Elevated Risk
Limited DataMultiple health signals are weakening, and one wallet controls 38.9% of supply, and the top 10 wallets control 87.1% of supply.
“I'm getting nervous. Multiple concerns worth reading before you touch this.”
- •Single wallet holds 38.9% of supply.
Challenge this report with historical patterns
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Liquidity depth looks reasonable, however single wallet holds 38.9% of supply. Currently sits at $120.9K in liquidity, $38 traded in the last 24h, 3.5K holders. The largest wallet controls 38.9% of supply. The creator wallet could not be verified.
Why this verdict?▾
- + ConcernLargest Individual WalletOne wallet holds 38.9% of supply.
- + ConcernTop 10 WalletsTop 10 wallets hold 87.1% — high concentration.
- + ConcernProject LifecycleTrading activity or liquidity is weakening.
- NeutralSniper Wallets: 52GMGN counted 52 sniper wallets among the wallets it classified. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralSmart-Money Wallets: 0GMGN reported no currently holding wallets tagged as historically profitable smart money.
- NeutralFresh Wallets: 3737 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralBot Wallets: 55 wallets are tagged by GMGN as automated/bot wallets. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralLiquidityLiquidity depth looks reasonable ($120,941).
- NeutralContract SecurityNo critical contract flags detected.
Sum of the top 10 currently-classified individual wallets. LPs, lockers, bridges, exchanges and known contracts are excluded. Bare wallets that we haven't fingerprinted may still be exchange or team wallets.
Module statuses describe only that evidence area and never override the Overall Verdict.
Contract SecurityDirect on-chain reads complete · third-party security screening unavailable on BNB Chain▾Partial Coverage
- ›Third-party security screening unavailable on BNB Chain — honeypot, tax and provider-only privilege checks are not available on this chain
- ›Verification status unknown
- ›Tax unknown
- ›Not a proxy contract (EIP-1967 slot empty)
Holder ConcentrationLargest individual wallet holds 38.93%▾Concerning
- ›No LP holder identified
- ›38.93% — 0x8641…9518
- ›36.08% — 0xc2b1…7622
- ›8.52% — 0x46c2…edb4
- ›0.75% — 0x9a8e…affc
LiquidityLiquidity depth looks reasonable▾Adequate Depth
- ›Total liquidity: $120,941
- ›At least one LP position is locked
- ›Primary venue: PancakeSwap V2
CreatorCreator wallet not identified▾Pending
- ›Creator address unavailable
- ›Source unknown
- ›Deployed 5 month(s) ago
- ›Creator wallet age unknown
- ›Creator wallet activity unknown
- ›Owner unknown
Market Snapshot
Key Findings
🟠 Elevated Risk- ✓On-Chain Contract Checks
- ✓Market data (DexScreener)
- ✓Holder distribution
- ○Creator intelligence · Creator attribution unavailable
- ✓LP ownership
- ✓Token identity
- ✓Liquidity depth
Confidence reflects verified evidence coverage and evidence quality — not how safe the token is. Evidence Coverage counts resolved checklist items; it is not a second safety verdict.
100.0% of LP tokens are verified locked or burned, so the pool cannot be pulled by the holder.
Source: On-chain LP holders
Analysis Unavailable
Bundle analysis unavailable — Launch-window Transfer log coverage is incomplete. Missing evidence is never treated as low risk.
