RUG.TOOLS
Exchange
Trust Cat logo
BNB Chain · BEP-20
Trust Cat (TRUSTCAT)
0x3a3debaee09d579f87cb8d034eca5ddb90eb7777
BNB Chain
Rug.Tools VerdictCached · 5 days ago

Use Caution

The token is actively trading, but the top 10 wallets hold 16.4% of supply, and liquidity is relatively low, so expect slippage when trading.

Confidence:Medium
Discuss in Discord ↗
Ruggy reacting to a use caution verdict
Ruggy says:
“Mixed signals here — read the factors before you commit.”
Top signals
  • •Top 10 wallets hold 16.4% — medium concentration.
  • •Low liquidity ($20,589) — expect slippage. Trading risk only.
Scan at a glance

The main evidence in this report

Report confidence: MediumCoverage: 7/8 modules
Price
$0.00004183
24h price change: -14.4%
Market cap
$41.8K
Liquidity
$20.6K
24h volume
$144.4K
Holders
255
Token age
5d
Creator
Creator wallet not identified
Contract Security
No critical contract flags
Holder Concentration
Largest individual wallet holds 2.72%

Top 10 individual wallets: 16.4% · top-10 coverage

LP protection
99.8% LP locked/burned

Verified from liquidity ownership evidence

Risk findings remain visible even when other modules lack evidence. Open the full report for wallet, contract, creator and liquidity sources.

Supplemental source · GMGN

GMGN intelligence

Independent token signals. The Rug.Tools verdict stays based on its own analysis.

Unavailable

GMGN has not returned data for this token. Your scan and verdict remain available.

Detailed reportFull Token AnalysisWallet links, holder distribution, liquidity protection, creator activity, contract controls and source evidence.Open report ↓
Report overview

Risk Snapshot

The most important report signals in one place. Detailed evidence stays below; this presentation does not recompute or alter the canonical Rug.Tools verdict.

Executive Summary

Not flagged as a honeypot, however trading risk: low liquidity — expect meaningful slippage. Currently sits at $20.6K in liquidity, $144.4K traded in the last 24h, 255 holders. Supply is spread across many wallets (top holder 2.7%). The creator wallet could not be verified, the token is 5 days old.

Contract Controls
No critical contract flags
Honeypot screening: no
Holder Distribution
Largest wallet 2.72%
Top 10 individual wallets: 16.4%
Liquidity
$20.6K
LP locked/burned: 99.75%
Creator / Deployer
Not identified
Current holding unavailable
Launch Coordination
No coordinated launch cluster detected
4,183 transfers replayed
Why this verdict?
▾
  • Top 10 Wallets
    Top 10 wallets hold 16.4% — medium concentration.
    + Concern
  • Liquidity
    Low liquidity ($20,589) — expect slippage. Trading risk only.
    + Concern
  • Largest Individual Wallet
    Largest wallet holds 2.7% — well distributed.
    Neutral
  • Project Lifecycle
    Project is actively trading on-chain.
    Neutral
  • Contract Security
    No critical contract flags detected.
    Neutral
Rule-based breakdown. Missing data is shown as No data and is not treated as a negative signal. Context-only conditions never cancel an independent risk concern.

Key Findings

🟡 Use Caution
Market & trading

Live Market Context

Price, liquidity, volume, venue and trading-tax context are grouped here instead of being repeated across the report.

Quick Facts
Source Verification
Unknown
Tax
3/3%
Honeypot
No
Trading Liquidity
$20,589

Market Snapshot

Price
$0.00004183
24h Change
-14.4%
Market Cap
$41.8K
Primary Pool 24h Volume
$144.4K
Liquidity
$20.6K
49.28% of market cap
DEX
PancakeSwap V2

Market activity

Recent trades and participating wallets · Birdeye

Loaded only when requested. No background refresh.

Wallet intelligence

Wallet & Distribution Intelligence

Current holder concentration, connected-wallet evidence and launch-window coordination are kept together so current ownership is not confused with historical launch exposure.

Largest individual
2.72%
Top 10 individuals
16.4%
Holder coverage
Top-10 coverage

Medium Concentration. LPs, lockers, bridges, exchanges and known contracts are excluded from individual concentration.

Top Holders (top-10 coverage)
#1💧 LPDEX Pool · 0xce35…b08f24.62%
#2📄 Contract0xa51e…343e10.64%
#3📄 Contract0xf5ef…2aa32.86%
#4🧑 Wallet0x1f52…47462.72%
#5🧑 Wallet0xb458…44282.62%
#6🧑 Wallet0x1a3f…934f2.38%
#7🧑 Wallet0xae06…18bf2.25%
#8🧑 Wallet0xf3a9…965f2.24%
#9🧑 Wallet0xfa70…04122.11%
#10🧑 Wallet0x2b87…e1652.09%
Legend:👤 Creator🔥 Burn💧 LP🏦 Exchange📄 Contract🧑 Wallet

Connected Wallet Intelligence

Reading cached wallet relationships…

Launch & Coordinated Accumulation

No Coordinated Launch Signal Observed

Module severity describes launch-pattern evidence and does not replace the overall Rug.Tools verdict.

