RUG.TOOLS
Veltrix exchange (Veltrix)
0x21a8dd1ae3fc614ce5abffad196d1470ed287777Scan results are a snapshot. Select Analyze Again to run a new scan.
High Risk
A single holder account holds 40.3% of supply; independent control is not established.
Evidence-backed reasons, ranked by recorded severity. Open Evidence & Caveats below for complete explanations and limits.
- High-Priority Risk
1. Unclassified Contract Concentration
An unclassified contract holds 40.34% of supply.
- High-Priority Risk
2. Largest Holder Account
One holder account holds 40.3% of supply; independent control is not established.
- Risk Indicator
3. Sampled Holder Accounts
sampled holder accounts hold 61.4% — high concentration.
- Risk Indicator
4. Liquidity
Low liquidity ($19,932) — expect slippage.
Why it matters: Limited available liquidity can make large trades expensive or difficult to exit; a market quote is not proof of LP protection.
Evidence & Caveats 4 recorded reasons · 12 verification gapsClick to expandExpanded
Recorded verdict explanation
A single holder account holds 40.3% of supply; independent control is not established.
Some checks unverified: Sell check unverified · Token controls unverified · Contract Holder Unclassified · LP protection unverified · Evidence needs refreshing.
1. Unclassified Contract Concentration · High
An unclassified contract holds 40.34% of supply. Its purpose and control remain unverified.
2. Largest Holder Account · High
One holder account holds 40.3% of supply; independent control is not established.
3. Sampled Holder Accounts · Medium
sampled holder accounts hold 61.4% — high concentration.
4. Liquidity · Medium
Low liquidity ($19,932) — expect slippage. Trading risk only.
Why it matters: Limited available liquidity can make large trades expensive or difficult to exit; a market quote is not proof of LP protection.
Evidence quality & missing verification
Data available: 5/7 modules. Data availability does not mean every required check was verified.
Confidence describes evidence quality, coverage and freshness.
- Required verification checks are incomplete; category availability does not establish completed verification.
- The report evidence is stale or its observation time is invalid; confidence is limited.
- 4/58 launch-wallet balances measured; 54 remain unknown. Present group holdings are not fully measured.
- On-Chain Contract Checks: Required native contract evidence could not be fully verified
- LP ownership: LP lock status could not be determined from available data
- native honeypot simulation cannot evaluate this market's available route
- critical contract-security fields are unknown
- a major holder is an unresolved contract
- no verified locked or burned LP position was detected
- the underlying evidence is stale and has not been re-verified
- An unclassified contract holds 40.34% of supply. Its purpose and control remain unverified.
- Contract Security: Required contract checks are incomplete; absence of critical flags is not established.
Ruggy commentary
“I'm not touching this. The contract or wallets are set up badly.”
Follow Rug.Tools & discuss this report
Discuss in Discord ↗Coverage note: Liquidity protection is unverified. No verified locked or burned LP position was established.
Market snapshot & additional signals
Market snapshot & key evidence
Total tracked liquidity
$19,932.49
Combined across tracked pools. Individual pools can have much less liquidity; the total is not an executable exit quote.
Market snapshot · · Snapshot values are not live quotes.
Compare tracked pools (1)
- flapsh · Primary0x54eE2…6A321 ↗$19,932.49
Important signals
Recorded facts · open cards for evidenceSampled holder accounts: 61.4% · lower bound after infrastructure exclusions
No protective claim without on-chain proof
Risk findings remain visible even when other modules lack evidence. Open the full report for wallet, contract, creator and liquidity sources.
Detailed reportFull analysis & source evidenceWallet links, holder distribution, liquidity protection, creator activity, contract controls and source evidence.Expand full analysis ↓Collapse full analysis ↑
Supplemental intelligence
Provider and wallet context
GMGN intelligence
Independent token signals. The Rug.Tools verdict stays based on its own analysis.
Native launch analysis reconstructs a sampled launch-window wallet cohort as a percentage of token supply. GMGN bundler activity estimates a share of trading volume using its own wallet tags; its observation window and population are not established as equivalent. No native pattern in a sample does not rule out GMGN activity. Neither signal alone proves shared funding, bundle execution or insider ownership.
GMGN has not returned data for this token. Your scan and verdict remain available.
Wallet Trade Context
Loading trade context separately from your scan…
Pending ActivityEXPERIMENTAL
Sampled mempool observations, not continuous monitoring. Transactions may fail, be replaced, be cancelled or never confirm. Simulation does not prove confirmation or a completed trade. Pending evidence never changes the main verdict.
