Only 5 of 7 analysis modules could be verified on Base, so Rug.Tools cannot issue a complete safety-clear verdict for this token. Confirmed risk findings below still apply. Missing data is not counted as a new risk signal — and it is not evidence the token is safe either.
Verified below: market data from DexScreener.
Elevated Risk
Checks IncompleteMultiple health signals are weakening, and new tokens can be minted.
“I'm getting nervous. Multiple concerns worth reading before you touch this.”
- •Owner can mint additional supply. Current authority could not be resolved.
Challenge this report with historical patterns
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Top wallet holdings look distributed (top-10 coverage), however owner can mint additional supply. Current authority could not be resolved. Currently sits at $5.65M in liquidity, $368 traded in the last 24h, 1.3K holders. Supply is spread across many wallets (top holder 0.3%). The creator wallet is confirmed and holds less than 1% of supply.
Why this verdict?▾
- + ConcernContract SecurityOwner can mint new supply.
- + ConcernProject LifecycleTrading activity or liquidity is weakening.
- NeutralLargest Individual WalletLargest wallet holds 0.3% — well distributed.
- NeutralTop 10 WalletsTop 10 wallets hold 2.5% — low concentration.
- NeutralSniper Wallets: 1000GMGN counted 1000 sniper wallets among the wallets it classified. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralSmart-Money Wallets: 0GMGN reported no currently holding wallets tagged as historically profitable smart money.
- NeutralFresh Wallets: 44 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralLiquidityLiquidity depth looks reasonable ($5,654,654).
Sum of the top 10 currently-classified individual wallets. LPs, lockers, bridges, exchanges and known contracts are excluded. Bare wallets that we haven't fingerprinted may still be exchange or team wallets.
Module statuses describe only that evidence area and never override the Overall Verdict.
Contract SecurityDirect on-chain reads complete · third-party security screening unavailable on Base▾Attention
- ›Owner can mint additional supply
- ›Third-party security screening unavailable on Base — honeypot, tax and provider-only privilege checks are not available on this chain
- ›Verification status unknown
- ›Tax unknown
- ›Not a proxy contract (EIP-1967 slot empty)
Holder ConcentrationLargest individual wallet holds 0.31%▾Low Concentration
- ›Liquidity pool holds 25.24% (excluded from concentration)
- ›25.24% — PoolManager · contract
- ›0.31% — 0x8b61…76bf
- ›0.30% — 0x8a91…a93e
- ›0.30% — 0xef70…abbd
LiquidityLiquidity depth looks reasonable▾Adequate Depth
- ›Total liquidity: $5,654,654
- ›LP data unavailable
- ›Primary venue: Uniswap V2
CreatorCreator holds less than 1% of supply▾Favorable Creator Signal
- ›Address: 0x2d61…1b36
- ›Source unknown
- ›Deployed 2 month(s) ago
- ›Creator wallet age unknown
- ›Creator wallet has sent 4 transactions
- ›Owner unknown
Market Snapshot
Key Findings
🟠 Elevated Risk- ○On-Chain Contract Checks · One or more required native contract checks failed
- ✓Market data (DexScreener)
- ✓Holder distribution
- ✓Creator intelligence
- ○LP ownership · LP lock status could not be determined from available data
- ✓Token identity
- ✓Liquidity depth
Confidence reflects verified evidence coverage and evidence quality — not how safe the token is. Evidence Coverage counts resolved checklist items; it is not a second safety verdict.
No LP holder or lock data was returned for this token, so liquidity protection is Unknown rather than estimated. Unverified LP is a potential signal only and is not counted as evidence of a rug on its own.
Connected Wallet Intelligence
Reading cached wallet relationships…