RUG.TOOLS
Exchange
Zama logo
Ethereum · ERC-20
Zama (ZAMA)
0xa12cc123ba206d4031d1c7f6223d1c2ec249f4f3
Ethereum

Fresh scan in progress — verifying on-chain evidence. Showing the previous report.

Rug.Tools VerdictCached · 7 days ago

High Risk

Checks Incomplete

A single individual wallet controls 67.8% of supply.

Confidence:Medium
Discuss in Discord ↗
Ruggy reacting to a high risk verdict
Ruggy says:
“Everything in me says stay away. This one looks like a trap in the making.”
Top signals
  • •Single wallet controls 67.8% of supply.
  • •Top 10 wallets hold 69.5% — high concentration.
Scan at a glance

The main evidence in this report

Report confidence: MediumCoverage: 6/7 modules
Price
$0.0826
24h price change: -9.5%
Market cap
$934.38M
Liquidity
$673.0K
24h volume
$705.9K
Holders
5,770
Token age
244d
Contract Security
Direct on-chain reads complete · third-party security screening unavailable on Ethereum
Holder Concentration
Largest individual wallet holds 67.76%

Top 10 individual wallets: 69.5% · top-10 coverage

Creator
Creator wallet not identified
LP protection
Not verified

No protective claim without on-chain proof

Risk findings remain visible even when other modules lack evidence. Open the full report for wallet, contract, creator and liquidity sources.

Supplemental source · GMGN

GMGN intelligence

Independent token signals. The Rug.Tools verdict stays based on its own analysis.

Signals available
Sniper Wallets: 54

GMGN counted 54 sniper wallets among the wallets it classified. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.

Smart-Money Wallets: 29

29 wallets tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.

KOL / Renowned Wallets: 13

13 known-influencer/KOL wallets currently hold this token according to GMGN. This is market intelligence, not a safety credit.

View 1 more GMGN signals

Fresh Wallets: 384 · 384 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.

GMGN-Attributed Prior Tokens Launched
0
GMGN-Attributed Community Takeover
Detected
GMGN-Attributed Creator Holdings
0.0%
GMGN-Attributed Dev-Team Holdings
0.0%
Twitter/X Rename History
Renamed 2 times

Wallet Trade Context

Trade context is unavailable for this sample. Your token report remains available.

Pending ActivityEXPERIMENTAL

Sampled mempool observations, not continuous monitoring. Transactions may fail, be replaced, be cancelled or never confirm. Simulation does not prove confirmation or a completed trade. Pending evidence never changes the main verdict.

Reading stored pending observations…

Detailed reportFull Token AnalysisWallet links, holder distribution, liquidity protection, creator activity, contract controls and source evidence.Open report ↓
Report overview

Risk Snapshot

The most important report signals in one place. Detailed evidence stays below; this presentation does not recompute or alter the canonical Rug.Tools verdict.

Executive Summary

Liquidity depth looks reasonable, however owner can pause all transfers. Current authority could not be resolved. Currently sits at $673.0K in liquidity, $705.9K traded in the last 24h, 5.8K holders. The largest wallet controls 67.8% of supply. The creator wallet could not be verified.

Contract Controls
Direct on-chain reads complete · third-party security screening unavailable on Ethereum
Honeypot screening unresolved
Holder Distribution
Largest wallet 67.76%
Top 10 individual wallets: 69.5%
Liquidity
$673.0K
LP protection not fully verified
Creator / Deployer
Not identified
Current holding unavailable
Launch Coordination
No coordinated launch cluster detected
2 transfers replayed
Why this verdict?
▾
  • Largest Individual Wallet
    Single wallet controls 67.8% of supply.
    + High risk
  • Top 10 Wallets
    Top 10 wallets hold 69.5% — high concentration.
    + Concern
  • Contract Security
    Owner can pause transfers, mint new supply.
    + Concern
  • Sniper Wallets: 54
    GMGN counted 54 sniper wallets among the wallets it classified. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
    Neutral
  • Smart-Money Wallets: 29
    29 wallets tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.
    Neutral
  • KOL / Renowned Wallets: 13
    13 known-influencer/KOL wallets currently hold this token according to GMGN. This is market intelligence, not a safety credit.
    Neutral
  • Fresh Wallets: 384
    384 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
    Neutral
  • Liquidity
    Liquidity depth looks reasonable ($673,045).
    Neutral
  • Project Lifecycle
    Project is actively trading on-chain.
    Neutral
Rule-based breakdown. Missing data is shown as No data and is not treated as a negative signal. Context-only conditions never cancel an independent risk concern.

Key Findings

🔴 High Risk
Market & trading

Live Market Context

Price, liquidity, volume, venue and trading-tax context are grouped here instead of being repeated across the report.

Quick Facts
Source Verification
Unknown
Trading Liquidity
$673,045

Market Snapshot

Price
$0.0826
24h Change
-9.5%
Market Cap
$934.38M
Primary Pool 24h Volume
$705.9K
Liquidity
$673.0K
0.07% of market cap · thin relative depth
DEX
Uniswap V3

Market activity

Recent trades and participating wallets · Birdeye

Loaded only when requested. No background refresh.

Wallet intelligence

Wallet & Distribution Intelligence

Current holder concentration, connected-wallet evidence and launch-window coordination are kept together so current ownership is not confused with historical launch exposure.

