Fresh scan in progress — verifying on-chain evidence. Showing the previous report.
Elevated Risk
Limited DataMultiple health signals are weakening, and liquidity is relatively low, so expect slippage when trading, and a launch-pattern cluster acquired 16.3% of supply, but independent wallet linkage is not fully corroborated.
“I'm getting nervous. Multiple concerns worth reading before you touch this.”
- •A possible coordinated early-buyer pattern was observed; wallet coordination and insider attribution are not confirmed.
- •Trading activity or liquidity is weakening.
The main evidence in this report
Historical acquisition; current holdings are a separate measure.
No protective claim without on-chain proof
Risk findings remain visible even when other modules lack evidence. Open the full report for wallet, contract, creator and liquidity sources.
GMGN intelligence
Independent token signals. The Rug.Tools verdict stays based on its own analysis.
GMGN counted 6 sniper wallets among the wallets it classified. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
13 wallets tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.
3 known-influencer/KOL wallets currently hold this token according to GMGN. This is market intelligence, not a safety credit.
View 1 more GMGN signals
Fresh Wallets: 11 · 11 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
Wallet Trade Context
Trade context is unavailable for this sample. Your token report remains available.
Pending ActivityEXPERIMENTAL
Sampled mempool observations, not continuous monitoring. Transactions may fail, be replaced, be cancelled or never confirm. Simulation does not prove confirmation or a completed trade. Pending evidence never changes the main verdict.
Reading stored pending observations…
Detailed reportFull Token AnalysisWallet links, holder distribution, liquidity protection, creator activity, contract controls and source evidence.Open report ↓Close report ↑
Risk Snapshot
The most important report signals in one place. Detailed evidence stays below; this presentation does not recompute or alter the canonical Rug.Tools verdict.
Top wallet holdings look distributed (top-10 coverage), however trading risk: low liquidity — expect meaningful slippage. Currently sits at $10.7K in liquidity, $30 traded in the last 24h, 30 holders. Supply is spread across many wallets (top holder 1.9%). The creator wallet could not be verified, the token is approximately 7 days old.
Why this verdict?▾
- + ConcernCoordinated Wallet ActivityA possible coordinated early-buyer pattern was observed; wallet coordination and insider attribution are not confirmed.
- + ConcernProject LifecycleTrading activity or liquidity is weakening.
- + ConcernLiquidityLow liquidity ($10,666) — expect slippage. Trading risk only.
- NeutralLargest Individual WalletLargest wallet holds 1.9% — well distributed.
- NeutralTop 10 WalletsTop 10 wallets hold 10.7% — low concentration.
- NeutralSniper Wallets: 6GMGN counted 6 sniper wallets among the wallets it classified. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralSmart-Money Wallets: 1313 wallets tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.
- NeutralKOL / Renowned Wallets: 33 known-influencer/KOL wallets currently hold this token according to GMGN. This is market intelligence, not a safety credit.
- NeutralFresh Wallets: 1111 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralContract SecurityNo critical contract flags detected.
Key Findings
🟠 Elevated RiskLive Market Context
Price, liquidity, volume, venue and trading-tax context are grouped here instead of being repeated across the report.
Market Snapshot
Market activity
Recent trades and participating wallets · Birdeye
Loaded only when requested. No background refresh.
Wallet & Distribution Intelligence
Current holder concentration, connected-wallet evidence and launch-window coordination are kept together so current ownership is not confused with historical launch exposure.
Low Concentration. LPs, lockers, bridges, exchanges and known contracts are excluded from individual concentration.
Connected Wallet Intelligence
Reading cached wallet relationships…
High Launch-Concentration Signal
Module severity describes launch-pattern evidence and does not replace the overall Rug.Tools verdict.
Reconstructed from ERC-20 Transfer logs in the first 5,000 blocks after deployment. Initial distribution includes pools, lockers and other protocol contracts and is not evidence of insider control. Wallet exposure counts only non-contract recipients, and wallets are reported as coordinated only when they acquired supply in the same block.
Developer / Creator Intelligence
Creator attribution, current holdings, external creator facts and wallet-link evidence are correlated here without changing the canonical Rug.Tools verdict.
Possible connected-wallet cluster
21 wallets show relationship signals. Maximum observed launch exposure was 16.32%. Combined current holdings are unknown. This is a relationship signal, not proof that one developer controls every wallet.
Why RugGraph reached this conclusion▾
- • 21 wallets acquired in 5 same-block clusters
0x0cea…767b23 · attribution limitedCoverage note: connected-wallet relationships are still loading.
Presentation-only · does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict
Liquidity & LP Protection
Trading depth and LP ownership/lock evidence are grouped together. Liquidity depth describes trading conditions; LP protection describes whether liquidity ownership can be verified.
Concentrated-liquidity position ownership and lock protection have not been verified. No protective claim is made without position evidence.
Contract Controls
Direct contract and security-provider evidence. Unknown capabilities stay unknown and are never silently treated as safe.
Historical Pattern Review
Optional read-only comparison against archived launches and developer patterns. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Challenge this report with historical patterns
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Analysis Coverage
Core report evidence and extended intelligence are separated so a complete core report cannot be confused with an unavailable optional launch-history module.
Core evidence coverage measures whether required report checks resolved. It is not a safety score.