
Recent sells verified on the selected pool
Holder Distribution
Largest wallet 28.32%
Sampled holder accounts: 66.0%
Liquidity
$32.5K
Combined across 2 tracked pools. Individual pairs can have much less liquidity. · LP locked/burned: 0%
Creator / Deployer
0x7f3b…4138
Current holding: 0.00%
Launch Patterns
Launch history not verified
Unavailable evidence is not treated as clean
Why this verdict?
▾
  • Concentration and Transfer Controls
    A single holder account holds 28.3% of supply while transfers can be paused.
    + High risk
  • Largest Holder Account
    one holder account holds 28.3% of supply.
    + Concern
  • Sampled Holder Accounts
    sampled holder accounts hold 66.0% — high concentration.
    + Concern
  • Project Lifecycle
    Trading activity or liquidity is weakening.
    + Concern
  • Contract Security
    Owner can pause transfers.
    + Concern
  • Liquidity
    Liquidity depth looks reasonable ($32,507).
    Neutral
Rule-based breakdown. Missing data is shown as No data and is not treated as a negative signal. Context-only conditions never cancel an independent risk concern.

Key Findings

🔴 High Risk
  • Owner can pause all transfers. Current authority could not be resolved.
  • Single holder holds 28.3% of supply.

    One holder controlling a quarter of supply can crash the price on exit.

  • Proxy/delegated execution detected.

    Execution uses another implementation. Proxy detection alone does not establish whether it can be changed or who controls it; implementation privileges remain subject to separate checks.

  • Liquidity protection is unverified.

    Liquidity protection is unverified. No verified locked or burned LP position was established.

Show all 7 findings
  • Liquidity depth looks reasonable.
  • Identified creator wallet currently holds 0% of supply.

    This measures only the identified creator wallet; total team or connected-wallet ownership is not established by this metric.

  • Buy/sell simulation passed at block 26288965.

    One simulated trade passed on the tested route and trade size. This does not verify liquidity protection, insider ownership or future selling conditions.

Live Market Context

Market & trading
Market & trading

Live Market Context

Price, liquidity, volume, venue and trading-tax context are grouped here instead of being repeated across the report.

Quick Facts
Source Verification
Unknown
Honeypot
Recent sells verified
Trading Liquidity
$32,507

Market Snapshot

Price
$0.0157
24h Change
+6.1%
Market Cap
$15.71M
Primary Pool 24h Volume
$780.30
Total tracked liquidity
$32.5K
Combined across 2 tracked pools. Individual pairs can have much less liquidity.
DEX
SushiSwap

Market activity

Recent trades and participating wallets · Birdeye

Loaded only when requested. No background refresh.

Holders & connected wallets

Wallet intelligence
Wallet intelligence

Wallet & Distribution Intelligence

Current holder concentration, connected-wallet evidence and launch-window coordination are kept together so current ownership is not confused with historical launch exposure.

Largest holder account
28.32%
Sampled holder accounts
66.0%
Holder coverage
Indexed balance sample

High Concentration. Adjusted concentration excludes identified pools and burn sinks; other custody is retained when independent control is unverified.

Top Holders
#1? Unknown kind0xf977…acec28.32%
#2? Unknown kind0x6270…c12a8.63%
#3? Unknown kind0x91d4…debe6.44%
#4? Unknown kind0x6b07…bb5f6.12%
#5? Unknown kind0xf42a…f1733.80%
#6? Unknown kind0x7108…1ab02.75%
#7? Unknown kind0x15da…b0d72.61%
#8? Unknown kind0x611f…b09d2.50%
#9? Unknown kind0x0d07…92fe2.45%
#10🏦 Exchange role unverifiedCoinbase Hot Wallet (deployment unverified) · 0xa9d1…3e432.34%
Legend:👤 Creator🔥 Burn🏛 Protocol custody💧 LP role unverified🏦 Exchange role unverified📄 Contract🧑 Account? Unknown kind

Connected Wallet Intelligence

Reading cached wallet relationships…

Native evidence explorer

Launch, wallet flows & liquidity custody

Inspect what was observed, which balances were measured, and what remains unverified. Timing and transfers alone do not establish common ownership or a sale.

ethereum
Investigate creator trades & token transfers

Forensic intelligence / Activity

What did the developer actually do?

Separate current holdings, historical launch exposure, verified sales and token transfers. Follow the receipts before drawing conclusions.

