Rugged / Dead
Limited DataThe project shows no meaningful activity. Effectively inactive on-chain.

“Confirmed dead / rugged. Move on — there are safer plays.”
- •Single wallet holds 34.6% of supply.
- •Trading risk: very thin liquidity — even small trades will move the price.
Challenge this report with historical patterns
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Not flagged as a honeypot, however single wallet holds 34.6% of supply. Currently sits at $545 in liquidity, $376 traded in the last 24h, 102.0K holders. The largest wallet controls 34.6% of supply. The creator wallet could not be verified.
Why this verdict?▾
- Critical overrideProject LifecycleProject appears rugged, dead or abandoned.
- + ConcernLargest Individual WalletOne wallet holds 34.6% of supply.
- + ConcernTop 10 WalletsTop 10 wallets hold 46.4% — high concentration.
- + ConcernLiquidityVery thin liquidity ($545) — a trading risk (heavy slippage), not proof of a scam.
- NeutralSniper Wallets: 1000GMGN counted 1000 sniper wallets among the wallets it classified. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralSmart-Money Wallets: 22 wallets tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.
- NeutralFresh Wallets: 207207 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralBot Wallets: 2626 wallets are tagged by GMGN as automated/bot wallets. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralContract SecurityNo critical contract flags detected.
Sum of the top 10 currently-classified individual wallets. LPs, lockers, bridges, exchanges and known contracts are excluded. Bare wallets that we haven't fingerprinted may still be exchange or team wallets.
Module statuses describe only that evidence area and never override the Overall Verdict.
Contract SecurityNo critical contract flags▾Partial Coverage
- ›Verification status unknown
- ›Tax: 1.1% buy / 1.7% sell
- ›Not a proxy contract (EIP-1967 slot empty)
Holder ConcentrationLargest individual wallet holds 34.57%▾Concerning
- ›No LP holder identified
- ›34.57% — 0x5019…72ab
- ›32.09% — Burn (locked)
- ›6.69% — 0x0d07…92fe
- ›1.29% — 0x3a72…715b
LiquidityVery thin liquidity▾Concerning
- ›Total liquidity: $545
- ›At least one LP position is locked
- ›Primary venue: Tidaldex
CreatorCreator wallet not identified▾Pending
- ›Creator address unavailable
- ›Source unknown
- ›Deployed 3.3 years ago
- ›Creator wallet age unknown
- ›Creator wallet activity unknown
- ›Owner: 0x0000…dead
Market Snapshot
Key Findings
😈 Rugged / Dead- ✓On-Chain Contract Checks
- ✓Market data (DexScreener)
- ✓Holder distribution
- ○Creator intelligence · Creator attribution unavailable
- ○LP ownership · LP lock status could not be determined from available data
- ✓Token identity
- ✓Liquidity depth
- ✓Honeypot screening
Confidence reflects verified evidence coverage and evidence quality — not how safe the token is. Evidence Coverage counts resolved checklist items; it is not a second safety verdict.
No LP holder or lock data was returned for this token, so liquidity protection is Unknown rather than estimated. Unverified LP is a potential signal only and is not counted as evidence of a rug on its own.
Source: On-chain LP holders
Connected Wallet Intelligence
Reading cached wallet relationships…
