Elevated Risk
The token is actively trading, but the creator has a concerning launch history, and transfers can be paused by the owner.

“Several warning signs stacking up. I'd think twice.”
- •Owner can pause all transfers.
- •Ownership can be reclaimed after renouncement.
Challenge this report with historical patterns
Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.
Top wallet holdings look distributed (top-10 coverage), however owner can pause all transfers. Currently sits at $354.8K in liquidity, $82.9K traded in the last 24h, 714 holders. Supply is spread across many wallets (top holder 2.6%). The creator wallet is confirmed and holds less than 1% of supply.
Why this verdict?▾
- + ConcernContract SecurityOwner can pause transfers.
- + ConcernCreator HistoryCreator has a concerning launch history.
- NeutralLargest Individual WalletLargest wallet holds 2.6% — well distributed.
- NeutralTop 10 WalletsTop 10 wallets hold 13.0% — low concentration.
- NeutralSmart-Money Wallets: 2626 wallets tagged by GMGN as historically profitable currently hold this token. Popularity/track-record tags do not improve the Rug.Tools safety verdict.
- NeutralKOL / Renowned Wallets: 99 known-influencer/KOL wallets currently hold this token according to GMGN. This is market intelligence, not a safety credit.
- NeutralFresh Wallets: 726726 wallets are tagged by GMGN as fresh. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralBot Wallets: 255255 wallets are tagged by GMGN as automated/bot wallets. No trusted comparable holder denominator is supplied here, so this count is informational only.
- NeutralLiquidityLiquidity depth looks reasonable ($354,757).
- NeutralProject LifecycleProject is actively trading on-chain.
Sum of the top 10 currently-classified individual wallets. LPs, lockers, bridges, exchanges and known contracts are excluded. Bare wallets that we haven't fingerprinted may still be exchange or team wallets.
Module statuses describe only that evidence area and never override the Overall Verdict.
On-Chain Contract ChecksDirect on-chain reads complete · third-party security screening unavailable on Robinhood▾Concerning
- ›Owner can pause all transfers
- ›Ownership can be reclaimed
- ›Third-party security screening unavailable on Robinhood — honeypot, tax and provider-only privilege checks are not available on this chain
- ›Source verification not available from the current Blockscout evidence
- ›Tax screening not available on Robinhood
- ›Not a proxy contract (EIP-1967 slot empty)
Holder ConcentrationLargest individual wallet holds 2.64%▾Low Concentration
- ›Liquidity pool holds 64.56% (excluded from concentration)
- ›64.56% — DEX Pool
- ›2.64% — 0x194d…ff23
- ›1.84% — 0xa275…dc27
- ›1.73% — 0xf5a6…a617
LiquidityLiquidity depth looks reasonable▾Adequate Depth
- ›Total liquidity: $354,757
- ›LP data unavailable
- ›Primary venue: Uniswap V2
CreatorCreator holds less than 1% of supply▾Favorable Creator Signal
- ›Address: 0xe936…d950
- ›Source unknown
- ›Deployed 2 month(s) ago
- ›Creator wallet age unknown
- ›Creator wallet has sent 119,476 transactions
- ›Ownership can be reclaimed
Market Snapshot
Key Findings
🟠 Elevated Risk- ✓On-Chain Contract Checks
- ✓Market data (DexScreener)
- ✓Holder distribution
- ✓Creator intelligence
- ○LP ownership · LP lock status could not be determined from available data
- ✓Token identity
- ✓Liquidity depth
Confidence reflects verified evidence coverage and evidence quality — not how safe the token is. Evidence Coverage counts resolved checklist items; it is not a second safety verdict.
LP lock detection is not available on Robinhood yet. Liquidity protection is shown as Not verified and never estimated; missing data is not treated as a risk signal.
No Coordinated Risk Signals
Reconstructed from ERC-20 Transfer logs in the first 5,000 blocks after deployment. Initial distribution includes pools, lockers and other protocol contracts and is not evidence of insider control. Wallet exposure counts only non-contract recipients, and wallets are reported as coordinated only when they acquired supply in the same block.

Connected Wallet Intelligence
Reading cached wallet relationships…
