RUG.TOOLSAwoo (Awoo)
0x91dd2788e3fbed8d7c027145c38fba86e49381dcScan results are a snapshot. Select Analyze Again to run a new scan.
Elevated Risk
Multiple health signals are weakening, and sampled holder accounts hold 15.1% of supply, and liquidity is relatively low, so expect slippage when trading.
Scanned at 2026-10-29 13:58:10 UTC
Market conditions can change after a scan. Select Analyze Again to refresh.
Token controls unverified · Holder evidence incomplete · Evidence needs refreshing.
Verification gaps (7): Required verification checks are incomplete; category availability does not establish completed verification. · The report evidence is stale or its observation time is invalid; confidence is limited. · On-Chain Contract Checks: Required native contract evidence could not be fully verified · More in Evidence & Caveats below.
Evidence-backed reasons, ranked by recorded severity. Open Evidence & Caveats below for complete explanations and limits.
- Risk Indicator
1. Project Lifecycle
Trading activity or liquidity is weakening.
Why it matters: Weakening activity or liquidity can impair exits; deterioration alone is not proof of deliberate fraud.
- Risk Indicator
2. Liquidity
Low liquidity ($24,832) — expect slippage.
Why it matters: Limited available liquidity can make large trades expensive or difficult to exit; a market quote is not proof of LP protection.
Bottom line
Multiple health signals are weakening, and sampled holder accounts hold 15.1% of supply, and liquidity is relatively low, so expect slippage when trading.
Biggest concerns
project lifecycle · liquidity
Evidence & Caveats 2 recorded reasons · 7 verification gapsClick to expandExpanded
Recorded verdict explanation
Multiple health signals are weakening, and sampled holder accounts hold 15.1% of supply, and liquidity is relatively low, so expect slippage when trading.
Some checks unverified: Token controls unverified · Holder evidence incomplete · Evidence needs refreshing.
1. Project Lifecycle · Medium
Trading activity or liquidity is weakening.
Why it matters: Weakening activity or liquidity can impair exits; deterioration alone is not proof of deliberate fraud.
2. Liquidity · Medium
Low liquidity ($24,832) — expect slippage. Trading risk only.
Why it matters: Limited available liquidity can make large trades expensive or difficult to exit; a market quote is not proof of LP protection.
Evidence quality & missing verification
Data available: 7/8 modules. Data availability does not mean every required check was verified.
Confidence describes evidence quality, coverage and freshness.
- Required verification checks are incomplete; category availability does not establish completed verification.
- The report evidence is stale or its observation time is invalid; confidence is limited.
- On-Chain Contract Checks: Required native contract evidence could not be fully verified
- critical contract-security fields are unknown
- top-holder account identity is unverified
- the underlying evidence is stale and has not been re-verified
- Contract Security: Required contract checks are incomplete; absence of critical flags is not established.
Ruggy commentary
“I'm getting nervous. Multiple concerns worth reading before you touch this.”
Follow Rug.Tools & discuss this report
Discuss in Discord ↗Market snapshot & additional signals
Market snapshot & key evidence
Total tracked liquidity
$24,832.40
Combined across tracked pools. Individual pools can have much less liquidity; the total is not an executable exit quote.
Market snapshot · · Snapshot values are not live quotes.
Compare tracked pools (2)
- vvsfinance · Primary0x0fabB…7621e ↗$11,013.12
- vvsfinance0xE6C84…4d653 ↗$13,819.28
Important signals
Recorded facts · open cards for evidenceSampled holder accounts: 15.1% · lower bound after infrastructure exclusions
Pool / position identity is not recorded in this summary.
Evidence details
Applies to the measured pool / position only; other liquidity positions require separate evidence. This does not establish overall safety.
Risk findings remain visible even when other modules lack evidence. Open the full report for wallet, contract, creator and liquidity sources.
Detailed reportFull analysis & source evidenceWallet links, holder distribution, liquidity protection, creator activity, contract controls and source evidence.Expand full analysis ↓Collapse full analysis ↑
Supplemental intelligence
Provider and wallet context
GMGN intelligence
Independent token signals. The Rug.Tools verdict stays based on its own analysis.
Native launch analysis reconstructs a sampled launch-window wallet cohort as a percentage of token supply. GMGN bundler activity estimates a share of trading volume using its own wallet tags; its observation window and population are not established as equivalent. No native pattern in a sample does not rule out GMGN activity. Neither signal alone proves shared funding, bundle execution or insider ownership.
GMGN has not returned data for this token. Your scan and verdict remain available.
