Fresh scan in progress — verifying on-chain evidence. Showing the previous report.
Checks Incomplete
A Healthy rating could not be verified: native honeypot simulation cannot evaluate the selected concentrated-liquidity pool; holder concentration is unavailable. This is not evidence the token is unsafe — the required checks did not resolve.
“I can't tell you much from what's on-chain right now.”
The main evidence in this report
No protective claim without on-chain proof
Risk findings remain visible even when other modules lack evidence. Open the full report for wallet, contract, creator and liquidity sources.
GMGN intelligence
Independent token signals. The Rug.Tools verdict stays based on its own analysis.
GMGN counted 69 sniper wallets among the wallets it classified. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
139 wallets tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.
60 known-influencer/KOL wallets currently hold this token according to GMGN. This is market intelligence, not a safety credit.
View 3 more GMGN signals
Fresh Wallets: 1000 · 1000 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
Bot Wallets: 515 · 515 wallets are tagged by GMGN as automated/bot wallets. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
Bundler Trading Activity: 32.0% · GMGN independently estimates 32.0% of trading volume is bot-bundled activity. Corroborating signal only — Rug.Tools' native bundle/launch detection remains primary.
GMGN supplemental: 32.0% bundler trading activity observed independently by GMGN (material corroborating activity). This does not replace or merge with Rug.Tools' native bundle detection above.
Wallet Trade Context
Trade context is unavailable for this sample. Your token report remains available.
Pending ActivityEXPERIMENTAL
Sampled mempool observations, not continuous monitoring. Transactions may fail, be replaced, be cancelled or never confirm. Simulation does not prove confirmation or a completed trade. Pending evidence never changes the main verdict.
Reading stored pending observations…
Detailed reportFull Token AnalysisWallet links, holder distribution, liquidity protection, creator activity, contract controls and source evidence.Open report ↓Close report ↑
Risk Snapshot
The most important report signals in one place. Detailed evidence stays below; this presentation does not recompute or alter the canonical Rug.Tools verdict.
Liquidity depth looks reasonable. Currently sits at $795.9K in liquidity, $1.54M traded in the last 24h. The creator wallet could not be verified, the token is approximately 17 days old.
Why this verdict?▾
- + ConcernBundler Trading Activity: 32.0%GMGN independently estimates 32.0% of trading volume is bot-bundled activity. Corroborating signal only — Rug.Tools' native bundle/launch detection remains primary.
- No dataLargest Individual WalletIndividual holder data unavailable.
- No dataTop 10 WalletsTop 10 wallet concentration unavailable.
- NeutralSniper Wallets: 69GMGN counted 69 sniper wallets among the wallets it classified. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralSmart-Money Wallets: 139139 wallets tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.
- NeutralKOL / Renowned Wallets: 6060 known-influencer/KOL wallets currently hold this token according to GMGN. This is market intelligence, not a safety credit.
- NeutralFresh Wallets: 10001000 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralBot Wallets: 515515 wallets are tagged by GMGN as automated/bot wallets. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralLiquidityLiquidity depth looks reasonable ($795,950).
- NeutralProject LifecycleProject is actively trading on-chain.
- NeutralContract SecurityNo critical contract flags detected.
Key Findings
⚪ Checks IncompleteLive Market Context
Price, liquidity, volume, venue and trading-tax context are grouped here instead of being repeated across the report.
Market Snapshot
Market activity
Recent trades and participating wallets · Birdeye
Loaded only when requested. No background refresh.
Wallet & Distribution Intelligence
Current holder concentration, connected-wallet evidence and launch-window coordination are kept together so current ownership is not confused with historical launch exposure.
Not Identified. LPs, lockers, bridges, exchanges and known contracts are excluded from individual concentration.
Connected Wallet Intelligence
Reading cached wallet relationships…
No Coordinated Launch Signal Observed
Module severity describes launch-pattern evidence and does not replace the overall Rug.Tools verdict.
Reconstructed from ERC-20 Transfer logs in the first 5,000 blocks after deployment. Initial distribution includes pools, lockers and other protocol contracts and is not evidence of insider control. Wallet exposure counts only non-contract recipients, and wallets are reported as coordinated only when they acquired supply in the same block.
GMGN supplemental: 32.0% bundler trading activity observed independently by GMGN (material corroborating activity). This does not replace or merge with Rug.Tools' native bundle detection above.
Developer / Creator Intelligence
Creator attribution, current holdings, external creator facts and wallet-link evidence are correlated here without changing the canonical Rug.Tools verdict.
Developer network could not be fully verified
Wallet-link evidence is incomplete. Missing evidence is not treated as safe.
Incomplete wallet evidence does not lower the overall risk verdict.
Why RugGraph reached this conclusion▾
No relationship evidence was strong enough to list.
Coverage note: connected-wallet relationships are still loading.
Wallet relationships are one risk category. The overall Rug.Tools verdict can still be High Risk because of contract controls, trading restrictions, liquidity, holder concentration, or other evidence. A dominant holder is a concentration risk; one large wallet alone is not proof that several wallets are connected.
Presentation-only · does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict
Liquidity & LP Protection
Trading depth and LP ownership/lock evidence are grouped together. Liquidity depth describes trading conditions; LP protection describes whether liquidity ownership can be verified.
Concentrated-liquidity position ownership and lock protection have not been verified. No protective claim is made without position evidence.
Contract Controls
Direct contract and security-provider evidence. Unknown capabilities stay unknown and are never silently treated as safe.
Historical Pattern Review
Optional read-only comparison against archived launches and developer patterns. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Challenge this report with historical patterns
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Analysis Coverage
Core report evidence and extended intelligence are separated so a complete core report cannot be confused with an unavailable optional launch-history module.
Core evidence coverage measures whether required report checks resolved. It is not a safety score.