RUG.TOOLS
Feels Good Man$FEELSGOOD
Risk analysis for Feels Good Man (FEELSGOOD) on Ethereum — contract 0xff276589ae94ee7d74aa4676ed3c0fe24f98ea44. Covers liquidity, holder concentration, creator activity and available contract security signals, with unavailable checks shown as unavailable.
Scanned 2026-10-29 18:21 UTC
- 1.Project Lifecycle
Trading activity or liquidity is weakening.
Why it matters: Weakening activity or liquidity can impair exits; deterioration alone is not proof of deliberate fraud.
- 2.Liquidity
Low liquidity ($15,791) — expect slippage. Trading risk only.
Why it matters: Limited available liquidity can make large trades expensive or difficult to exit; a market quote is not proof of LP protection.
- 3.Reported liquidity depth
$15,790.98 in tracked liquidity in the recorded market snapshot.
Why it matters: Trading depth affects slippage and exit difficulty. Market-reported liquidity does not establish a verified LP lock or current executable quote.
See 2 additional recorded findings
- 4. Top 10 individual wallet concentration
The reported top 10 individual wallets hold 9.18% of supply, using the report's holder classification and coverage.
Why it matters: Concentration can increase potential sell pressure. Wallet addresses do not establish distinct beneficial owners or independent control.
- 5. Creator wallet holdings
The identified creator wallet has 0.00% of supply in the recorded balance observation.
Why it matters: This measures the identified wallet only; it does not prove related-wallet holdings, creator intent, or future sales.
Reliability & unknowns
Low confidence describes evidence coverage, quality and freshness, not token safety. checks incomplete.
• Required verification checks are incomplete; category availability does not establish completed verification.
• The report evidence is stale or its observation time is invalid; confidence is limited.
• 0/2 launch-wallet balances measured; 2 remain unknown. Present group holdings are not fully measured.
LP protection: not verified. Wallet attribution and independent control require separate evidence.
Technical snapshot
Trading indicators and observed activity
Technical snapshot
Market structure, order flow and published on-chain evidence from one chain-specific snapshot.
Available depth relative to valuation
24h volume divided by liquidity
Transaction split unavailable
Across 1h, 6h and 24h returns
How to read these technicals
Turnover measures trading activity against available liquidity. High turnover can also mean volatility.
Momentum alignment compares overlapping return windows. It is context, not independent confirmation or a safety score.
Holder concentration uses the published report’s classified holder evidence when available.
Freshness is the age of Rug.Tools’ indexed market snapshot, separate from the report scan time.
Price chart
Price chart
Price chart
Load verified candle history to explore price and volume directly in this report.
Market overview
Market overview
Market data provider unavailable — showing last verified values from 23 hours ago.
Market data
Trading activity
Markets & liquidity pools
Markets & liquidity pools
Primary indexed pool
0xa0dca05f8a6b503ac1fedde890bc119f1f9c4b625c43e22186fe27a4e87059f6The page opens from Rug.Tools’ indexed snapshot. Load the full pool list only when you need a live provider check.
What is Feels Good Man?
What is Feels Good Man?
Feels Good Man ($FEELSGOOD) is a ERC-20 token on the Ethereum blockchain Its primary trading venue is uniswap, with roughly $15.79K in live on-chain liquidity. It currently has 19 on-chain holders, and was first traded 1 month old. Rug.Tools' current assessment of Feels Good Man is "Use Caution", based on live on-chain signals including holder concentration, liquidity depth, creator wallet history and contract permissions.
Rug.Tools signals
Rug.Tools signals
Key statistics
Key statistics
Launch activity
Native receipt, wallet and liquidity custody evidenceNative evidence explorer
Launch, wallet flows & liquidity custody
Inspect what was observed, which balances were measured, and what remains unverified. Timing and transfers alone do not establish common ownership or a sale.
Investigate creator trades & token transfers
Forensic intelligence / Activity
What did the developer actually do?
Separate current holdings, historical launch exposure, verified sales and token transfers. Follow the receipts before drawing conclusions.
- Creator holdings
- 0.00%
- Historical launch exposure
- Unknown
Saved balance measurement; separate from sale history
Observed launch-group share of total token supply; not every graph node, developer sales or present insider ownership
Developer sales: Insufficient Evidence · Trading integrity: Not Scored. A creator holding 0% does not establish whether tokens were sold or transferred.
Launch evidence
16 observed recipients
58 receipts examined
Current cohort balances
Unknown
0/2 wallets measured · 2 unknown
Custody coverage
1 custody accounts / markets
1 without verified protection
Token custody and LP withdrawal protection are separate checks.
Creator provenance
0xc933…6323 · 0.00% current measured holdings
Attribution: routescan-contract-creation. Identified wallet only; this does not establish total team ownership.
Deployment receipt: 0x209e…fc18
Launch timeline & receipt references
Anchor block #26,007,665 · observed through #26,012,664 · Reconstruction captured:
| From anchor | Recipients | Net inflow / supply | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| +0 blocks | 1 | 0.00% | Verified interval |
| +2 blocks | 1 | 0.00% | Verified interval |
| +5 blocks | 1 | 0.00% | Verified interval |
| +10 blocks | 1 | 0.00% | Verified interval |
Intervals include the anchor through the stated offset. Net inflows are token movements recorded in those receipts, divided by supply measured at replay time; they are not confirmed purchases or current holdings. Partial replay may omit inflows or outflows. Historical values are not clamped into ownership claims.
