RUG.TOOLS
Exchange
Lisk logo
Ethereum · ERC-20
Lisk (LSK)
0x6033f7f88332b8db6ad452b7c6d5bb643990ae3f
Ethereum
Rug.Tools VerdictCached · 5 days ago

Elevated Risk

Checks Incomplete

The token is actively trading, but the top 10 wallets hold 21.2% of supply, and the creator has a concerning launch history, and the contract owner still holds privileged controls.

Confidence:Medium
Discuss in Discord ↗
Ruggy reacting to a elevated risk verdict
Ruggy says:
“This one has too many yellow flags for my liking.”
Top signals
  • •An unclassified contract holds 39.42% of supply. Its purpose and control remain unverified.
  • •Top 10 wallets hold 21.2% — medium concentration.
Scan at a glance

The main evidence in this report

Report confidence: MediumCoverage: 7/7 modules
Price
$0.3031
24h price change: -2.1%
Market cap
$90.94M
Liquidity
$547.6K
24h volume
$164.6K
Holders
3,590
Token age
503d
Holder Concentration
Unclassified contract holds 39.42%

Top 10 individual wallets: 21.2% · top-10 coverage

Contract Security
Direct on-chain reads complete · third-party security screening unavailable on Ethereum
Creator
Identified creator wallet holds 0% of supply
LP protection
Not verified

No protective claim without on-chain proof

Risk findings remain visible even when other modules lack evidence. Open the full report for wallet, contract, creator and liquidity sources.

Supplemental source · GMGN

GMGN intelligence

Independent token signals. The Rug.Tools verdict stays based on its own analysis.

Signals available

Last available GMGN snapshot · 2026-10-04 12:45 UTC. Live refresh is delayed.

Sniper Wallets: 2

GMGN counted 2 sniper wallets among the wallets it classified. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.

Smart-Money Wallets: 11

11 wallets tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.

Fresh Wallets: 203

203 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.

GMGN-Attributed Prior Tokens Launched
0
GMGN-Attributed Community Takeover
Not reported
GMGN-Attributed Dev-Team Holdings
0.0%

Wallet Trade Context

Trade context is unavailable for this sample. Your token report remains available.

Pending ActivityEXPERIMENTAL

Sampled mempool observations, not continuous monitoring. Transactions may fail, be replaced, be cancelled or never confirm. Simulation does not prove confirmation or a completed trade. Pending evidence never changes the main verdict.

Reading stored pending observations…

Detailed reportFull Token AnalysisWallet links, holder distribution, liquidity protection, creator activity, contract controls and source evidence.Open report ↓
Report overview

Risk Snapshot

The most important report signals in one place. Detailed evidence stays below; this presentation does not recompute or alter the canonical Rug.Tools verdict.

Executive Summary

An unclassified contract holds 39.42% of supply. Its purpose and control remain unverified. Currently sits at $547.6K in liquidity, $164.6K traded in the last 24h, 3.6K holders. The creator wallet could not be verified.

Contract Controls
Direct on-chain reads complete · third-party security screening unavailable on Ethereum
Honeypot screening unresolved
Holder Distribution
Largest wallet 6.26%
Top 10 individual wallets: 21.2%
Liquidity
$547.6K
LP protection not fully verified
Creator / Deployer
0xbfc0…fb58
Current holding: 0.00%
Launch Coordination
No coordinated launch cluster detected
21 transfers replayed
Why this verdict?
▾
  • Unclassified Contract Concentration
    An unclassified contract holds 39.42% of supply. Its purpose and control remain unverified.
    + Concern
  • Top 10 Wallets
    Top 10 wallets hold 21.2% — medium concentration.
    + Concern
  • Contract Security
    Owner still holds privileged controls.
    + Concern
  • Creator History
    Creator has a concerning launch history.
    + Concern
  • Sniper Wallets: 2
    GMGN counted 2 sniper wallets among the wallets it classified. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
    Neutral
  • Smart-Money Wallets: 11
    11 wallets tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.
    Neutral
  • Fresh Wallets: 203
    203 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
    Neutral
  • Liquidity
    Liquidity depth looks reasonable ($547,637).
    Neutral
  • Project Lifecycle
    Project is actively trading on-chain.
    Neutral
Rule-based breakdown. Missing data is shown as No data and is not treated as a negative signal. Context-only conditions never cancel an independent risk concern.

Key Findings

🟠 Elevated Risk
Market & trading

Live Market Context

Price, liquidity, volume, venue and trading-tax context are grouped here instead of being repeated across the report.

Quick Facts
Source Verification
Unknown
Trading Liquidity
$547,637

Market Snapshot

Price
$0.3031
24h Change
-2.1%
Market Cap
$90.94M
Primary Pool 24h Volume
$164.6K
Liquidity
$547.6K
0.60% of market cap
DEX
Uniswap V4

Market activity

Recent trades and participating wallets · Birdeye

Loaded only when requested. No background refresh.

Wallet intelligence

Wallet & Distribution Intelligence

Current holder concentration, connected-wallet evidence and launch-window coordination are kept together so current ownership is not confused with historical launch exposure.

Largest individual
6.26%
Top 10 individuals
21.2%
Holder coverage
Top-10 coverage

Individual wallets only · major contract holding unresolved. LPs, lockers, bridges, exchanges and known contracts are excluded from individual concentration.

