Elevated Risk
Limited DataThe token is actively trading, but one wallet holds 16.7% of supply, and the top 10 wallets control 68.1% of supply, and the creator has a concerning launch history, and the contract owner still holds privileged controls.

“The risk factors are piling on. Not a comfortable one.”
- •High trading tax (5.0% buy / 5.0% sell).
- •Ownership can be reclaimed after renouncement.
Challenge this report with historical patterns
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Not flagged as a honeypot, however high trading tax (5.0% buy / 5.0% sell). Currently sits at $243.7K in liquidity, $45.0K traded in the last 24h, 4.7K holders. Top holder sits at 16.7%. The creator wallet is confirmed and holds less than 1% of supply, the token is approximately 26 days old.
Why this verdict?▾
- + ConcernTop 10 WalletsTop 10 wallets hold 68.1% — high concentration.
- + ConcernRat-Trader Activity: 36.8%GMGN estimates 36.8% of trading volume comes from suspected insider/sneak traders.
- + ConcernLargest Individual WalletLargest wallet holds 16.7%.
- + ConcernContract SecurityOwner still holds privileged controls.
- + ConcernCreator HistoryCreator has a concerning launch history.
- NeutralBundler Trading Activity: 1.4%GMGN independently estimates 1.4% of trading volume is bot-bundled activity. Corroborating signal only — Rug.Tools' native bundle/launch detection remains primary.
- NeutralSmart-Money Wallets: 99 wallets tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.
- NeutralKOL / Renowned Wallets: 66 known-influencer/KOL wallets currently hold this token according to GMGN. This is market intelligence, not a safety credit.
- NeutralFresh Wallets: 10001000 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralBot Wallets: 128128 wallets are tagged by GMGN as automated/bot wallets. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralLiquidityLiquidity depth looks reasonable ($243,666).
- NeutralProject LifecycleProject is actively trading on-chain.
Sum of the top 10 currently-classified individual wallets. LPs, lockers, bridges, exchanges and known contracts are excluded. Bare wallets that we haven't fingerprinted may still be exchange or team wallets.
Module statuses describe only that evidence area and never override the Overall Verdict.
Contract SecurityOwnership can be reclaimed▾Attention
- ›Ownership can be reclaimed
- ›Verification status unknown
- ›Tax: 5.0% buy / 5.0% sell
- ›Not a proxy contract (EIP-1967 slot empty)
Holder ConcentrationLargest individual wallet holds 16.72%▾Attention
- ›Liquidity pool holds 4.92% (excluded from concentration)
- ›16.72% — 0x2a9c…c3d8
- ›13.72% — 0x9e04…6953
- ›12.52% — Burn (locked)
- ›12.39% — 0x038c…32ce
LiquidityLiquidity depth looks reasonable▾Adequate Depth
- ›Total liquidity: $243,666
- ›At least one LP position is locked
- ›Primary venue: PancakeSwap V2
CreatorCreator holds less than 1% of supply▾Favorable Creator Signal
- ›Address: 0x6ab8…e352
- ›Source unknown
- ›Deployed 26 days ago
- ›Creator wallet first active 2 month(s) ago
- ›Creator wallet has sent 297 transactions
- ›Ownership can be reclaimed
Market Snapshot
Key Findings
🟠 Elevated Risk- ✓On-Chain Contract Checks
- ✓Market data (DexScreener)
- ✓Holder distribution
- ✓Creator intelligence
- ○LP ownership · LP lock status could not be determined from available data
- ✓Token identity
- ✓Liquidity depth
- ✓Honeypot screening
Confidence reflects verified evidence coverage and evidence quality — not how safe the token is. Evidence Coverage counts resolved checklist items; it is not a second safety verdict.
No LP holder or lock data was returned for this token, so liquidity protection is Unknown rather than estimated. Unverified LP is a potential signal only and is not counted as evidence of a rug on its own.
Source: On-chain LP holders
Analysis Unavailable
Bundle analysis unavailable — Launch-window Transfer log coverage is incomplete. Missing evidence is never treated as low risk.

