Elevated Risk
The token is actively trading, but one wallet controls 36.6% of supply, and the top 10 wallets control 55.0% of supply.

“I'm getting nervous. Multiple concerns worth reading before you touch this.”
- •Single wallet holds 36.6% of supply.
Challenge this report with historical patterns
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Not flagged as a honeypot, however single wallet holds 36.6% of supply. Currently sits at $6.55M in liquidity, $2.54M traded in the last 24h, 71.2K holders. The largest wallet controls 36.6% of supply. The creator wallet is confirmed and holds less than 1% of supply.
Why this verdict?▾
- + ConcernLargest Individual WalletOne wallet holds 36.6% of supply.
- + ConcernTop 10 WalletsTop 10 wallets hold 55.0% — high concentration.
- NeutralBundler Trading Activity: 0.3%GMGN independently estimates 0.3% of trading volume is bot-bundled activity. Corroborating signal only — Rug.Tools' native bundle/launch detection remains primary.
- NeutralSniper Wallets: 16GMGN counted 16 sniper wallets among the wallets it classified. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralSmart-Money Wallets: 9090 wallets tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.
- NeutralKOL / Renowned Wallets: 114114 known-influencer/KOL wallets currently hold this token according to GMGN. This is market intelligence, not a safety credit.
- NeutralFresh Wallets: 10001000 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralBot Wallets: 55 wallets are tagged by GMGN as automated/bot wallets. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralLiquidityLiquidity depth looks reasonable ($6,550,701).
- NeutralProject LifecycleProject is actively trading on-chain.
- NeutralContract SecurityNo critical contract flags detected.
Sum of the top 10 currently-classified individual wallets. LPs, lockers, bridges, exchanges and known contracts are excluded. Bare wallets that we haven't fingerprinted may still be exchange or team wallets.
Module statuses describe only that evidence area and never override the Overall Verdict.
Contract SecurityNo critical contract flags▾Partial Coverage
- ›Verification status unknown
- ›Tax: 0.0% buy / 0.0% sell
- ›Not a proxy contract (EIP-1967 slot empty)
Holder ConcentrationLargest individual wallet holds 36.56%▾Concerning
- ›Liquidity pool holds 6.34% (excluded from concentration)
- ›36.56% — 0xc882…f071
- ›6.34% — DEX Pool
- ›5.96% — 0xadff…116d
- ›4.30% — 0x1ab4…8f23
LiquidityLiquidity depth looks reasonable▾Adequate Depth
- ›Total liquidity: $6,550,701
- ›At least one LP position is locked
- ›Primary venue: PancakeSwap V2
CreatorCreator holds less than 1% of supply▾Favorable Creator Signal
- ›Address: 0xb779…22ea
- ›Source unknown
- ›Deployed 1.4 years ago
- ›Creator wallet age unknown
- ›Creator wallet has sent 7 transactions
- ›Owner unknown
Market Snapshot
Key Findings
🟠 Elevated Risk- ✓On-Chain Contract Checks
- ✓Market data (DexScreener)
- ✓Holder distribution
- ✓Creator intelligence
- ✓LP ownership
- ✓Token identity
- ✓Liquidity depth
- ✓Honeypot screening
Confidence reflects verified evidence coverage and evidence quality — not how safe the token is. Evidence Coverage counts resolved checklist items; it is not a second safety verdict.
99.9% of LP tokens are verified locked or burned, so the pool cannot be pulled by the holder.
Source: On-chain LP holders
Analysis Unavailable
Bundle analysis unavailable — Launch-window Transfer log coverage is incomplete. Missing evidence is never treated as low risk.

