
Elevated Risk
Limited DataMultiple health signals are weakening, and liquidity is very thin, so trades will move the price sharply, and the creator has a concerning launch history, and the contract owner still holds privileged controls.

“Several warning signs stacking up. I'd think twice.”
- •Ownership can be reclaimed after renouncement.
- •Trading risk: very thin liquidity — even small trades will move the price.
Challenge this report with historical patterns
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Developer network could not be fully verified
Wallet-link evidence is incomplete. Missing evidence is not treated as safe.
Incomplete wallet evidence does not lower the overall risk verdict.
Why RugGraph reached this conclusion▾
- • Verified creator wallet currently holds 0.00%
0x2bbf…210a83 · verified attributionCoverage note: connected-wallet relationships are still loading.
Wallet relationships are one risk category. The overall Rug.Tools verdict can still be High Risk because of contract controls, trading restrictions, liquidity, holder concentration, or other evidence. A dominant holder is a concentration risk; one large wallet alone is not proof that several wallets are connected.
Presentation-only · does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict
Creator wallet has minimal remaining supply, however ownership can be reclaimed after renouncement. Currently sits at $3.4K in liquidity, $0 traded in the last 24h, 820 holders. The creator wallet is confirmed and holds less than 1% of supply, the token is approximately 14 days old.
Why this verdict?▾
- + ConcernBundler Trading Activity: 16.7%GMGN independently estimates 16.7% of trading volume is bot-bundled activity. Corroborating signal only — Rug.Tools' native bundle/launch detection remains primary.
- + ConcernProject LifecycleTrading activity or liquidity is weakening.
- + ConcernLiquidityVery thin liquidity ($3,378) — a trading risk (heavy slippage), not proof of a scam.
- + ConcernContract SecurityOwner still holds privileged controls.
- + ConcernCreator HistoryCreator has a concerning launch history.
- No dataLargest Individual WalletIndividual holder data unavailable.
- No dataTop 10 WalletsTop 10 wallet concentration unavailable.
- NeutralSmart-Money Wallets: 0GMGN reported no currently holding wallets tagged as historically profitable smart money.
- NeutralFresh Wallets: 1111 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralBot Wallets: 292292 wallets are tagged by GMGN as automated/bot wallets. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
Sum of the top 10 currently-classified individual wallets. LPs, lockers, bridges, exchanges and known contracts are excluded. Bare wallets that we haven't fingerprinted may still be exchange or team wallets.
Module statuses describe only that evidence area and never override the Overall Verdict.
Contract SecurityDirect on-chain reads complete · third-party security screening unavailable on BNB Chain▾Attention
- ›Ownership can be reclaimed
- ›Third-party security screening unavailable on BNB Chain — honeypot, tax and provider-only privilege checks are not available on this chain
- ›Verification status unknown
- ›Tax unknown
- ›Not a proxy contract (EIP-1967 slot empty)
Holder ConcentrationIndividual holder data unavailable▾Pending
LiquidityVery thin liquidity▾Concerning
- ›Total liquidity: $3,378
- ›LP Ownership Not Identified — no locks detected
- ›Primary venue: FourMeme
CreatorCreator holds less than 1% of supply▾Favorable Creator Signal
- ›Address: 0x2bbf…0a83
- ›Source unknown
- ›Deployed 14 days ago
- ›Creator wallet first active 11 month(s) ago
- ›Creator wallet has sent 3,661 transactions
- ›Ownership can be reclaimed
Market Snapshot
Key Findings
🟠 Elevated Risk- ✓On-Chain Contract Checks
- ✓Market data (DexScreener)
- ✓Holder distribution
- ✓Creator intelligence
- ○LP ownership · LP lock status could not be determined from available data
- ✓Token identity
- ✓Liquidity depth
Confidence reflects verified evidence coverage and evidence quality — not how safe the token is. Evidence Coverage counts resolved checklist items; it is not a second safety verdict.
No LP holder or lock data was returned for this token, so liquidity protection is Unknown rather than estimated. Unverified LP is a potential signal only and is not counted as evidence of a rug on its own.
Source: On-chain LP holders
Connected Wallet Intelligence
Reading cached wallet relationships…