Risk Snapshot
Report overviewRisk Snapshot
The most important report signals in one place. Detailed evidence stays below; this presentation does not recompute or alter the canonical Rug.Tools verdict.
Buy/sell simulation passed at block 102760408, however high trading tax (10.0% buy / 10.0% sell). Currently sits at $24.8K in liquidity, $624 traded in the last 24h, 847 holders. The largest sampled holder account holds 3.0%; independent control is unverified. The identified creator wallet holds less than 1% of supply, but total team or connected-wallet ownership is not established.
Why this verdict?▾
- + ConcernProject LifecycleTrading activity or liquidity is weakening.
- + ConcernLiquidityLow liquidity ($24,832) — expect slippage. Trading risk only.
- No dataContract SecurityRequired contract checks are incomplete; absence of critical flags is not established.
- NeutralLargest Holder AccountLargest sampled holder account holds 3.01%; independent control is unverified.
- NeutralSampled Holder Accounts10 sampled accounts hold 15.12% in total; this is a lower bound when the filtered sample has fewer than ten accounts.
Key Findings
🟠 Elevated RiskHigh trading tax (10.0% buy / 10.0% sell).
Meaningful slippage on every trade. If the tax is modifiable, the team can raise it further.
Trading risk: low liquidity — expect meaningful slippage.
A trading-condition warning only. It does not indicate a scam or a rug.
Identified creator wallet currently holds 0% of supply.
This measures only the identified creator wallet; total team or connected-wallet ownership is not established by this metric.
Buy/sell simulation passed at block 102760408.
One simulated trade passed on the tested route and trade size. This does not verify liquidity protection, insider ownership or future selling conditions.
Show all 5 findings
Some LP tokens are held at a burn sink.
Only the measured burned share has positive protection evidence; other balances remain unverified.
Live Market Context
Market & trading
Live Market Context
Price, liquidity, volume, venue and trading-tax context are grouped here instead of being repeated across the report.
Market Snapshot
Holders & connected wallets
Wallet intelligenceWallet & Distribution Intelligence
Current holder concentration, connected-wallet evidence and launch-window coordination are kept together so current ownership is not confused with historical launch exposure.
Medium Concentration. Adjusted concentration excludes identified pools and burn sinks; other custody is retained when independent control is unverified.
Protocol custody is excluded from wallet concentration. It does not verify ownership or locks for individual liquidity positions.
Connected Wallet Intelligence
Reading cached wallet relationships…
Native evidence explorer
Launch, wallet flows & liquidity custody
Inspect what was observed, which balances were measured, and what remains unverified. Timing and transfers alone do not establish common ownership or a sale.
Investigate creator trades & token transfers
Forensic intelligence / Activity
What did the developer actually do?
Separate current holdings, historical launch exposure, verified sales and token transfers. Follow the receipts before drawing conclusions.
- Creator holdings
- 0.00%
- Historical launch exposure
- Unknown
Saved balance measurement; separate from sale history
Observed launch-group share of total token supply; not every graph node, developer sales or present insider ownership
Developer sales: Insufficient Evidence · Trading integrity: Not Scored. A creator holding 0% does not establish whether tokens were sold or transferred.
Launch evidence
0 stored cohort rows
Receipt-level replay was not stored for this snapshot.
Current cohort balances
Unknown
Recipient cohort not recorded
Custody coverage
2 custody accounts / markets
1 without verified protection
Token custody and LP withdrawal protection are separate checks.
Creator provenance
0xcc30…280f · 0.00% current measured holdings
Attribution: rpc-creation-trace. Identified wallet only; this does not establish total team ownership.
Deployment receipt: 0xe371…849f
Launch timeline & receipt references
This older snapshot contains a recipient cohort, not the full receipt timeline. Counts and timing describe only the stored sample. Exact interval supply figures and transaction references remain unknown until a bounded native replay records them.
Pool-by-pool custody & protection
12.28% of token supply in custody · native custody evidence
An infrastructure classification does not establish ownership or withdrawal protection for an individual liquidity position.
9.59% of token supply in custody · native custody evidence
Canonical protection evidence applies to this measured pair only; it does not establish protection for other pools.
Measured wallet balances & transfer evidence
A measured zero balance does not prove a sale. Unknown balances are not zero. Only 0 stored sample rows are listed; aggregate coverage includes missing rows.
| Recipient | Current balance | First position | Receipt references |
|---|
Source snapshot: . This evidence explorer does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict. Existing risk findings, verification gates and source timestamps remain authoritative.
