RUG.TOOLS
Donald Dump logo
Ethereum · ERC-20
Donald Dump (DDUMP)
0xaa12694ffdb625cce713af0d13790f9d05b6ee82
Ethereum
Rug.Tools VerdictCached · 2 days ago

High Risk

Limited Data

A single individual wallet controls 71.3% of supply.

Confidence:Medium
Ruggy reacting to a high risk verdict
Ruggy says:
“I'm not touching this. The contract or wallets are set up badly.”
Top signals
  • •Single wallet controls 71.3% of supply.
  • •Top 10 wallets hold 92.7% — high concentration.
Optional Forensic Review

Challenge this report with historical patterns

Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.

Quick Facts
Source Verification
Unknown
Tax
0/0%
Honeypot
No
Executive Summary

Not flagged as a honeypot, however single wallet holds 71.3% of supply. Currently sits at 22 holders. The largest wallet controls 71.3% of supply. The creator wallet is identified.

Distribution
Largest LP (of supply)
—
Largest Individual Holder
71.30%
Creator Wallet
On-chain · First mint
0x844ba9e649567f5ecfcabbe7ea739bb8ad9a6d75
Holds 71.30% of supply
Wallet first active 9 month(s) ago
6 transactions sent
Deployment tx: 0xed64…2cbe
Creator / Project Intelligence · GMGN
GMGN-Attributed Prior Tokens Launched: 0GMGN
GMGN-Attributed Community Takeover: Not reportedGMGN
GMGN-Attributed Dev-Team Holdings: 0.0%GMGN
Why this verdict?
▾
  • Largest Individual Wallet
    Single wallet controls 71.3% of supply.
    + High risk
  • Top 10 Wallets
    Top 10 wallets hold 92.7% — high concentration.
    + Concern
  • Creator History
    Creator has a concerning launch history.
    + Concern
  • Sniper Wallets: 1
    GMGN counted 1 sniper wallet among the wallets it classified. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
    Neutral
  • Smart-Money Wallets: 0
    GMGN reported no currently holding wallets tagged as historically profitable smart money.
    Neutral
  • Liquidity
    Liquidity data unavailable.
    No data
  • Project Lifecycle
    Not enough data to judge lifecycle.
    No data
  • Contract Security
    No critical contract flags detected.
    Neutral
Rule-based breakdown. Missing data is shown as No data and is not treated as a negative signal. Context-only conditions never cancel an independent risk concern.
Top 10 Wallets
92.7%High Concentration

Sum of the top 10 currently-classified individual wallets. LPs, lockers, bridges, exchanges and known contracts are excluded. Bare wallets that we haven't fingerprinted may still be exchange or team wallets.

Intelligence Modules

Module statuses describe only that evidence area and never override the Overall Verdict.

Contract Security
No critical contract flags
▾
Partial Coverage
  • ›Verification status unknown
  • ›Tax: 0.0% buy / 0.0% sell
  • ›Not a proxy contract (EIP-1967 slot empty)
Holder Concentration
Largest individual wallet holds 71.30%
▾
Concerning
  • ›No LP holder identified
  • ›71.30% — 0x844b…6d75
  • ›4.64% — 0x13e0…f266
  • ›2.88% — 0x9b91…2503
  • ›2.57% — 0x851b…ca17
Liquidity
No active trading pair found for this token
▾
Pending
  • ›Liquidity unknown
  • ›LP data unavailable
  • ›Primary venue unknown
Creator
Creator still holds 71.3%
▾
Concerning
  • ›Address: 0x844b…6d75
  • ›Source unknown
  • ›Deployed 9 month(s) ago
  • ›Creator wallet first active 9 month(s) ago
  • ›Creator wallet has sent 6 transactions
  • ›Owner unknown

Market Snapshot

Price
—
24h Change
—
Market Cap
—
Primary Pool 24h Volume
—
Liquidity
—
DEX
—

Key Findings

🔴 High Risk
Report Confidence
🟡Medium
Evidence Coverage
5/7 verified
  • ✓On-Chain Contract Checks
  • ○Market data (DexScreener) · No active market pair verified
  • ✓Holder distribution
  • ✓Creator intelligence
  • ✓Token identity
  • ○Liquidity depth · Liquidity depth could not be verified
  • ✓Honeypot screening

Confidence reflects verified evidence coverage and evidence quality — not how safe the token is. Evidence Coverage counts resolved checklist items; it is not a second safety verdict.

Contract Security · Detail
HoneypotNo
Verified SourceUnknown
MintableNo
PausableNo
Modifiable TaxUnknown
Reclaim OwnershipNo
BlacklistNo
SelfdestructNo
ProxyNo
Holder analysis is based on the largest holders we could reconstruct on-chain — smaller or dormant holders may not be included, so this coverage is treated as partial evidence.
Top Holders (top-10 coverage)
#1👤 Creator0x844b…6d7571.30%
#2🧑 Wallet0x13e0…f2664.64%
#3🧑 Wallet0x9b91…25032.88%
#4🧑 Wallet0x851b…ca172.57%
#5🧑 Wallet0xc33a…ea5d2.17%
#6🧑 Wallet0x12a5…9eb12.08%
#7🧑 Wallet0xe671…ff5c1.98%
#8🧑 Wallet0xc78b…e0b91.94%
#9🧑 Wallet0x8ff8…b2481.62%
#10🧑 Wallet0x54f4…94e71.54%
Legend:👤 Creator🔥 Burn💧 LP🏦 Exchange📄 Contract🧑 Wallet
LP Ownership
LP data unavailable — no liquidity-provider holders were returned for this token.
Liquidity Protection
Risk: Unverified
LP Status
Not verified
LP Owner
Not identified
% Locked
Not verified
Unlock Date
Not verified

No LP holder or lock data was returned for this token, so liquidity protection is Unknown rather than estimated. Unverified LP is a potential signal only and is not counted as evidence of a rug on its own.

Launch & Coordinated Accumulation

Analysis Unavailable

Unavailable

Bundle analysis unavailable — Launch-window Transfer log coverage is incomplete. Missing evidence is never treated as low risk.

Ruggy reacting to unavailable launch data
Analysis Coverage · Confidence Medium
Contract SecurityComplete
Market DataUnavailable
Holder AnalysisTop-10 Coverage
Creator AnalysisConfirmed
Holder analysis is limited to the top 10 wallets returned by the security provider.
🔍 View on Etherscan📈 DexScreener