Top Holders (top-10 coverage)
#1📄 ContractL1ChugSplashProxy · 0x2658…5d0839.42%
#2📄 ContractSafeProxy · 0x9a1e…2c5912.42%
#3🧑 Wallet0xbbc1…c3556.26%
#4🏦 ExchangeBinance: Hot Wallet 20 · 0xf977…acec5.55%
#5🧑 Wallet0xe92e…a03f3.44%
#6🧑 Wallet0xa783…a0be3.34%
#7📄 ContractMultiSigWallet · 0x111c…141e3.11%
#8🏦 ExchangeBinance: Hot Wallet · 0x28c6…1d602.66%
#9📄 ContractGnosisSafeProxy · 0xcaac…0c022.24%
#10📄 ContractGnosisSafeProxy · 0x586c…13951.59%
Legend:👤 Creator🔥 Burn💧 LP🏦 Exchange📄 Contract🧑 Wallet

Connected Wallet Intelligence

Reading cached wallet relationships…

Launch & Coordinated Accumulation

No Coordinated Launch Signal Observed

Module severity describes launch-pattern evidence and does not replace the overall Rug.Tools verdict.

No launch signal
Initial distribution
25.90%
Wallet exposure
3.33%
Coordinated exposure
None detected
Early recipients
14 (10 contracts)
Coordinated wallets
0
Same-block clusters
0
Creation block
#19882779
Transfers replayed
21
Top Exposed Wallets
0x58a61b1807a7bda541855daaeaee89b1dda48568· contract6.67%
0x38ea61e8084e27a087cf5cdbc3f22584f18773e6· contract5.00%
0xc79d98697295a321a153b366003308c27db5a9eb3.33%
0x18a0b8c653c291d69f21a6ef9a1000335f71618e· contract2.67%
0x4b00a4659454013388b39df9b23f5dbe65bbc06e· contract2.00%

Reconstructed from ERC-20 Transfer logs in the first 5,000 blocks after deployment. Initial distribution includes pools, lockers and other protocol contracts and is not evidence of insider control. Wallet exposure counts only non-contract recipients, and wallets are reported as coordinated only when they acquired supply in the same block.

Ruggy reacting to no coordinated launch signal observed
Developer intelligence

Developer / Creator Intelligence

Creator attribution, current holdings, external creator facts and wallet-link evidence are correlated here without changing the canonical Rug.Tools verdict.

On-chain deployer
Attribution unverified
0xbfc03d7c2527dd6f45f63f0d71adb36b8549fb58
Current holding
0.00%
Wallet age
—
Transactions
68
Deployment tx
0x516f…cd29
External creator intelligence · GMGN
GMGN-Attributed Prior Tokens Launched0
GMGN-Attributed Community TakeoverNot reported
GMGN-Attributed Dev-Team Holdings0.0%
RugGraph · Developer Network Intelligence

Developer network could not be fully verified

Limited Coverage

Wallet-link evidence is incomplete. Missing evidence is not treated as safe.

Incomplete wallet evidence does not lower the overall risk verdict.

Wallets with signals
Unknown
Historical launch exposure
Unknown
Largest measured group holdings
Unknown
Creator association
Unknown
Why RugGraph reached this conclusion▾

No relationship evidence was strong enough to list.

Creator wallet: 0xbfc0…49fb58 · attribution limited

Coverage note: connected-wallet relationships are still loading.

Wallet relationships are one risk category. The overall Rug.Tools verdict can still be High Risk because of contract controls, trading restrictions, liquidity, holder concentration, or other evidence. A dominant holder is a concentration risk; one large wallet alone is not proof that several wallets are connected.

Presentation-only · does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict

Liquidity

Liquidity & LP Protection

Trading depth and LP ownership/lock evidence are grouped together. Liquidity depth describes trading conditions; LP protection describes whether liquidity ownership can be verified.

LP Ownership
V4 pools use NFT liquidity positions rather than fungible LP tokens. Position ownership and lock protection have not been verified.
Primary pool: 0x6af632b8235f1a9d95a816f7a4090736346b763a8ab4e8327017aaae72d0d1d2
Liquidity Protection
Risk: Unverified
LP Status
Not verified
LP Owner
Not identified
% Locked
Not verified
Unlock Date
Not verified

Concentrated-liquidity position ownership and lock protection have not been verified. No protective claim is made without position evidence.

Contract

Contract Controls

Direct contract and security-provider evidence. Unknown capabilities stay unknown and are never silently treated as safe.

Contract Security · Detail
HoneypotUnknown
Verified SourceUnknown
MintableNo
PausableNo
Modifiable TaxUnknown
Reclaim OwnershipYes
BlacklistNo
SelfdestructNo
ProxyNo
Some contract-security capabilities could not be verified. Unknown contract fields remain unknown; holder coverage is reported separately.
Historical intelligence

Historical Pattern Review

Optional read-only comparison against archived launches and developer patterns. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.

Optional Forensic Review

Challenge this report with historical patterns

Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.

Evidence quality

Analysis Coverage

Core report evidence and extended intelligence are separated so a complete core report cannot be confused with an unavailable optional launch-history module.

Core report evidence
7/7 resolved
Confidence Medium
On-Chain Contract ChecksResolved
Market data (DexScreener)Resolved
Holder distributionResolved
Creator intelligenceResolved
LP ownershipResolved
Token identityResolved
Liquidity depthResolved

Core evidence coverage measures whether required report checks resolved. It is not a safety score.

Extended intelligence
Holder depthTop-10 coverage
Launch historyVerified
🔍 View on Etherscan📈 DexScreener