Reading stored pending observations…
Risk Snapshot
Report overviewRisk Snapshot
The most important report signals in one place. Detailed evidence stays below; this presentation does not recompute or alter the canonical Rug.Tools verdict.
An unclassified contract holds 40.34% of supply. Its purpose and control remain unverified. Currently sits at $19.9K in liquidity, $25.5K traded in the last 24h, 110 holders. The identified creator wallet holds less than 1% of supply, but total team or connected-wallet ownership is not established, the observed pool is 3 days old.
Why this verdict?▾
- + High riskUnclassified Contract ConcentrationAn unclassified contract holds 40.34% of supply. Its purpose and control remain unverified.
- + High riskLargest Holder AccountOne holder account holds 40.3% of supply; independent control is not established.
- + ConcernSampled Holder Accountssampled holder accounts hold 61.4% — high concentration.
- + ConcernLiquidityLow liquidity ($19,932) — expect slippage. Trading risk only.
- No dataContract SecurityRequired contract checks are incomplete; absence of critical flags is not established.
- NeutralProject LifecycleProject is actively trading on-chain.
Key Findings
🔴 High RiskSingle holder holds 40.3% of supply.
One holder controlling a quarter of supply can crash the price on exit.
An unclassified contract holds 40.34% of supply.
This address is a smart contract we could not classify as a liquidity pool, locker, bridge or exchange. This unverified contract custody remains included in concentration risk; independent control is unverified. Verify what the contract does before assuming the supply is safely held.
Proxy/delegated execution detected.
Execution uses another implementation. Proxy detection alone does not establish whether it can be changed or who controls it; implementation privileges remain subject to separate checks.
Trading risk: low liquidity — expect meaningful slippage.
A trading-condition warning only. It does not indicate a scam or a rug.
Show all 6 findings
Identified creator wallet currently holds 0% of supply.
This measures only the identified creator wallet; total team or connected-wallet ownership is not established by this metric.
- About 2 day(s) old.
Live Market Context
Market & trading
Live Market Context
Price, liquidity, volume, venue and trading-tax context are grouped here instead of being repeated across the report.
Market Snapshot
Market activity
Recent trades and participating wallets · Birdeye
Loaded only when requested. No background refresh.
Holders & connected wallets
Wallet intelligenceWallet & Distribution Intelligence
Current holder concentration, connected-wallet evidence and launch-window coordination are kept together so current ownership is not confused with historical launch exposure.
Account control unresolved · major contract holding unresolved. Adjusted concentration excludes identified pools and burn sinks; other custody is retained when independent control is unverified.
Connected Wallet Intelligence
Reading cached wallet relationships…
Native evidence explorer
Launch, wallet flows & liquidity custody
Inspect what was observed, which balances were measured, and what remains unverified. Timing and transfers alone do not establish common ownership or a sale.
Investigate creator trades & token transfers
Forensic intelligence / Activity
What did the developer actually do?
Separate current holdings, historical launch exposure, verified sales and token transfers. Follow the receipts before drawing conclusions.
- Creator holdings
- 0.00%
- Historical launch exposure
- 8.99%
Saved balance measurement; separate from sale history
Observed launch-group share of total token supply; not every graph node, developer sales or present insider ownership
Developer sales: Insufficient Evidence · Trading integrity: Not Scored. A creator holding 0% does not establish whether tokens were sold or transferred.
Launch evidence
89 observed recipients
Interval evidence only; full launch coverage is reported separately.
204 receipts examined
Current cohort balances
At least 7.70%
4/58 wallets measured · 54 unknown
Custody coverage
2 custody accounts / markets
2 without verified protection
Token custody and LP withdrawal protection are separate checks.
Creator provenance
0x7543…2558 · 0.00% current measured holdings
Attribution: rpc-creation-trace. Identified wallet only; this does not establish total team ownership.
Deployment receipt: 0x220f…5c8f
Launch timeline & receipt references
Anchor block #130,115,006 · observed through #130,120,005 · Reconstruction captured:
| From anchor | Recipients | Net inflow / supply | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| +0 blocks | 0 | 0.00% | Stored interval verified |
| +2 blocks | 4 | 1.54% | Stored interval verified |
| +5 blocks | 4 | 1.54% | Stored interval verified |
| +10 blocks | 4 | 1.54% | Stored interval verified |
Intervals include the anchor through the stated offset. Net inflows are token movements recorded in those receipts, divided by supply measured at replay time; they are not confirmed purchases or current holdings. Partial replay may omit inflows or outflows. Historical values are not clamped into ownership claims.