Largest individual
67.76%
Top 10 individuals
69.5%
Holder coverage
Top-10 coverage

High Concentration. LPs, lockers, bridges, exchanges and known contracts are excluded from individual concentration.

Top Holders (top-10 coverage)
#1🧑 Wallet0x6aed…2b2867.76%
#2📄 ContractERC1967Proxy · 0xe9b1…f4ab13.03%
#3📄 ContractERC1967Proxy · 0x7147…6ae87.02%
#4📄 ContractZamaOFTAdapter · 0xa798…a2682.33%
#5📄 ContractSafeProxy · 0xfc8f…cfa21.77%
#6📄 ContractERC1967Proxy · 0x80cb…80711.08%
#7🏦 ExchangeBinance: Hot Wallet · 0x28c6…1d600.79%
#8🏦 ExchangeExchange · 0x91d4…debe0.34%
#9🧑 Wallet0xdc2f…a98d0.31%
#10🧑 Wallet0x746b…366c0.26%
Legend:👤 Creator🔥 Burn💧 LP🏦 Exchange📄 Contract🧑 Wallet

Connected Wallet Intelligence

Reading cached wallet relationships…

Launch & Coordinated Accumulation

No Coordinated Launch Signal Observed

Module severity describes launch-pattern evidence and does not replace the overall Rug.Tools verdict.

No launch signal
Initial distribution
85.57%
Wallet exposure
85.57%
Coordinated exposure
None detected
Early recipients
1
Coordinated wallets
0
Same-block clusters
0
Creation block
#23790400
Transfers replayed
2
Top Exposed Wallets
0x6aed4db2305b22cff494a15433975b7cc2732b2885.57%

Reconstructed from ERC-20 Transfer logs in the first 5,000 blocks after deployment. Initial distribution includes pools, lockers and other protocol contracts and is not evidence of insider control. Wallet exposure counts only non-contract recipients, and wallets are reported as coordinated only when they acquired supply in the same block.

Ruggy reacting to no coordinated launch signal observed
Developer intelligence

Developer / Creator Intelligence

Creator attribution, current holdings, external creator facts and wallet-link evidence are correlated here without changing the canonical Rug.Tools verdict.

On-chain deployer
Unavailable
Creator wallet not identified
Current holding
—
Wallet age
—
Transactions
—
Deployment tx
0x16b1…0ffa
External creator intelligence · GMGN
GMGN-Attributed Prior Tokens Launched0
GMGN-Attributed Community TakeoverDetected
GMGN-Attributed Creator Holdings0.0%
GMGN-Attributed Dev-Team Holdings0.0%
Twitter/X Rename HistoryRenamed 2 times
RugGraph · Developer Network Intelligence

Developer network could not be fully verified

Limited Coverage

Wallet-link evidence is incomplete. Missing evidence is not treated as safe.

Incomplete wallet evidence does not lower the overall risk verdict.

Wallets with signals
Unknown
Historical launch exposure
Unknown
Largest measured group holdings
Unknown
Creator association
Unknown
Why RugGraph reached this conclusion▾

No relationship evidence was strong enough to list.

Coverage note: connected-wallet relationships are still loading.

Wallet relationships are one risk category. The overall Rug.Tools verdict can still be High Risk because of contract controls, trading restrictions, liquidity, holder concentration, or other evidence. A dominant holder is a concentration risk; one large wallet alone is not proof that several wallets are connected.

Presentation-only · does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict

Liquidity

Liquidity & LP Protection

Trading depth and LP ownership/lock evidence are grouped together. Liquidity depth describes trading conditions; LP protection describes whether liquidity ownership can be verified.

LP Ownership
V3 pools use NFT liquidity positions rather than fungible LP tokens. Position ownership and lock protection have not been verified.
Primary pool: 0x4d68B530920D26c3b01C99fecC19e21011B72bBD
Liquidity Protection
Risk: Unverified
LP Status
Not verified
LP Owner
Not identified
% Locked
Not verified
Unlock Date
Not verified

Concentrated-liquidity position ownership and lock protection have not been verified. No protective claim is made without position evidence.

Contract

Contract Controls

Direct contract and security-provider evidence. Unknown capabilities stay unknown and are never silently treated as safe.

Contract Security · Detail
HoneypotUnknown
Verified SourceUnknown
MintableYes
PausableYes
Modifiable TaxUnknown
Reclaim OwnershipNo
BlacklistNo
SelfdestructNo
ProxyNo
Some contract-security capabilities could not be verified. Unknown contract fields remain unknown; holder coverage is reported separately.
Historical intelligence

Historical Pattern Review

Optional read-only comparison against archived launches and developer patterns. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.

Optional Forensic Review

Challenge this report with historical patterns

Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.

Evidence quality

Analysis Coverage

Core report evidence and extended intelligence are separated so a complete core report cannot be confused with an unavailable optional launch-history module.

Core report evidence
6/7 resolved
Confidence Medium
On-Chain Contract ChecksResolved
Market data (DexScreener)Resolved
Holder distributionResolved
Creator intelligenceUnavailable
LP ownershipResolved
Token identityResolved
Liquidity depthResolved

Core evidence coverage measures whether required report checks resolved. It is not a safety score.

Extended intelligence
Holder depthTop-10 coverage
Launch historyVerified
🔍 View on Etherscan📈 DexScreener