Trade history unavailable
Creator holdings
0.00%

Saved balance measurement; separate from sale history

Historical launch exposure
Unknown

Observed launch-group share of total token supply; not every graph node, developer sales or present insider ownership

Developer sales: Insufficient Evidence · Trading integrity: Not Scored. A creator holding 0% does not establish whether tokens were sold or transferred.

Launch evidence

0 stored cohort rows

Unknown

Receipt-level replay was not stored for this snapshot.

Current cohort balances

Unknown

Recipient cohort not recorded

Custody coverage

1 custody accounts / markets

1 without verified protection

Token custody and LP withdrawal protection are separate checks.

Creator provenance

0x7f3b…4138 · 0.00% current measured holdings

Attribution: routescan-contract-creation. Identified wallet only; this does not establish total team ownership.

Deployment receipt: 0x590a…8669

Launch timeline & receipt references
First 10 recipients: Unknown
First 20 recipients: Unknown
First 10 elapsed: Unknown

This older snapshot contains a recipient cohort, not the full receipt timeline. Counts and timing describe only the stored sample. Exact interval supply figures and transaction references remain unknown until a bounded native replay records them.

Pool-by-pool custody & protection
Selected market · 0x55d8…61e9
Position protection unverified

Pool allocation not established · reported role / market

Market selection alone does not verify LP ownership, locks or the controller of this pool.

Measured wallet balances & transfer evidence

A measured zero balance does not prove a sale. Unknown balances are not zero. Only 0 stored sample rows are listed; aggregate coverage includes missing rows.

RecipientCurrent balanceFirst positionReceipt references

Source snapshot: . This evidence explorer does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict. Existing risk findings, verification gates and source timestamps remain authoritative.

1Choose a wallet
2Inspect its transactions
3Trace its funding
Historical launch-group exposure
Unknown
Wallet coverage
Saved wallet sample
Creator history
0 balance snapshots
Evidence status
History unavailable

01 / Launch activity

Select a wallet to see its activity near token launch. Early receipt of tokens alone does not prove a sniper purchase.

LAUNCHreceipt sampleCREATOR0x7f3…4138HOLDER0xf97…acecHOLDER0x627…c12aHOLDER0x91d…debeHOLDER0x6b0…bb5fHOLDER0xf42…f173HOLDER0x710…1ab0HOLDER0x15d…b0d7HOLDER0x611…b09dHOLDER0x0d0…92feHOLDER0xa9d…3e43

Cyan: tokens received · Amber: tokens moved out · Dashed: deployment. Lines connect wallets to the launch sample; they do not identify who sent the tokens.

Selected wallet

0x7f3b192ab3220940d66236792f3ebdb0e4e74138

Creator attribution

Balance at last observation

Unknown

Time unavailable · observation, not a live balance

Supporting transactions (1)

02 / Funding connections

Where did the funding come from?

Follow verified transfers back up to three wallets. Select any connected wallet to explore its evidence.

Evidence first. Ownership stays unproven.

A transfer proves funds moved between addresses. It does not prove they belong to the same person. Known exchange, bridge and pool accounts are marked as infrastructure.

How to read this evidence

Arrows show receipt references associated with the launch sample. They do not identify transfer counterparties or establish common ownership.

An early recipient is not necessarily a buyer or sniper. Outflows may be transfers; these summaries do not establish realized sales.

Balance measurements retain their original timestamps. Historical launch exposure is separate from present holdings.

Funding paths, verified swap activity and volume manipulation require additional transaction evidence. Missing history is unknown.

Source snapshot: 2026-10-28 04:55:01 UTC · Funding research runs only when requested.

Launch activity

Launch exposure, linked wallets and current holdings
Launch coordination
Launch history could not be fully verified
Unavailable

No launch-window Transfer logs were returned; launch exposure could not be verified Missing launch evidence is never interpreted as a clean or low-risk result.

Creation block #13,354,549Window target 5,000 blocks

Creator intelligence

Developer intelligence
Developer intelligence

Developer / Creator Intelligence

Creator attribution, current holdings, external creator facts and wallet-link evidence are correlated here without changing the canonical Rug.Tools verdict.

On-chain deployer
Attribution unverified
Current holding
0.00%
First observed
2018-12-13
Transactions
733
Deployment tx
0x590a…8669
GMGN attribution · independently unverified

May refer to a different wallet or observation time. Reported exits do not establish verified sales or override measured on-chain holdings.