- 0x220f…5c8f · #130,115,006
- 0x3efb…2c25 · #130,115,007
- 0x4eaf…67c2 · #130,115,007
- 0xb91d…3ea8 · #130,115,007
- 0xd1dd…4bb7 · #130,115,007
- 0x8282…ccde · #130,115,029
- 0x81d4…200e · #130,115,030
- 0xf8fc…6f27 · #130,115,031
- 0x19dd…4eee · #130,115,074
- 0xa942…f053 · #130,115,310
- 0x0a12…e27a · #130,115,311
- 0x1ef2…ab17 · #130,115,311
- 0x253d…2f4b · #130,115,311
- 0x403a…9caf · #130,115,311
- 0xa74f…f0ff · #130,115,311
- 0xb3af…f4da · #130,115,311
Pool-by-pool custody & protection
40.34% of token supply in custody · reported role / market
An infrastructure classification does not establish ownership or withdrawal protection for an individual liquidity position.
Pool allocation not established · reported role / market
Market selection alone does not verify LP ownership, locks or the controller of this pool.
Measured wallet balances & transfer evidence
A measured zero balance does not prove a sale. Unknown balances are not zero. Only 40 stored sample rows are listed; aggregate coverage includes missing rows.
| Recipient | Current balance | First position | Receipt references |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0x5609…4754 | 2.03% | #130,116,509 | Not stored |
| 0x2bc1…864d | 1.97% | #130,116,511 | Not stored |
| 0xb2b1…827f | 1.93% | #130,116,058 | Not stored |
| 0xfc8e…8437 | 1.78% | #130,119,048 | Not stored |
| 0x2b05…c552 | Unknown | #130,117,078 | Not stored |
| 0x3dfe…3f7a | Unknown | #130,117,096 | Not stored |
| 0xb4c6…b956 | Unknown | #130,117,101 | Not stored |
| 0x4e01…86de | Unknown | #130,117,099 | Not stored |
| 0x27d0…1d15 | Unknown | #130,117,104 | Not stored |
| 0x360a…f1df | Unknown | #130,115,427 | 0xa4b7…27f8 |
| 0x6fbf…d188 | Unknown | #130,116,497 | Not stored |
| 0xf74e…d66c | Unknown | #130,115,677 | 0x2f39…d320 |
| 0x2e09…fb79 | Unknown | #130,115,697 | 0x1164…d6ea |
| 0xded2…8fb4 | Unknown | #130,115,939 | Not stored |
| 0x48cf…dc32 | Unknown | #130,115,951 | Not stored |
| 0x09c6…714d | Unknown | #130,115,954 | Not stored |
| 0xc477…7d8a | Unknown | #130,116,228 | Not stored |
| 0x7b92…4183 | Unknown | #130,116,228 | Not stored |
| 0x0e76…1a07 | Unknown | #130,115,310 | 0xa942…f053 |
| 0x1db0…5e50 | Unknown | #130,115,311 | 0x403a…9caf |
| 0xa543…487d | Unknown | #130,115,311 | 0xfe17…7aa5 |
| 0xc1b9…125b | Unknown | #130,117,968 | Not stored |
| 0xd6ce…c6a0 | Unknown | #130,115,311 | 0xa74f…f0ff |
| 0xf7d2…65db | Unknown | #130,115,311 | 0x253d…2f4b |
| 0x8dc4…ead7 | Unknown | #130,115,311 | 0x0a12…e27a |
| 0x0abf…fedf | Unknown | #130,115,311 | 0xb683…fe81 |
| 0x31b9…0c0a | Unknown | #130,115,311 | 0xf233…6c60 |
| 0x5510…b2e8 | Unknown | #130,115,311 | 0xb3af…f4da |
| 0xb2a0…3fc7 | Unknown | #130,115,311 | 0x1ef2…ab17 |
| 0xf498…7f34 | Unknown | #130,115,507 | 0x2bb0…5c23 |
| 0x44f8…f378 | Unknown | #130,115,507 | 0xd1a7…e391 |
| 0x6a08…9ecc | Unknown | #130,115,476 | 0x68f1…478b |
| 0x7179…47d3 | Unknown | #130,115,476 | 0x8bd7…9029 |
| 0x277d…489b | Unknown | #130,115,476 | 0xaa62…bf6c |
| 0xe3f0…7026 | Unknown | #130,116,201 | Not stored |
| 0xe1f9…12d1 | Unknown | #130,115,644 | 0xf888…fba4 |
| 0x3c8b…409e | Unknown | #130,115,312 | 0xbcbe…4d43 |
| 0x3c23…e96f | Unknown | #130,115,750 | 0xa819…6119 |
| 0x83d7…6d86 | Unknown | #130,115,750 | 0x6310…a7ac |
| 0x74d5…77c7 | Unknown | #130,115,805 | Not stored |
Source snapshot: . This evidence explorer does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict. Existing risk findings, verification gates and source timestamps remain authoritative.
