Elevated Risk
Limited DataMultiple health signals are weakening, and the top 10 wallets hold 16.8% of supply, and liquidity is relatively low, so expect slippage when trading, and the creator has a concerning launch history, and the contract owner still holds privileged controls.
“The risk factors are piling on. Not a comfortable one.”
- •Ownership can be reclaimed after renouncement.
- •Trading risk: low liquidity — expect meaningful slippage.
Challenge this report with historical patterns
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Top wallet holdings look distributed (top-10 coverage), however ownership can be reclaimed after renouncement. Currently sits at $11.4K in liquidity, $15 traded in the last 24h, 107 holders. Supply is spread across many wallets (top holder 6.6%). The creator wallet could not be verified, the token is approximately 22 days old.
Why this verdict?▾
- + ConcernTop 10 WalletsTop 10 wallets hold 16.8% — medium concentration.
- + ConcernProject LifecycleTrading activity or liquidity is weakening.
- + ConcernLiquidityLow liquidity ($11,373) — expect slippage. Trading risk only.
- + ConcernContract SecurityOwner still holds privileged controls.
- + ConcernCreator HistoryCreator has a concerning launch history.
- NeutralLargest Individual WalletLargest wallet holds 6.6% — well distributed.
- NeutralSmart-Money Wallets: 3232 wallets tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.
- NeutralKOL / Renowned Wallets: 22 known-influencer/KOL wallets currently hold this token according to GMGN. This is market intelligence, not a safety credit.
- NeutralFresh Wallets: 4646 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
Sum of the top 10 currently-classified individual wallets. LPs, lockers, bridges, exchanges and known contracts are excluded. Bare wallets that we haven't fingerprinted may still be exchange or team wallets.
Module statuses describe only that evidence area and never override the Overall Verdict.
Contract SecurityDirect on-chain reads complete · third-party security screening unavailable on Ethereum▾Attention
- ›Ownership can be reclaimed
- ›Third-party security screening unavailable on Ethereum — honeypot, tax and provider-only privilege checks are not available on this chain
- ›Verification status unknown
- ›Tax unknown
- ›Not a proxy contract (EIP-1967 slot empty)
Holder ConcentrationLargest individual wallet holds 6.61%▾Low Concentration
- ›No LP holder identified
- ›65.73% — 0x0000…8a90
- ›6.61% — Token Contract
- ›2.24% — 0xccb0…d913
- ›1.65% — 0x22ff…1837
LiquidityLow liquidity▾Attention
- ›Total liquidity: $11,373
- ›LP data unavailable
- ›Primary venue: Uniswap V2
CreatorCreator wallet not identified▾Pending
- ›Creator address unavailable
- ›Source unknown
- ›Deployed 22 days ago
- ›Creator wallet age unknown
- ›Creator wallet activity unknown
- ›Ownership can be reclaimed
Market Snapshot
Key Findings
🟠 Elevated Risk- ✓On-Chain Contract Checks
- ✓Market data (DexScreener)
- ✓Holder distribution
- ○Creator intelligence · Creator attribution unavailable
- ○LP ownership · LP lock status could not be determined from available data
- ✓Token identity
- ✓Liquidity depth
Confidence reflects verified evidence coverage and evidence quality — not how safe the token is. Evidence Coverage counts resolved checklist items; it is not a second safety verdict.
No LP holder or lock data was returned for this token, so liquidity protection is Unknown rather than estimated. Unverified LP is a potential signal only and is not counted as evidence of a rug on its own.
Analysis Unavailable
Bundle analysis unavailable — Launch-window Transfer log coverage is incomplete. Missing evidence is never treated as low risk.
