Fresh scan in progress — verifying on-chain evidence. Showing the previous report.
Checks Incomplete
A Healthy rating could not be verified: native honeypot simulation cannot evaluate the selected concentrated-liquidity pool; the underlying evidence is stale and has not been re-verified. This is not evidence the token is unsafe — the required checks did not resolve.
“The blockchain is quiet on this one. Come back later.”
The main evidence in this report
No protective claim without on-chain proof
Top 10 individual wallets: 5.3% · top-10 coverage
Risk findings remain visible even when other modules lack evidence. Open the full report for wallet, contract, creator and liquidity sources.
GMGN intelligence
Independent token signals. The Rug.Tools verdict stays based on its own analysis.
GMGN has not returned data for this token. Your scan and verdict remain available.
Wallet Trade Context
Trade context is unavailable for this sample. Your token report remains available.
Pending ActivityEXPERIMENTAL
Sampled mempool observations, not continuous monitoring. Transactions may fail, be replaced, be cancelled or never confirm. Simulation does not prove confirmation or a completed trade. Pending evidence never changes the main verdict.
Reading stored pending observations…
Detailed reportFull Token AnalysisWallet links, holder distribution, liquidity protection, creator activity, contract controls and source evidence.Open report ↓Close report ↑
Risk Snapshot
The most important report signals in one place. Detailed evidence stays below; this presentation does not recompute or alter the canonical Rug.Tools verdict.
Top wallet holdings look distributed (top-10 coverage). Currently sits at $1.49M in liquidity, $4.43M traded in the last 24h, 2.1K holders. Supply is spread across many wallets (top holder 2.0%). The creator wallet could not be verified, the token is approximately 24 days old.
Why this verdict?▾
- NeutralLargest Individual WalletLargest wallet holds 2.0% — well distributed.
- NeutralTop 10 WalletsTop 10 wallets hold 5.3% — low concentration.
- NeutralLiquidityLiquidity depth looks reasonable ($1,488,218).
- NeutralProject LifecycleProject is actively trading on-chain.
- NeutralContract SecurityNo critical contract flags detected.
Key Findings
⚪ Checks IncompleteLive Market Context
Price, liquidity, volume, venue and trading-tax context are grouped here instead of being repeated across the report.
Market Snapshot
Market activity
Recent trades and participating wallets · Birdeye
Loaded only when requested. No background refresh.
Wallet & Distribution Intelligence
Current holder concentration, connected-wallet evidence and launch-window coordination are kept together so current ownership is not confused with historical launch exposure.
Low Concentration. LPs, lockers, bridges, exchanges and known contracts are excluded from individual concentration.
Connected Wallet Intelligence
Reading cached wallet relationships…
No Coordinated Launch Signal Observed
Module severity describes launch-pattern evidence and does not replace the overall Rug.Tools verdict.
Reconstructed from ERC-20 Transfer logs in the first 5,000 blocks after deployment. Initial distribution includes pools, lockers and other protocol contracts and is not evidence of insider control. Wallet exposure counts only non-contract recipients, and wallets are reported as coordinated only when they acquired supply in the same block.
Developer / Creator Intelligence
Creator attribution, current holdings, external creator facts and wallet-link evidence are correlated here without changing the canonical Rug.Tools verdict.
GMGN supplemental intelligence unavailable for this token right now
Developer network could not be fully verified
Wallet-link evidence is incomplete. Missing evidence is not treated as safe.
Incomplete wallet evidence does not lower the overall risk verdict.
Why RugGraph reached this conclusion▾
No relationship evidence was strong enough to list.
Coverage note: connected-wallet relationships are still loading.
Wallet relationships are one risk category. The overall Rug.Tools verdict can still be High Risk because of contract controls, trading restrictions, liquidity, holder concentration, or other evidence. A dominant holder is a concentration risk; one large wallet alone is not proof that several wallets are connected.
Presentation-only · does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict
Liquidity & LP Protection
Trading depth and LP ownership/lock evidence are grouped together. Liquidity depth describes trading conditions; LP protection describes whether liquidity ownership can be verified.
Concentrated-liquidity position ownership and lock protection have not been verified. No protective claim is made without position evidence.
Contract Controls
Direct contract and security-provider evidence. Unknown capabilities stay unknown and are never silently treated as safe.
Historical Pattern Review
Optional read-only comparison against archived launches and developer patterns. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Challenge this report with historical patterns
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Analysis Coverage
Core report evidence and extended intelligence are separated so a complete core report cannot be confused with an unavailable optional launch-history module.
Core evidence coverage measures whether required report checks resolved. It is not a safety score.