RugGraph / Wallet intelligenceLinked-wallet graph31 wallets · 9 transaction references. Follow the receipts from saved launch evidence.Open wallet graph ↓
01 / Launch activity
Select a wallet to see its activity near token launch. Early receipt of tokens alone does not prove a sniper purchase.
Cyan: tokens received · Amber: tokens moved out · Dashed: deployment. Lines connect wallets to the launch sample; they do not identify who sent the tokens. The first 12 wallets are plotted; every listed wallet can be inspected below.
0x7543d73d57748643f0307b40007e8db19cfa2558
Creator attribution
Balance at last observation
Unknown
Time unavailable · observation, not a live balance
Creator balance history
2026-10-27 15:40:21 UTC · deployment block
Exact on-chain amounts
0 / 1000000000000000000000000000 raw units
Checkpoints show historical balances. A reduction does not establish a sale. Launching multiple tokens does not establish malicious intent.
02 / Funding connections
Where did the funding come from?
Follow verified transfers back up to three wallets. Select any connected wallet to explore its evidence.
Enhanced funding history is unavailable on this chain or snapshot. The saved report remains available above.
Evidence first. Ownership stays unproven.
A transfer proves funds moved between addresses. It does not prove they belong to the same person. Known exchange, bridge and pool accounts are marked as infrastructure.
How to read this evidence
Arrows show receipt references associated with the launch sample. They do not identify transfer counterparties or establish common ownership.
An early recipient is not necessarily a buyer or sniper. Outflows may be transfers; these summaries do not establish realized sales.
Balance measurements retain their original timestamps. Historical launch exposure is separate from present holdings.
Funding paths, verified swap activity and volume manipulation require additional transaction evidence. Missing history is unknown.
Source snapshot: 2026-10-29 08:29:16 UTC · Funding research runs only when requested.
Launch activity
Launch exposure, linked wallets and current holdingsNo Coordinated Launch Signal Observed
Module severity describes launch-pattern evidence and does not replace the overall Rug.Tools verdict.
Reconstructed from ERC-20 Transfer logs in the first 5,000 blocks after deployment. Initial distribution includes pools, lockers and other protocol contracts and is not evidence of insider control. Wallet exposure counts only non-contract recipients, and wallets are reported as coordinated only when they acquired supply in the same block.
Creator intelligence
Developer intelligenceDeveloper / Creator Intelligence
Creator attribution, current holdings, external creator facts and wallet-link evidence are correlated here without changing the canonical Rug.Tools verdict.
May refer to a different wallet or observation time. Reported exits do not establish verified sales or override measured on-chain holdings.
GMGN supplemental intelligence unavailable for this token right now
Historical creator balance: 0.00% of the supply at that time
At the end of the deployment block · 2026-10-27 15:40:21 UTC · block 130115006
A historical balance alone does not establish a sale, current ownership or a scam.
Wallet activity patterns detected
Launch and wallet-link signals were observed. Shared ownership and creator control are not established by this summary.
Inspect wallet links & supporting evidence▾
- • 12 wallets acquired in 2 same-block clusters
- • Verified creator wallet currently holds 0.00%
0x7543…fa2558 · verified attributionCoverage note: connected-wallet relationships are still loading.
Presentation-only · does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict
Liquidity & LP Protection
LiquidityLiquidity & LP Protection
Trading depth and LP ownership/lock evidence are grouped together. Liquidity depth describes trading conditions; LP protection describes whether liquidity ownership can be verified.
LP lock or burn protection has not been verified. Missing evidence does not mean liquidity is unlocked.
Ownership, protection & source evidence
No LP holder or lock data was returned for this token, so liquidity protection is Unknown rather than estimated. Unverified LP is a potential signal only and is not counted as evidence of a rug on its own.
Protection applies only to the measured pool or position; it does not establish overall token safety.
Contract & trading controls
ContractContract Controls
Direct contract and security-provider evidence. Unknown capabilities stay unknown and are never silently treated as safe.
Historical Pattern Review
Historical intelligence
Historical Pattern Review
Optional read-only comparison against archived launches and developer patterns. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Challenge this report with historical patterns
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Sources & coverage
Evidence quality
Analysis Coverage
Core report evidence and extended intelligence are separated so a complete core report cannot be confused with an unavailable optional launch-history module.
Usable evidence can be partial. These counts do not mean every contract permission, sell restriction or liquidity position was verified.