GMGN supplemental intelligence unavailable for this token right now

RugGraph · Developer Network Intelligence

Developer network could not be fully verified

Limited Coverage

Wallet-link evidence is incomplete. Missing evidence is not treated as safe.

Incomplete wallet evidence does not lower the overall risk verdict.

Tracked wallets with signals
Unknown
Historical launch exposure
Unknown
Largest measured group holdings
Unknown
Creator association
Unknown
Inspect wallet links & supporting evidence▾

No relationship evidence was strong enough to list.

Creator wallet: 0x7f3b…e74138 · attribution limited

Coverage note: No launch-window Transfer logs were returned; launch exposure could not be verified; connected-wallet relationships are still loading.

Wallet relationships are one risk category. The overall Rug.Tools verdict can still be High Risk because of contract controls, trading restrictions, liquidity, holder concentration, or other evidence. A dominant holder is a concentration risk; one large wallet alone is not proof that several wallets are connected.

Presentation-only · does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict

Liquidity & LP Protection

Liquidity
Liquidity

Liquidity & LP Protection

Trading depth and LP ownership/lock evidence are grouped together. Liquidity depth describes trading conditions; LP protection describes whether liquidity ownership can be verified.

Total tracked liquidity: $32.5K. Combined across 2 tracked pools. Individual pairs can have much less liquidity.
LP Ownership
Protected
0%
Verified unlocked
—
Unknown
100.00%
LP-token balance observations · 1 holders · 1 burn sink. Percentages reflect LP-token supply.
Burn 0x0000…0000🔥 Burned0%
A locker balance does not establish an active lock or its expiry. Unverified balances are neither confirmed locked nor confirmed unlocked.
LP ownership & withdrawal protection
Unknown

LP lock or burn protection has not been verified. Missing evidence does not mean liquidity is unlocked.

Ownership, protection & source evidence
LP Status
Not verified
LP Owner
Not identified
% Protected
Not verified
Unlock Date
Not verified

No LP holder or lock data was returned for this token, so liquidity protection is Unknown rather than estimated. Unverified LP is a potential signal only and is not counted as evidence of a rug on its own.

Protection applies only to the measured pool or position; it does not establish overall token safety.

Source: On-chain LP holders

Contract & trading controls

Contract
Contract

Contract Controls

Direct contract and security-provider evidence. Unknown capabilities stay unknown and are never silently treated as safe.

Verified On-Chain Checks
✓Deployment TransactionDeployment Verified
✓Creator WalletVerified
✓Proxy CheckProxy: Yes
✓Owner CheckOwner result unavailable
Implementation: 0x95cc3a10636c5bdffe4045d7bf00efb787e1bbe1
Read directly from Ethereum via RPC at scan time. These observations do not establish unverified contract permissions.
Contract Security · Detail
HoneypotRecent sells verified
Verified SourceUnknown
MintableUnknown
PausableYes
Modifiable TaxUnknown
Reclaim OwnershipUnknown
BlacklistUnknown
SelfdestructUnknown
ProxyYes → 0x95cc3a10636c5bdffe4045d7bf00efb787e1bbe1
Some contract-security capabilities could not be verified. Unknown contract fields remain unknown; holder coverage is reported separately.

Historical Pattern Review

Historical intelligence
Historical intelligence

Historical Pattern Review

Optional read-only comparison against archived launches and developer patterns. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.

Optional Forensic Review

Challenge this report with historical patterns

Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.

Sources & coverage

Evidence quality
Evidence quality

Analysis Coverage

Core report evidence and extended intelligence are separated so a complete core report cannot be confused with an unavailable optional launch-history module.

Core report evidence
6/8 checks with usable evidence
Confidence Low
On-Chain Contract ChecksUnverified
Market data (DexScreener)Evidence available
Holder distributionEvidence available
Creator intelligenceEvidence available
LP ownershipUnverified
Token identityEvidence available
Liquidity depthEvidence available
Honeypot screeningEvidence available

Usable evidence can be partial. These counts do not mean every contract permission, sell restriction or liquidity position was verified.

Extended intelligence
Holder depthTop-10 coverage
Launch historyUnavailable

Launch history: No launch-window Transfer logs were returned; launch exposure could not be verified. Missing extended evidence is never interpreted as a clean signal.