RugGraph / Wallet intelligenceLinked-wallet graph13 wallets · 1 transaction references. Follow the receipts from saved launch evidence.Open wallet graph ↓
01 / Launch activity
Select a wallet to see its activity near token launch. Early receipt of tokens alone does not prove a sniper purchase.
Cyan: tokens received · Amber: tokens moved out · Dashed: deployment. Lines connect wallets to the launch sample; they do not identify who sent the tokens. The first 12 wallets are plotted; every listed wallet can be inspected below.
0xcc300cb3e4cac801348291f8bf75a5011f2a280f
Creator attribution
Balance at last observation
Unknown
Time unavailable · observation, not a live balance
Creator balance history
2025-10-10 14:24:03 UTC · deployment block
Exact on-chain amounts
1000000000000000000000000000 / 1000000000000000000000000000 raw units
Checkpoints show historical balances. A reduction does not establish a sale. Launching multiple tokens does not establish malicious intent.
02 / Funding connections
Where did the funding come from?
Follow verified transfers back up to three wallets. Select any connected wallet to explore its evidence.
Enhanced funding history is unavailable on this chain or snapshot. The saved report remains available above.
Evidence first. Ownership stays unproven.
A transfer proves funds moved between addresses. It does not prove they belong to the same person. Known exchange, bridge and pool accounts are marked as infrastructure.
How to read this evidence
Arrows show receipt references associated with the launch sample. They do not identify transfer counterparties or establish common ownership.
An early recipient is not necessarily a buyer or sniper. Outflows may be transfers; these summaries do not establish realized sales.
Balance measurements retain their original timestamps. Historical launch exposure is separate from present holdings.
Funding paths, verified swap activity and volume manipulation require additional transaction evidence. Missing history is unknown.
Source snapshot: 2026-10-29 13:58:10 UTC · Funding research runs only when requested.
Launch activity
Launch exposure, linked wallets and current holdingsNo Coordinated Launch Signal Observed
Module severity describes launch-pattern evidence and does not replace the overall Rug.Tools verdict.
Reconstructed from ERC-20 Transfer logs in the first 5,000 blocks after deployment. Initial distribution includes pools, lockers and other protocol contracts and is not evidence of insider control. Wallet exposure counts only non-contract recipients, and wallets are reported as coordinated only when they acquired supply in the same block.
Creator intelligence
Developer intelligenceDeveloper / Creator Intelligence
Creator attribution, current holdings, external creator facts and wallet-link evidence are correlated here without changing the canonical Rug.Tools verdict.
May refer to a different wallet or observation time. Reported exits do not establish verified sales or override measured on-chain holdings.
GMGN supplemental intelligence unavailable for this token right now
Historical creator balance: 100.00% of the supply at that time
At the end of the deployment block · 2025-10-10 14:24:03 UTC · block 35662057
A historical balance alone does not establish a sale, current ownership or a scam.
Developer network could not be fully verified
Wallet-link evidence is incomplete. Missing evidence is not treated as safe.
Incomplete wallet evidence does not lower the overall risk verdict.
Inspect wallet links & supporting evidence▾
- • Verified creator wallet currently holds 0.00%
0xcc30…2a280f · verified attributionCoverage note: connected-wallet relationships are still loading.
Wallet relationships are one risk category. The overall Rug.Tools verdict can still be High Risk because of contract controls, trading restrictions, liquidity, holder concentration, or other evidence. A dominant holder is a concentration risk; one large wallet alone is not proof that several wallets are connected.
Presentation-only · does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict
Liquidity & LP Protection
LiquidityLiquidity & LP Protection
Trading depth and LP ownership/lock evidence are grouped together. Liquidity depth describes trading conditions; LP protection describes whether liquidity ownership can be verified.
97.4% of measured LP is burned.
Ownership, protection & source evidence
97.4% of LP tokens are verified burned. This applies only to the measured pool or position and protects it against holder withdrawal; it does not prevent price losses or every liquidity risk.
Protection applies only to the measured pool or position; it does not establish overall token safety.
Source: On-chain LP holders
Contract & trading controls
ContractContract Controls
Direct contract and security-provider evidence. Unknown capabilities stay unknown and are never silently treated as safe.
Sources & coverage
Evidence quality
Analysis Coverage
Core report evidence and extended intelligence are separated so a complete core report cannot be confused with an unavailable optional launch-history module.
Usable evidence can be partial. These counts do not mean every contract permission, sell restriction or liquidity position was verified.