No launch signal
Initial distribution
82.85%
Wallet exposure
69.36%
Coordinated exposure
8.01%
Early recipients
323 (2 contracts)
Coordinated wallets
36
Same-block clusters
14
Creation block
#124505975
Transfers replayed
4183
Top Exposed Wallets
0xa51e2082f9411562710b22497b18563e12d4343e· contract10.64%
0xf5ef8888e6c40a27de1dbe9f69d6b1c1c3182aa3· contract2.86%
0xb4586d742306b8179ffc6bbf47dbb67b3af544282.62%
0x1a3f762fd22f2faebf18049d8ac24ea85f40934f2.38%
0xae06844c99e6c76c2dfeaf438305cc9d3d9d18bf2.25%

Reconstructed from ERC-20 Transfer logs in the first 5,000 blocks after deployment. Initial distribution includes pools, lockers and other protocol contracts and is not evidence of insider control. Wallet exposure counts only non-contract recipients, and wallets are reported as coordinated only when they acquired supply in the same block.

Ruggy reacting to no coordinated launch signal observed
Developer intelligence

Developer / Creator Intelligence

Creator attribution, current holdings, external creator facts and wallet-link evidence are correlated here without changing the canonical Rug.Tools verdict.

On-chain deployer
Unavailable
Creator wallet not identified
Current holding
—
Wallet age
—
Transactions
—
Deployment tx
—
External creator intelligence · GMGN

GMGN supplemental intelligence unavailable for this token right now

Important wallet relationship signal
RugGraph · Developer Network Intelligence

Possible connected-wallet cluster

Possible Relationship

36 wallets show relationship signals. Maximum observed launch exposure was 8.01%. Combined current holdings are unknown. This is a relationship signal, not proof that one developer controls every wallet.

Wallets with signals
36
Historical launch exposure
8.01%
Largest measured group holdings
Unknown
Creator association
Unknown
Why RugGraph reached this conclusion▾
  • • 36 wallets acquired in 14 same-block clusters

Coverage note: connected-wallet relationships are still loading.

Presentation-only · does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict

Liquidity

Liquidity & LP Protection

Trading depth and LP ownership/lock evidence are grouped together. Liquidity depth describes trading conditions; LP protection describes whether liquidity ownership can be verified.

LP Ownership
Locked
99.75%
Unlocked
0%
Unknown
0.25%
Source: on-chain LP holders · 2 LP holders · 2 locked positions. Percentages reflect share of LP tokens (not token supply).
Burn 0x0000…0000🔒 Locked0%
Burn 0x0000…dead🔒 Locked99.75%
Lock status is derived from on-chain LP token balances. Unlock date and lock provider are not always resolvable on-chain — verify duration with the lock provider before relying on it.
Liquidity Protection
Risk: Low
LP Status
Locked
LP Owner
🔥 Burn address
% Locked
99.8%
Unlock Date
Not provided

99.8% of LP tokens are verified locked or burned, so the pool cannot be pulled by the holder.

Source: On-chain LP holders

Contract

Contract Controls

Direct contract and security-provider evidence. Unknown capabilities stay unknown and are never silently treated as safe.

Contract Security · Detail
HoneypotNo
Verified SourceUnknown
MintableNo
PausableNo
Modifiable TaxUnknown
Reclaim OwnershipNo
BlacklistNo
SelfdestructNo
ProxyNo
Some contract-security capabilities could not be verified. Unknown contract fields remain unknown; holder coverage is reported separately.
Historical intelligence

Historical Pattern Review

Optional read-only comparison against archived launches and developer patterns. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.

Optional Forensic Review

Challenge this report with historical patterns

Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.

Evidence quality

Analysis Coverage

Core report evidence and extended intelligence are separated so a complete core report cannot be confused with an unavailable optional launch-history module.

Core report evidence
7/8 resolved
Confidence Medium
On-Chain Contract ChecksResolved
Market data (DexScreener)Resolved
Holder distributionResolved
Creator intelligenceUnavailable
LP ownershipResolved
Token identityResolved
Liquidity depthResolved
Honeypot screeningResolved

Core evidence coverage measures whether required report checks resolved. It is not a safety score.

Extended intelligence
Holder depthTop-10 coverage
Launch historyVerified
🔍 View on BscScan📈 DexScreener