Elevated Risk
Checks IncompleteThe token is actively trading, but one wallet holds 11.5% of supply, and the top 10 wallets control 53.1% of supply.

“The risk factors are piling on. Not a comfortable one.”
- •Largest wallet holds 11.5% of supply.
Challenge this report with historical patterns
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Developer network could not be fully verified
Wallet-link evidence is incomplete. Missing evidence is not treated as safe.
Incomplete wallet evidence does not lower the overall risk verdict.
Why RugGraph reached this conclusion▾
No relationship evidence was strong enough to list.
Coverage note: connected-wallet relationships are still loading.
Wallet relationships are one risk category. The overall Rug.Tools verdict can still be High Risk because of contract controls, trading restrictions, liquidity, holder concentration, or other evidence. A dominant holder is a concentration risk; one large wallet alone is not proof that several wallets are connected.
Presentation-only · does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict
Liquidity depth looks reasonable, however largest wallet holds 11.5% of supply. Currently sits at $50.1K in liquidity, $7.2K traded in the last 24h, 2.5K holders. Top holder sits at 11.5%. The creator wallet could not be verified.
Why this verdict?▾
- + ConcernTop 10 WalletsTop 10 wallets hold 53.1% — high concentration.
- + ConcernLargest Individual WalletLargest wallet holds 11.5%.
- NeutralBundler Trading Activity: 1.1%GMGN independently estimates 1.1% of trading volume is bot-bundled activity. Corroborating signal only — Rug.Tools' native bundle/launch detection remains primary.
- NeutralSniper Wallets: 1GMGN counted 1 sniper wallet among the wallets it classified. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralSmart-Money Wallets: 22 wallets tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.
- NeutralFresh Wallets: 4646 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralBot Wallets: 1111 wallets are tagged by GMGN as automated/bot wallets. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralLiquidityLiquidity depth looks reasonable ($50,058).
- NeutralProject LifecycleProject is actively trading on-chain.
- NeutralContract SecurityNo critical contract flags detected.
Sum of the top 10 currently-classified individual wallets. LPs, lockers, bridges, exchanges and known contracts are excluded. Bare wallets that we haven't fingerprinted may still be exchange or team wallets.
Module statuses describe only that evidence area and never override the Overall Verdict.
Contract SecurityDirect on-chain reads complete · third-party security screening unavailable on BNB Chain▾Partial Coverage
- ›Third-party security screening unavailable on BNB Chain — honeypot, tax and provider-only privilege checks are not available on this chain
- ›Verification status unknown
- ›Tax unknown
- ›Not a proxy contract (EIP-1967 slot empty)
Holder ConcentrationLargest individual wallet holds 11.53%▾Attention
- ›Liquidity pool holds 14.71% (excluded from concentration)
- ›14.71% — Burn (locked)
- ›11.53% — Token Contract
- ›8.62% — 0x1c9d…d90c
- ›6.26% — 0x5937…fead
LiquidityLiquidity depth looks reasonable▾Adequate Depth
- ›Total liquidity: $50,058
- ›At least one LP position is locked
- ›Primary venue: PancakeSwap V2
CreatorCreator wallet not identified▾Pending
- ›Creator address unavailable
- ›Source unknown
- ›Deployed 3 month(s) ago
- ›Creator wallet age unknown
- ›Creator wallet activity unknown
- ›Owner unknown
Market Snapshot
Key Findings
🟠 Elevated Risk- ✓On-Chain Contract Checks
- ✓Market data (DexScreener)
- ✓Holder distribution
- ○Creator intelligence · Creator attribution unavailable
- ✓LP ownership
- ✓Token identity
- ✓Liquidity depth
Confidence reflects verified evidence coverage and evidence quality — not how safe the token is. Evidence Coverage counts resolved checklist items; it is not a second safety verdict.
99.8% of LP tokens are verified locked or burned, so the pool cannot be pulled by the holder.
Source: On-chain LP holders
Connected Wallet Intelligence
Reading cached wallet relationships…
