High Risk
Checks IncompleteThe contract exposes a self-destruct function.

“Everything in me says stay away. This one looks like a trap in the making.”
- •Ownership can be reclaimed after renouncement.
- •Contract can self-destruct.
Challenge this report with historical patterns
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Top wallet holdings look distributed (top-10 coverage), however contract can self-destruct. Currently sits at $757.0K in liquidity, $345.6K traded in the last 24h, 3.4K holders. Supply is spread across many wallets (top holder 3.9%). The creator wallet is confirmed.
Why this verdict?▾
- + High riskContract SecurityContract exposes a self-destruct function.
- + ConcernTop 10 WalletsTop 10 wallets hold 20.5% — medium concentration.
- + ConcernCreator HistoryCreator has a concerning launch history.
- NeutralLargest Individual WalletLargest wallet holds 3.9% — well distributed.
- NeutralSmart-Money Wallets: 1818 wallets tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.
- NeutralKOL / Renowned Wallets: 5959 known-influencer/KOL wallets currently hold this token according to GMGN. This is market intelligence, not a safety credit.
- NeutralFresh Wallets: 851851 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralBot Wallets: 11 wallet are tagged by GMGN as automated/bot wallets. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralLiquidityLiquidity depth looks reasonable ($756,987).
- NeutralProject LifecycleProject is actively trading on-chain.
Sum of the top 10 currently-classified individual wallets. LPs, lockers, bridges, exchanges and known contracts are excluded. Bare wallets that we haven't fingerprinted may still be exchange or team wallets.
Module statuses describe only that evidence area and never override the Overall Verdict.
Contract SecurityDirect on-chain reads complete · third-party security screening unavailable on Ethereum▾Concerning
- ›Ownership can be reclaimed
- ›Contract can self-destruct
- ›Third-party security screening unavailable on Ethereum — honeypot, tax and provider-only privilege checks are not available on this chain
- ›Verification status unknown
- ›Tax unknown
- ›Not a proxy contract (EIP-1967 slot empty)
Holder ConcentrationLargest individual wallet holds 3.90%▾Low Concentration
- ›No LP holder identified
- ›4.34% — 0x0000…8a90
- ›3.90% — 0x0198…e8cb
- ›2.75% — 0xe01a…acd9
- ›2.64% — 0xf3f1…272c
LiquidityLiquidity depth looks reasonable▾Adequate Depth
- ›Total liquidity: $756,987
- ›LP data unavailable
- ›Primary venue: Uniswap V2
CreatorCreator holds 3.90% of supply▾Favorable Creator Signal
- ›Address: 0x0198…e8cb
- ›Source unknown
- ›Deployed 2 month(s) ago
- ›Creator wallet first active 1.3 years ago
- ›Creator wallet has sent 855 transactions
- ›Ownership can be reclaimed
Market Snapshot
Key Findings
🔴 High Risk- ✓On-Chain Contract Checks
- ✓Market data (DexScreener)
- ✓Holder distribution
- ✓Creator intelligence
- ○LP ownership · LP lock status could not be determined from available data
- ✓Token identity
- ✓Liquidity depth
Confidence reflects verified evidence coverage and evidence quality — not how safe the token is. Evidence Coverage counts resolved checklist items; it is not a second safety verdict.
No LP holder or lock data was returned for this token, so liquidity protection is Unknown rather than estimated. Unverified LP is a potential signal only and is not counted as evidence of a rug on its own.
Connected Wallet Intelligence
Reading cached wallet relationships…
