
High Risk
Limited DataA single individual wallet controls 86.8% of supply.

“I'm not touching this. The contract or wallets are set up badly.”
- •Single wallet controls 86.8% of supply.
- •Top 10 wallets hold 95.9% — high concentration.
Challenge this report with historical patterns
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Single wallet holds 86.8% of supply. Currently sits at 159 holders. The largest wallet controls 86.8% of supply. The creator wallet could not be verified.
Why this verdict?▾
- + High riskLargest Individual WalletSingle wallet controls 86.8% of supply.
- + ConcernTop 10 WalletsTop 10 wallets hold 95.9% — high concentration.
- + ConcernBundler Trading Activity: 6.0%GMGN independently estimates 6.0% of trading volume is bot-bundled activity. Corroborating signal only — Rug.Tools' native bundle/launch detection remains primary.
- NeutralSniper Wallets: 12GMGN counted 12 sniper wallets among the wallets it classified. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralSmart-Money Wallets: 99 wallets tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.
- NeutralKOL / Renowned Wallets: 22 known-influencer/KOL wallets currently hold this token according to GMGN. This is market intelligence, not a safety credit.
- NeutralFresh Wallets: 137137 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralBot Wallets: 5858 wallets are tagged by GMGN as automated/bot wallets. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- No dataLiquidityLiquidity data unavailable.
- No dataProject LifecycleNot enough data to judge lifecycle.
- NeutralContract SecurityNo critical contract flags detected.
Sum of the top 10 currently-classified individual wallets. LPs, lockers, bridges, exchanges and known contracts are excluded. Bare wallets that we haven't fingerprinted may still be exchange or team wallets.
Module statuses describe only that evidence area and never override the Overall Verdict.
Contract SecurityDirect on-chain reads complete · third-party security screening unavailable on BNB Chain▾Partial Coverage
- ›Third-party security screening unavailable on BNB Chain — honeypot, tax and provider-only privilege checks are not available on this chain
- ›Verification status unknown
- ›Tax unknown
- ›Not a proxy contract (EIP-1967 slot empty)
Holder ConcentrationLargest individual wallet holds 86.83%▾Concerning
- ›No LP holder identified
- ›86.83% — 0x4e8f…dd18
- ›1.62% — 0x6c36…db1d
- ›1.53% — 0xcd0d…288c
- ›1.44% — 0x538a…2d00
LiquidityNo active trading pair found for this token▾Pending
- ›Liquidity unknown
- ›LP data unavailable
- ›Primary venue unknown
CreatorCreator wallet not identified▾Pending
- ›Creator address unavailable
- ›Source unknown
- ›Deployed 1 month(s) ago
- ›Creator wallet age unknown
- ›Creator wallet activity unknown
- ›Owner unknown
Market Snapshot
Key Findings
🔴 High Risk- ✓On-Chain Contract Checks
- ○Market data (DexScreener) · No active market pair verified
- ✓Holder distribution
- ○Creator intelligence · Creator attribution unavailable
- ✓Token identity
- ○Liquidity depth · Liquidity depth could not be verified
Confidence reflects verified evidence coverage and evidence quality — not how safe the token is. Evidence Coverage counts resolved checklist items; it is not a second safety verdict.
No LP holder or lock data was returned for this token, so liquidity protection is Unknown rather than estimated. Unverified LP is a potential signal only and is not counted as evidence of a rug on its own.
Analysis Unavailable
Bundle analysis unavailable — Launch-window Transfer log coverage is incomplete. Missing evidence is never treated as low risk.

