Use Caution
Limited DataThe token is actively trading, but the top 10 wallets hold 32.1% of supply, and liquidity is relatively low, so expect slippage when trading.
“Mixed signals here — read the factors before you commit.”
- •Top 10 wallets hold 32.1% — medium concentration.
- •Low liquidity ($15,037) — expect slippage. Trading risk only.
The main evidence in this report
No protective claim without on-chain proof
Top 10 individual wallets: 32.1% · top-10 coverage
Risk findings remain visible even when other modules lack evidence. Open the full report for wallet, contract, creator and liquidity sources.
GMGN intelligence
Independent token signals. The Rug.Tools verdict stays based on its own analysis.
Last available GMGN snapshot · 2026-10-03 13:10 UTC. Live refresh is delayed.
GMGN reported no currently holding wallets tagged as historically profitable smart money.
2 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
15 wallets are tagged by GMGN as automated/bot wallets. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
Detailed reportFull Token AnalysisWallet links, holder distribution, liquidity protection, creator activity, contract controls and source evidence.Open report ↓Close report ↑
Risk Snapshot
The most important report signals in one place. Detailed evidence stays below; this presentation does not recompute or alter the canonical Rug.Tools verdict.
Top wallet holdings look distributed (top-10 coverage), however trading risk: low liquidity — expect meaningful slippage. Currently sits at $15.0K in liquidity, $15.2K traded in the last 24h, 35 holders. Supply is spread across many wallets (top holder 4.6%). The identified creator wallet holds less than 1% of supply, but total team or connected-wallet ownership is not established, the token is 17 hours old.
Why this verdict?▾
- + ConcernTop 10 WalletsTop 10 wallets hold 32.1% — medium concentration.
- + ConcernLiquidityLow liquidity ($15,037) — expect slippage. Trading risk only.
- NeutralLargest Individual WalletLargest wallet holds 4.6% — well distributed.
- NeutralSmart-Money Wallets: 0GMGN reported no currently holding wallets tagged as historically profitable smart money.
- NeutralFresh Wallets: 22 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralBot Wallets: 1515 wallets are tagged by GMGN as automated/bot wallets. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralProject LifecycleProject is actively trading on-chain.
- NeutralContract SecurityNo critical contract flags detected.
Key Findings
🟡 Use CautionLive Market Context
Price, liquidity, volume, venue and trading-tax context are grouped here instead of being repeated across the report.
Market Snapshot
Market activity
Recent trades and participating wallets · Birdeye
Loaded only when requested. No background refresh.
Wallet & Distribution Intelligence
Current holder concentration, connected-wallet evidence and launch-window coordination are kept together so current ownership is not confused with historical launch exposure.
Medium Concentration. LPs, lockers, bridges, exchanges and known contracts are excluded from individual concentration.
Connected Wallet Intelligence
Reading cached wallet relationships…
No Coordinated Launch Signal Observed
Module severity describes launch-pattern evidence and does not replace the overall Rug.Tools verdict.
Reconstructed from ERC-20 Transfer logs in the first 5,000 blocks after deployment. Initial distribution includes pools, lockers and other protocol contracts and is not evidence of insider control. Wallet exposure counts only non-contract recipients, and wallets are reported as coordinated only when they acquired supply in the same block.
Developer / Creator Intelligence
Creator attribution, current holdings, external creator facts and wallet-link evidence are correlated here without changing the canonical Rug.Tools verdict.
Developer network could not be fully verified
Wallet-link evidence is incomplete. Missing evidence is not treated as safe.
Incomplete wallet evidence does not lower the overall risk verdict.
Why RugGraph reached this conclusion▾
- • Verified creator wallet currently holds 0.00%
0x18f7…26c3af · verified attributionCoverage note: connected-wallet relationships are still loading.
Wallet relationships are one risk category. The overall Rug.Tools verdict can still be High Risk because of contract controls, trading restrictions, liquidity, holder concentration, or other evidence. A dominant holder is a concentration risk; one large wallet alone is not proof that several wallets are connected.
Presentation-only · does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict
Liquidity & LP Protection
Trading depth and LP ownership/lock evidence are grouped together. Liquidity depth describes trading conditions; LP protection describes whether liquidity ownership can be verified.
Concentrated-liquidity position ownership and lock protection have not been verified. No protective claim is made without position evidence.
Contract Controls
Direct contract and security-provider evidence. Unknown capabilities stay unknown and are never silently treated as safe.
Historical Pattern Review
Optional read-only comparison against archived launches and developer patterns. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Challenge this report with historical patterns
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Analysis Coverage
Core report evidence and extended intelligence are separated so a complete core report cannot be confused with an unavailable optional launch-history module.
Core evidence coverage measures whether required report checks resolved. It is not a safety score.