- 0x209e…fc18 · #26,007,665
- 0x0252…bad7 · #26,007,667
- 0xba35…6e43 · #26,010,120
- 0xa07f…af7b · #26,010,121
- 0x9329…adcb · #26,010,125
- 0x2935…c818 · #26,010,128
- 0x632a…27f8 · #26,010,129
- 0x5bd4…2022 · #26,010,131
- 0x39bc…1cbc · #26,010,205
- 0x1ebf…3de7 · #26,010,211
- 0xa4ab…578d · #26,010,264
- 0xfc87…fc4f · #26,010,264
- 0x0130…13da · #26,010,267
- 0x1ed5…bc4b · #26,010,267
- 0x4d6e…3178 · #26,010,269
- 0xa2e5…03bf · #26,010,269
Pool-by-pool custody & protection
90.52% of token supply in custody · native custody evidence
A shared PoolManager holds tokens for multiple positions. Its balance does not identify this pool's position owners or lock protection.
Measured wallet balances & transfer evidence
A measured zero balance does not prove a sale. Unknown balances are not zero. Only 2 stored sample rows are listed; aggregate coverage includes missing rows.
| Recipient | Current balance | First position | Receipt references |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0x44d1…07b2 | Unknown | #26,010,120 | 0xba35…6e43 |
| 0x724d…6592 | Unknown | #26,010,269 | 0x4d6e…3178 |
Source snapshot: . This evidence explorer does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict. Existing risk findings, verification gates and source timestamps remain authoritative.
RugGraph / Wallet intelligenceLinked-wallet graph3 wallets · 3 transaction references. Follow the receipts from saved launch evidence.Open wallet graph ↓
01 / Launch activity
Select a wallet to see its activity near token launch. Early receipt of tokens alone does not prove a sniper purchase.
Cyan: tokens received · Amber: tokens moved out · Dashed: deployment. Lines connect wallets to the launch sample; they do not identify who sent the tokens.
0xc9339cca06c46118f647c119a54c18de9d346323
Creator attribution
Balance at last observation
Unknown
Time unavailable · observation, not a live balance
Creator balance history
2026-09-18 23:25:35 UTC · deployment block
Exact on-chain amounts
0 / 1000000000000000000000000000 raw units
Checkpoints show historical balances. A reduction does not establish a sale. Launching multiple tokens does not establish malicious intent.
02 / Funding connections
Where did the funding come from?
Follow verified transfers back up to three wallets. Select any connected wallet to explore its evidence.
Evidence first. Ownership stays unproven.
A transfer proves funds moved between addresses. It does not prove they belong to the same person. Known exchange, bridge and pool accounts are marked as infrastructure.
How to read this evidence
Arrows show receipt references associated with the launch sample. They do not identify transfer counterparties or establish common ownership.
An early recipient is not necessarily a buyer or sniper. Outflows may be transfers; these summaries do not establish realized sales.
Balance measurements retain their original timestamps. Historical launch exposure is separate from present holdings.
Funding paths, verified swap activity and volume manipulation require additional transaction evidence. Missing history is unknown.
Source snapshot: 2026-10-29 18:21:22 UTC · Funding research runs only when requested.
Rug.Tools analysis
Rug.Tools analysis
Multiple health signals are weakening, and liquidity is relatively low, so expect slippage when trading.
Verdict from canonical snapshot cbaa7a91 · v3 · scanned 2026-10-29 18:21 UTC · page content updated 2026-10-29 18:21 UTC
Holder distribution
Holder distribution
Creator profile
Creator profile
0xc9339cca06c46118f647c119a54c18de9d346323Full creator history is currently Solana-only. Multi-chain creator profiles are coming soon.
Token activity
Token activity
- 2026-09-18 23:25 UTCToken launchedFirst on-chain trading pair opened on uniswap.
- 2026-10-29 18:21 UTCRug.Tools analyzed this tokenFresh on-chain snapshot captured.
Similar tokens
Similar tokens
Compared using stored market cap, launch age and trading venue. Similarity is not a safety rating.
Finding comparable tokens…
Learn more
Frequently asked questions
Frequently asked questions
What is Feels Good Man?⌄
Feels Good Man is a Ethereum token analyzed by Rug.Tools using public on-chain data — holders, liquidity, creator wallet activity and contract security signals. This page shows the latest cached analysis and refreshes automatically.
Is Feels Good Man safe?⌄
Current Rug.Tools verdict: Use Caution. Multiple health signals are weakening, and liquidity is relatively low, so expect slippage when trading. No token can be guaranteed safe: verdicts summarize on-chain risk signals only and cannot detect off-chain intent. Always do your own research.
How many holders does Feels Good Man have?⌄
Rug.Tools currently sees 19 holders. The largest holder account holds 1.51% of supply; the top 10 holder accounts together hold 9.18%. These balances alone do not establish individual ownership or independent control.
Where is Feels Good Man traded?⌄
The primary trading venue detected on Ethereum is uniswap. Review the market and liquidity evidence below; trading venue availability does not establish token safety.
How often does this page update?⌄
This page renders from cached data in our database. It refreshes when a new scan runs — either on a scheduled background sync or when a user clicks Refresh above. Opening this page does not trigger a new scan.