Checks Incomplete
A Healthy rating could not be verified: native honeypot simulation cannot evaluate the selected concentrated-liquidity pool; the underlying evidence is stale and has not been re-verified. This is not evidence the token is unsafe — the required checks did not resolve.
“I can't tell you much from what's on-chain right now.”
Challenge this report with historical patterns
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Top wallet holdings look distributed (top-10 coverage). Currently sits at $270.8K in liquidity, $402.8K traded in the last 24h, 1.5K holders. Supply is spread across many wallets (top holder 2.0%). The creator wallet could not be verified.
Why this verdict?▾
- NeutralLargest Individual WalletLargest wallet holds 2.0% — well distributed.
- NeutralTop 10 WalletsTop 10 wallets hold 7.8% — low concentration.
- NeutralSniper Wallets: 38GMGN counted 38 sniper wallets among the wallets it classified. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralSmart-Money Wallets: 22 wallets tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.
- NeutralKOL / Renowned Wallets: 66 known-influencer/KOL wallets currently hold this token according to GMGN. This is market intelligence, not a safety credit.
- NeutralFresh Wallets: 583583 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralLiquidityLiquidity depth looks reasonable ($270,791).
- NeutralProject LifecycleProject is actively trading on-chain.
- NeutralContract SecurityNo critical contract flags detected.
Sum of the top 10 currently-classified individual wallets. LPs, lockers, bridges, exchanges and known contracts are excluded. Bare wallets that we haven't fingerprinted may still be exchange or team wallets.
Module statuses describe only that evidence area and never override the Overall Verdict.
Contract SecurityDirect on-chain reads complete · third-party security screening unavailable on Base▾Partial Coverage
- ›Third-party security screening unavailable on Base — honeypot, tax and provider-only privilege checks are not available on this chain
- ›Verification status unknown
- ›Tax unknown
- ›Not a proxy contract (EIP-1967 slot empty)
Holder ConcentrationLargest individual wallet holds 2.04%▾Low Concentration
- ›Liquidity pool holds 6.29% (excluded from concentration)
- ›6.29% — PoolManager · contract
- ›5.00% — VestingManager · contract
- ›2.13% — 0x3e03…d0b7 · contract
- ›2.04% — 0x28c6…c245
LiquidityLiquidity depth looks reasonable▾Adequate Depth
- ›Total liquidity: $270,791
- ›LP data unavailable
- ›Primary venue: Uniswap V2
CreatorCreator wallet not identified▾Pending
- ›Creator address unavailable
- ›Source unknown
- ›Deployed 3 month(s) ago
- ›Creator wallet age unknown
- ›Creator wallet activity unknown
- ›Owner unknown
Market Snapshot
Key Findings
⚪ Checks Incomplete- ✓On-Chain Contract Checks
- ✓Market data (DexScreener)
- ✓Holder distribution
- ○Creator intelligence · Creator attribution unavailable
- ○LP ownership · LP lock status could not be determined from available data
- ✓Token identity
- ✓Liquidity depth
Confidence reflects verified evidence coverage and evidence quality — not how safe the token is. Evidence Coverage counts resolved checklist items; it is not a second safety verdict.
No LP holder or lock data was returned for this token, so liquidity protection is Unknown rather than estimated. Unverified LP is a potential signal only and is not counted as evidence of a rug on its own.