RUG.TOOLS
Exchange
Aikol logo
BNB Chain · BEP-20
Aikol (AIKOL)
0x2c4a0ecb25cf51db87418bdcc3abb612707e4444
BNB Chain
Rug.Tools VerdictCached · 16 hours ago

Use Caution

The token is actively trading, but the top 10 wallets hold 20.2% of supply.

Confidence:High
Discuss in Discord ↗
Ruggy reacting to a use caution verdict
Ruggy says:
“Mixed signals here — read the factors before you commit.”
Top signals
  • •Top 10 wallets hold 20.2% — medium concentration.
Scan at a glance

The main evidence in this report

Report confidence: HighCoverage: 8/8 modules
Price
$0.0003116
24h price change: +10402.0%
Market cap
$311.7K
Liquidity
$65.8K
24h volume
$3.51M
Holders
1,594
Token age
341d
Creator
Identified creator wallet holds 0% of supply
Contract Security
No critical contract flags
Holder Concentration
Largest individual wallet holds 2.91%

Top 10 individual wallets: 20.2% · top-10 coverage

LP protection
100.0% LP locked/burned

Verified from liquidity ownership evidence

Risk findings remain visible even when other modules lack evidence. Open the full report for wallet, contract, creator and liquidity sources.

Supplemental source · GMGN

GMGN intelligence

Independent token signals. The Rug.Tools verdict stays based on its own analysis.

Signals available

Last available GMGN snapshot · 2026-10-02 22:40 UTC. Live refresh is delayed.

Sniper Wallets: 1

GMGN counted 1 sniper wallet among the wallets it classified. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.

Smart-Money Wallets: 34

34 wallets tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.

KOL / Renowned Wallets: 11

11 known-influencer/KOL wallets currently hold this token according to GMGN. This is market intelligence, not a safety credit.

View 3 more GMGN signals

Fresh Wallets: 133 · 133 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.

Bot Wallets: 392 · 392 wallets are tagged by GMGN as automated/bot wallets. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.

Bundler Trading Activity: 5.8% · GMGN independently estimates 5.8% of trading volume is bot-bundled activity. Corroborating signal only — Rug.Tools' native bundle/launch detection remains primary.

GMGN-Attributed Prior Tokens Launched
1
GMGN-Attributed Community Takeover
Detected
GMGN-Attributed Dev-Team Holdings
0.0%

GMGN supplemental: 5.8% bundler trading activity observed independently by GMGN (material corroborating activity). This does not replace or merge with Rug.Tools' native bundle detection above.

Detailed reportFull Token AnalysisWallet links, holder distribution, liquidity protection, creator activity, contract controls and source evidence.Open report ↓
Report overview

Risk Snapshot

The most important report signals in one place. Detailed evidence stays below; this presentation does not recompute or alter the canonical Rug.Tools verdict.

Executive Summary

Not flagged as a honeypot. Currently sits at $65.8K in liquidity, $3.51M traded in the last 24h, 1.6K holders. Supply is spread across many wallets (top holder 2.9%). The identified creator wallet holds less than 1% of supply, but total team or connected-wallet ownership is not established.

Contract Controls
No critical contract flags
Honeypot screening: no
Holder Distribution
Largest wallet 2.91%
Top 10 individual wallets: 20.2%
Liquidity
$65.8K
LP locked/burned: 100.00%
Creator / Deployer
0x432a…bd63
Current holding: 0.00%
Launch Coordination
No coordinated launch cluster detected
500 transfers replayed
Why this verdict?
▾
  • Bundler Trading Activity: 5.8%
    GMGN independently estimates 5.8% of trading volume is bot-bundled activity. Corroborating signal only — Rug.Tools' native bundle/launch detection remains primary.
    + Concern
  • Top 10 Wallets
    Top 10 wallets hold 20.2% — medium concentration.
    + Concern
  • Largest Individual Wallet
    Largest wallet holds 2.9% — well distributed.
    Neutral
  • Sniper Wallets: 1
    GMGN counted 1 sniper wallet among the wallets it classified. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
    Neutral
  • Smart-Money Wallets: 34
    34 wallets tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.
    Neutral
  • KOL / Renowned Wallets: 11
    11 known-influencer/KOL wallets currently hold this token according to GMGN. This is market intelligence, not a safety credit.
    Neutral
  • Fresh Wallets: 133
    133 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
    Neutral
  • Bot Wallets: 392
    392 wallets are tagged by GMGN as automated/bot wallets. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
    Neutral
  • Liquidity
    Liquidity depth looks reasonable ($65,779).
    Neutral
  • Project Lifecycle
    Project is actively trading on-chain.
    Neutral
  • Contract Security
    No critical contract flags detected.
    Neutral
Rule-based breakdown. Missing data is shown as No data and is not treated as a negative signal. Context-only conditions never cancel an independent risk concern.

Key Findings

🟡 Use Caution
Market & trading

Live Market Context

Price, liquidity, volume, venue and trading-tax context are grouped here instead of being repeated across the report.

Quick Facts
Source Verification
Unknown
Tax
0/0%
Honeypot
No
Trading Liquidity
$65,779

Market Snapshot

Price
$0.0003116
24h Change
+10402.0%
Market Cap
$311.7K
Primary Pool 24h Volume
$3.51M
Liquidity
$65.8K
21.11% of market cap
DEX
PancakeSwap V2

Market activity

Recent trades and participating wallets · Birdeye

Loaded only when requested. No background refresh.

Wallet intelligence

Wallet & Distribution Intelligence

Current holder concentration, connected-wallet evidence and launch-window coordination are kept together so current ownership is not confused with historical launch exposure.

