High Risk
Limited DataA single individual wallet controls 54.1% of supply.
“🚨 Dangerous signal detected. This has real red flags.”
- •Single wallet controls 54.1% of supply.
- •Top 10 wallets hold 96.7% — high concentration.
Challenge this report with historical patterns
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Liquidity depth looks reasonable, however single wallet holds 54.1% of supply. Currently sits at $631.4K in liquidity, $482.6K traded in the last 24h, 9.7K holders. The largest wallet controls 54.1% of supply. The identified creator wallet holds less than 1% of supply, but total team or connected-wallet ownership is not established.
Why this verdict?▾
- + High riskLargest Individual WalletSingle wallet controls 54.1% of supply.
- + ConcernTop 10 WalletsTop 10 wallets hold 96.7% — high concentration.
- NeutralBundler Trading Activity: 0.7%GMGN independently estimates 0.7% of trading volume is bot-bundled activity. Corroborating signal only — Rug.Tools' native bundle/launch detection remains primary.
- NeutralSniper Wallets: 1000GMGN counted 1000 sniper wallets among the wallets it classified. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralSmart-Money Wallets: 218218 wallets tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.
- NeutralKOL / Renowned Wallets: 7070 known-influencer/KOL wallets currently hold this token according to GMGN. This is market intelligence, not a safety credit.
- NeutralFresh Wallets: 787787 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralBot Wallets: 10411041 wallets are tagged by GMGN as automated/bot wallets. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralLiquidityLiquidity depth looks reasonable ($631,362).
- NeutralProject LifecycleProject is actively trading on-chain.
- NeutralContract SecurityNo critical contract flags detected.
Sum of the top 10 currently-classified individual wallets. LPs, lockers, bridges, exchanges and known contracts are excluded. Bare wallets that we haven't fingerprinted may still be exchange or team wallets.
Module statuses describe only that evidence area and never override the Overall Verdict.
Contract SecurityDirect on-chain reads complete · third-party security screening unavailable on BNB Chain▾Partial Coverage
- ›Third-party security screening unavailable on BNB Chain — honeypot, tax and provider-only privilege checks are not available on this chain
- ›Verification status unknown
- ›Tax unknown
- ›Not a proxy contract (EIP-1967 slot empty)
Holder ConcentrationLargest individual wallet holds 54.14%▾Concerning
- ›No LP holder identified
- ›54.14% — 0x8894…d4e3
- ›25.36% — 0xf977…acec
- ›12.29% — 0xe2fc…3ae1
- ›1.26% — 0xf8e9…81e8
LiquidityLiquidity depth looks reasonable▾Adequate Depth
- ›Total liquidity: $631,362
- ›LP data unavailable
- ›Primary venue: PancakeSwap V2
CreatorIdentified creator wallet holds 0% of supply▾Pending
- ›Address: 0xa424…7e5b
- ›Source unknown
- ›Deployed 2 month(s) ago
- ›Creator wallet age unknown
- ›Creator wallet has sent 137,903 transactions
- ›This measures only the identified creator wallet; total team or connected-wallet ownership is not established
- ›Owner unknown
Market Snapshot
Key Findings
🔴 High Risk- ✓On-Chain Contract Checks
- ✓Market data (DexScreener)
- ✓Holder distribution
- ✓Creator intelligence
- ○LP ownership · LP lock status could not be determined from available data
- ✓Token identity
- ✓Liquidity depth
Confidence reflects verified evidence coverage and evidence quality — not how safe the token is. Evidence Coverage counts resolved checklist items; it is not a second safety verdict.
No LP holder or lock data was returned for this token, so liquidity protection is Unknown rather than estimated. Unverified LP is a potential signal only and is not counted as evidence of a rug on its own.
Analysis Unavailable
Bundle analysis unavailable — Launch-window Transfer log coverage is incomplete. Missing evidence is never treated as low risk.
