
Elevated Risk
Multiple health signals are weakening, and liquidity is very thin, so trades will move the price sharply.

“Several warning signs stacking up. I'd think twice.”
- •Trading risk: very thin liquidity — even small trades will move the price.
Challenge this report with historical patterns
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Developer network could not be fully verified
Wallet-link evidence is incomplete. Missing evidence is not treated as safe.
Incomplete wallet evidence does not lower the overall risk verdict.
Why RugGraph reached this conclusion▾
No relationship evidence was strong enough to list.
Coverage note: connected-wallet relationships are still loading.
Wallet relationships are one risk category. The overall Rug.Tools verdict can still be High Risk because of contract controls, trading restrictions, liquidity, holder concentration, or other evidence. A dominant holder is a concentration risk; one large wallet alone is not proof that several wallets are connected.
Presentation-only · does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict
Not flagged as a honeypot, however trading risk: very thin liquidity — even small trades will move the price. Currently sits at $4.5K in liquidity, $16 traded in the last 24h, 79 holders. Supply is spread across many wallets (top holder 3.9%). The creator wallet could not be verified, the token is approximately 12 days old.
Why this verdict?▾
- + ConcernProject LifecycleTrading activity or liquidity is weakening.
- + ConcernLiquidityVery thin liquidity ($4,466) — a trading risk (heavy slippage), not proof of a scam.
- NeutralBundler Trading Activity: 1.3%GMGN independently estimates 1.3% of trading volume is bot-bundled activity. Corroborating signal only — Rug.Tools' native bundle/launch detection remains primary.
- NeutralLargest Individual WalletLargest wallet holds 3.9% — well distributed.
- NeutralTop 10 WalletsTop 10 wallets hold 8.6% — low concentration.
- NeutralSniper Wallets: 7GMGN counted 7 sniper wallets among the wallets it classified. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralSmart-Money Wallets: 2727 wallets tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.
- NeutralKOL / Renowned Wallets: 1111 known-influencer/KOL wallets currently hold this token according to GMGN. This is market intelligence, not a safety credit.
- NeutralFresh Wallets: 132132 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralBot Wallets: 4242 wallets are tagged by GMGN as automated/bot wallets. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralContract SecurityNo critical contract flags detected.
Sum of the top 10 currently-classified individual wallets. LPs, lockers, bridges, exchanges and known contracts are excluded. Bare wallets that we haven't fingerprinted may still be exchange or team wallets.
Module statuses describe only that evidence area and never override the Overall Verdict.
Contract SecurityNo critical contract flags▾Partial Coverage
- ›Verification status unknown
- ›Tax: 1.0% buy / 1.0% sell
- ›Not a proxy contract (EIP-1967 slot empty)
Holder ConcentrationLargest individual wallet holds 3.86%▾Low Concentration
- ›Liquidity pool holds 90.64% (excluded from concentration)
- ›90.64% — DEX Pool
- ›3.86% — 0xdb8e…d928
- ›1.19% — 0x3eba…dccd
- ›0.90% — 0x6e99…8251
LiquidityVery thin liquidity▾Concerning
- ›Total liquidity: $4,466
- ›At least one LP position is locked
- ›Primary venue: PancakeSwap V2
CreatorCreator wallet not identified▾Pending
- ›Creator address unavailable
- ›Source unknown
- ›Deployed 12 days ago
- ›Creator wallet age unknown
- ›Creator wallet activity unknown
- ›Owner unknown
Market Snapshot
Key Findings
🟠 Elevated Risk- ✓On-Chain Contract Checks
- ✓Market data (DexScreener)
- ✓Holder distribution
- ○Creator intelligence · Creator attribution unavailable
- ✓LP ownership
- ✓Token identity
- ✓Liquidity depth
- ✓Honeypot screening
Confidence reflects verified evidence coverage and evidence quality — not how safe the token is. Evidence Coverage counts resolved checklist items; it is not a second safety verdict.
100.0% of LP tokens are verified locked or burned, so the pool cannot be pulled by the holder.
Source: On-chain LP holders
Connected Wallet Intelligence
Reading cached wallet relationships…
