High Risk
Coordinated early buying combined with heavy wallet concentration.
“Everything in me says stay away. This one looks like a trap in the making.”
- •Single wallet holds 31.4% of supply.
- •Token is less than a day old — early analysis, treat with caution.
Challenge this report with historical patterns
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Liquidity depth looks reasonable, however single wallet holds 31.4% of supply. Currently sits at $99.0K in liquidity, $165.1K traded in the last 24h, 495 holders. The largest wallet controls 31.4% of supply. The creator wallet is confirmed and holds less than 1% of supply, the token is 1 day old.
Why this verdict?▾
- + ConcernLargest Individual WalletOne wallet holds 31.4% of supply.
- + ConcernTop 10 WalletsTop 10 wallets hold 37.4% — high concentration.
- + ConcernInsider ActivityPossible coordinated early-buyer cluster detected.
- + ConcernRat-Trader Activity: 31.4%GMGN estimates 31.4% of trading volume comes from suspected insider/sneak traders.
- + ConcernBundler Trading Activity: 25.4%GMGN independently estimates 25.4% of trading volume is bot-bundled activity. Corroborating signal only — Rug.Tools' native bundle/launch detection remains primary.
- NeutralSmart-Money Wallets: 11 wallet tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.
- NeutralFresh Wallets: 1010 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralBot Wallets: 1212 wallets are tagged by GMGN as automated/bot wallets. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralLiquidityLiquidity depth looks reasonable ($99,036).
- NeutralProject LifecycleProject is actively trading on-chain.
- NeutralContract SecurityNo critical contract flags detected.
Sum of the top 10 currently-classified individual wallets. LPs, lockers, bridges, exchanges and known contracts are excluded. Bare wallets that we haven't fingerprinted may still be exchange or team wallets.
Module statuses describe only that evidence area and never override the Overall Verdict.
On-Chain Contract ChecksDirect on-chain reads complete · third-party security screening unavailable on Robinhood▾Partial Coverage
- ›Third-party security screening unavailable on Robinhood — honeypot, tax and provider-only privilege checks are not available on this chain
- ›Source verification not available from the current Blockscout evidence
- ›Tax screening not available on Robinhood
- ›Not a proxy contract (EIP-1967 slot empty)
Holder ConcentrationLargest individual wallet holds 31.42%▾Concerning
- ›Liquidity pool holds 2.87% (excluded from concentration)
- ›31.42% — 0x0ec0…2ca3
- ›2.87% — DEX Pool
- ›0.79% — 0x2ac2…f26f
- ›0.78% — 0xba47…63dc
LiquidityLiquidity depth looks reasonable▾Adequate Depth
- ›Total liquidity: $99,036
- ›LP data unavailable
- ›Primary venue: Uniswap V2
CreatorCreator holds less than 1% of supply▾Favorable Creator Signal
- ›Address: 0x0ec0…2ca3
- ›Source unknown
- ›Deployed 1 day ago
- ›Creator wallet age unknown
- ›Creator wallet has sent 3 transactions
- ›Owner unknown
Market Snapshot
Key Findings
🔴 High Risk- ✓On-Chain Contract Checks
- ✓Market data (DexScreener)
- ✓Holder distribution
- ✓Creator intelligence
- ○LP ownership · LP lock status could not be determined from available data
- ✓Token identity
- ✓Liquidity depth
Confidence reflects verified evidence coverage and evidence quality — not how safe the token is. Evidence Coverage counts resolved checklist items; it is not a second safety verdict.
LP lock detection is not available on Robinhood yet. Liquidity protection is shown as Not verified and never estimated; missing data is not treated as a risk signal.
Severe Risk Detected
Reconstructed from ERC-20 Transfer logs in the first 5,000 blocks after deployment. Initial distribution includes pools, lockers and other protocol contracts and is not evidence of insider control. Wallet exposure counts only non-contract recipients, and wallets are reported as coordinated only when they acquired supply in the same block.
GMGN supplemental: 25.4% bundler trading activity observed independently by GMGN (material corroborating activity). This does not replace or merge with Rug.Tools' native bundle detection above.
Connected Wallet Intelligence
Reading cached wallet relationships…