Largest individual
2.91%
Top 10 individuals
20.2%
Holder coverage
Top-10 coverage

Medium Concentration. LPs, lockers, bridges, exchanges and known contracts are excluded from individual concentration.

Top Holders (top-10 coverage)
#1💧 LPDEX Pool · 0xc742…e83d10.46%
#2🧑 Wallet0x6d8a…dabc2.91%
#3🧑 Wallet0x3f6c…652c2.56%
#4🧑 Wallet0xd874…dab02.40%
#5🧑 Wallet0x5b65…e9422.29%
#6🧑 Wallet0x4b75…bdc22.06%
#7🧑 Wallet0x10fc…7e3a2.06%
#8🧑 Wallet0x9740…fa5d1.99%
#9🧑 Wallet0xbb5d…013f1.99%
#10🧑 Wallet0x759f…b0001.96%
Legend:👤 Creator🔥 Burn💧 LP🏦 Exchange📄 Contract🧑 Wallet

Connected Wallet Intelligence

Reading cached wallet relationships…

Launch & Coordinated Accumulation

No Coordinated Launch Signal Observed

Module severity describes launch-pattern evidence and does not replace the overall Rug.Tools verdict.

No launch signalPreviously verified · 10/2/2026
Initial distribution
7.16%
Wallet exposure
4.73%
Coordinated exposure
0.30%
Early recipients
64 (1 contracts)
Coordinated wallets
6
Same-block clusters
2
Creation block
#66098083
Transfers replayed
500
Top Exposed Wallets
0xc10c3aec4eb75509e099b0163b906a0ca83d8eb3· contract2.43%
0x7f1ec429196b41fea9a8e2076a69617d826352141.78%
0x1839c265206a5d23f85b4f4fb163e3825450e75a1.35%
0xce2e526da782dc57dae3eb7cbec57d1ca9e0c9220.56%
0x9b820123a358c001acf2af65a5d6d597dbf394bf0.29%

Reconstructed from ERC-20 Transfer logs in the first 5,000 blocks after deployment. Initial distribution includes pools, lockers and other protocol contracts and is not evidence of insider control. Wallet exposure counts only non-contract recipients, and wallets are reported as coordinated only when they acquired supply in the same block.

GMGN supplemental: 5.8% bundler trading activity observed independently by GMGN (material corroborating activity). This does not replace or merge with Rug.Tools' native bundle detection above.

Ruggy reacting to no coordinated launch signal observed
Developer intelligence

Developer / Creator Intelligence

Creator attribution, current holdings, external creator facts and wallet-link evidence are correlated here without changing the canonical Rug.Tools verdict.

On-chain deployer
On-chain · Deployer
Current holding
0.00%
Wallet age
—
Transactions
7
Deployment tx
0x0581…b742
External creator intelligence · GMGN
GMGN-Attributed Prior Tokens Launched1
GMGN-Attributed Community TakeoverDetected
GMGN-Attributed Dev-Team Holdings0.0%
Important wallet relationship signal
RugGraph · Developer Network Intelligence

Possible connected-wallet cluster

Possible Relationship

6 wallets show relationship signals. Maximum observed launch exposure was 0.30%. Combined current holdings are unknown. This is a relationship signal, not proof that one developer controls every wallet.

Wallets with signals
6
Historical launch exposure
0.30%
Largest measured group holdings
Unknown
Creator association
Unknown
Why RugGraph reached this conclusion▾
  • • 6 wallets acquired in 2 same-block clusters
  • • Verified creator wallet currently holds 0.00%
Creator wallet: 0x432a…bebd63 · verified attribution

Coverage note: connected-wallet relationships are still loading.

Presentation-only · does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict

Liquidity

Liquidity & LP Protection

Trading depth and LP ownership/lock evidence are grouped together. Liquidity depth describes trading conditions; LP protection describes whether liquidity ownership can be verified.

LP Ownership
Locked
100.00%
Unlocked
0%
Unknown
<0.01%
Source: on-chain LP holders · 2 LP holders · 2 locked positions. Percentages reflect share of LP tokens (not token supply).
Burn 0x0000…0000🔒 Locked0%
Burn 0x0000…dead🔒 Locked100.00%
Lock status is derived from on-chain LP token balances. Unlock date and lock provider are not always resolvable on-chain — verify duration with the lock provider before relying on it.
Liquidity Protection
Risk: Low
LP Status
Locked
LP Owner
🔥 Burn address
% Locked
100.0%
Unlock Date
Not provided

100.0% of LP tokens are verified locked or burned, so the pool cannot be pulled by the holder.

Source: On-chain LP holders

Contract

Contract Controls

Direct contract and security-provider evidence. Unknown capabilities stay unknown and are never silently treated as safe.

Contract Security · Detail
HoneypotNo
Verified SourceUnknown
MintableNo
PausableNo
Modifiable TaxUnknown
Reclaim OwnershipNo
BlacklistNo
SelfdestructNo
ProxyNo
Some contract-security capabilities could not be verified. Unknown contract fields remain unknown; holder coverage is reported separately.
Historical intelligence

Historical Pattern Review

Optional read-only comparison against archived launches and developer patterns. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.

Optional Forensic Review

Challenge this report with historical patterns

Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.

Evidence quality

Analysis Coverage

Core report evidence and extended intelligence are separated so a complete core report cannot be confused with an unavailable optional launch-history module.

Core report evidence
8/8 resolved
Confidence High
On-Chain Contract ChecksResolved
Market data (DexScreener)Resolved
Holder distributionResolved
Creator intelligenceResolved
LP ownershipResolved
Token identityResolved
Liquidity depthResolved
Honeypot screeningResolved

Core evidence coverage measures whether required report checks resolved. It is not a safety score.

Extended intelligence
Holder depthTop-10 coverage
Launch historyVerified