High Risk
A single individual wallet controls 43.0% of supply.
“I'm not touching this. The contract or wallets are set up badly.”
- •Single wallet controls 43.0% of supply.
- •Top 10 wallets hold 66.0% — high concentration.
Challenge this report with historical patterns
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Not flagged as a honeypot, however single wallet holds 43.0% of supply. Currently sits at $2.73M in liquidity, $143.7K traded in the last 24h, 23.3K holders. The largest wallet controls 43.0% of supply. The creator wallet could not be verified.
Why this verdict?▾
- + High riskLargest Individual WalletSingle wallet controls 43.0% of supply.
- + ConcernTop 10 WalletsTop 10 wallets hold 66.0% — high concentration.
- NeutralBundler Trading Activity: 1.1%GMGN independently estimates 1.1% of trading volume is bot-bundled activity. Corroborating signal only — Rug.Tools' native bundle/launch detection remains primary.
- NeutralSniper Wallets: 1GMGN counted 1 sniper wallet among the wallets it classified. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralSmart-Money Wallets: 111111 wallets tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.
- NeutralKOL / Renowned Wallets: 3939 known-influencer/KOL wallets currently hold this token according to GMGN. This is market intelligence, not a safety credit.
- NeutralFresh Wallets: 782782 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralBot Wallets: 8383 wallets are tagged by GMGN as automated/bot wallets. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralLiquidityLiquidity depth looks reasonable ($2,729,394).
- NeutralProject LifecycleProject is actively trading on-chain.
- NeutralContract SecurityNo critical contract flags detected.
Sum of the top 10 currently-classified individual wallets. LPs, lockers, bridges, exchanges and known contracts are excluded. Bare wallets that we haven't fingerprinted may still be exchange or team wallets.
Module statuses describe only that evidence area and never override the Overall Verdict.
Contract SecurityNo critical contract flags▾Partial Coverage
- ›Verification status unknown
- ›Tax: 0.0% buy / 0.0% sell
- ›Not a proxy contract (EIP-1967 slot empty)
Holder ConcentrationLargest individual wallet holds 42.95%▾Concerning
- ›Liquidity pool holds 6.70% (excluded from concentration)
- ›42.95% — 0xf977…acec
- ›16.89% — Burn (locked)
- ›11.73% — 0x8894…d4e3
- ›6.70% — DEX Pool
LiquidityLiquidity depth looks reasonable▾Adequate Depth
- ›Total liquidity: $2,729,394
- ›LP data unavailable
- ›Primary venue: PancakeSwap V2
CreatorCreator wallet not identified▾Pending
- ›Creator address unavailable
- ›Source unknown
- ›Deployed 1.6 years ago
- ›Creator wallet age unknown
- ›Creator wallet activity unknown
- ›Owner unknown
Market Snapshot
Key Findings
🔴 High Risk- ✓On-Chain Contract Checks
- ✓Market data (DexScreener)
- ✓Holder distribution
- ○Creator intelligence · Creator attribution unavailable
- ○LP ownership · LP lock status could not be determined from available data
- ✓Token identity
- ✓Liquidity depth
- ✓Honeypot screening
Confidence reflects verified evidence coverage and evidence quality — not how safe the token is. Evidence Coverage counts resolved checklist items; it is not a second safety verdict.
No LP holder or lock data was returned for this token, so liquidity protection is Unknown rather than estimated. Unverified LP is a potential signal only and is not counted as evidence of a rug on its own.
Analysis Unavailable
Bundle analysis unavailable — Launch-window Transfer log coverage is incomplete. Missing evidence is never treated as low risk.
