RUG.TOOLS
DeepNode logo
Ethereumrugged

DeepNode$DN

Risk analysis for DeepNode (DN) on Ethereum — contract 0x9b6a1d4fa5d90e5f2d34130053978d14cd301d58. Covers liquidity, holder concentration, creator activity and available contract security signals, with unavailable checks shown as unavailable.

Market Collapse
Low ConfidenceRisk score 100
0x9b6a…1d58 Explorer Risk report 29d ago Market snapshot 29d ago
Price
$0.1506
Market Cap
$3.39M
Liquidity
$123
24h Volume
$13.08
Holders
128
View risk analysis
Rug.Tools Risk Assessment
Market Collapse
Low confidenceScore 100
Canonical report ed80cdf6 · v3
Scanned 2026-10-01 01:41 UTC
Red Flags · Ranked by Importance
  1. 1.CRITICAL RED FLAG · Project Lifecycle

    Liquidity or market activity has collapsed. Lifecycle evidence alone does not confirm deliberate liquidity removal.

    Why it matters: Weakening activity or liquidity can impair exits; deterioration alone is not proof of deliberate fraud.

  2. 2.Unclassified Contract Concentration

    An unclassified contract holds 63.73% of supply. Its purpose and control remain unverified.

    Why it matters: Review the underlying recorded evidence; this does not establish malicious intent.

  3. 3.Contract Security

    Owner can pause transfers, mint new supply.

    Why it matters: Contract privileges or transfer rules can change trading conditions. Review the verified capability and its limitations.

See 4 additional recorded findings
  1. 4. Liquidity

    Very thin liquidity ($123) — a trading risk (heavy slippage), not proof of a scam.

    Why it matters: Limited available liquidity can make large trades expensive or difficult to exit; a market quote is not proof of LP protection.

  2. 5. Reported liquidity depth

    $122.59 in tracked liquidity in the recorded market snapshot.

    Why it matters: Trading depth affects slippage and exit difficulty. Market-reported liquidity does not establish a verified LP lock or current executable quote.

  3. 6. Top 10 individual wallet concentration

    The reported top 10 individual wallets hold <0.01% of supply, using the report's holder classification and coverage.

    Why it matters: Concentration can increase potential sell pressure. Wallet addresses do not establish distinct beneficial owners or independent control.

  4. 7. Creator wallet holdings

    The identified creator wallet has 0.00% of supply in the recorded balance observation.

    Why it matters: This measures the identified wallet only; it does not prove related-wallet holdings, creator intent, or future sales.

Reliability & unknowns

Low confidence describes evidence coverage, quality and freshness, not token safety. checks incomplete.

• Required verification checks are incomplete; category availability does not establish completed verification.

• The report evidence is stale or its observation time is invalid; confidence is limited.

LP protection: not verified. Wallet attribution and independent control require separate evidence.

Top 10 sampled holders · Low Concentration
<0.01%
Creator holdings
0.00%
Liquidity
$123
LP evidence
Unknown
View complete evidence Market data cannot change this canonical verdict.
Price
$0.1506
Market cap
$3.39M
Liquidity
$123
24h volume
$13.08
Holders
128
Primary pool age
9 months old

Explore the evidence

Technical snapshot

Trading indicators and observed activity
Indexed intelligence

Technical snapshot

Market structure, order flow and published on-chain evidence from one chain-specific snapshot.

Stale · 42709m
Liquidity / market cap
0.00%

Available depth relative to valuation

24h turnover
0.11×

24h volume divided by liquidity

Buy flow · 24h
Unavailable

Transaction split unavailable

Momentum alignment
0/3 available

Across 1h, 6h and 24h returns

Return windowsPrice performance
1 hour
—
6 hours
—
24 hours
—
Evidence sets
5/5
Pool age
9 months old
Top holder
<0.01%
Top 10
<0.01%
How to read these technicals

Turnover measures trading activity against available liquidity. High turnover can also mean volatility.

Momentum alignment compares overlapping return windows. It is context, not independent confirmation or a safety score.

Holder concentration uses the published report’s classified holder evidence when available.

Freshness is the age of Rug.Tools’ indexed market snapshot, separate from the report scan time.

Price chart

Price chart

Price chart

Open on DexScreener ↗

Load verified candle history to explore price and volume directly in this report.

Market overview

Market overview

Rug.Tools indexed snapshot
5 min
—
1 hour
—
6 hours
—
24 hours
—

Market data

Price (USD)$0.1506
Market cap$3.39M
Fully diluted valuation$9.34M
Circulating supply22.51MDN
Total liquidity$122.59
Liquidity / market cap0.00%

Trading activity

Volume · 24h$13.08
Volume · 6h—
Volume · 1h—
Volume / market cap (24h)0.00%
Transactions · 24h—
Buys vs sells · 24h—

Markets & liquidity pools

Markets & liquidity pools

Primary indexed pool

uniswap0x4bbd3545727c30f2a670db5579e5ad72066f255991179f1ff21ca1c67d8fd158

The page opens from Rug.Tools’ indexed snapshot. Load the full pool list only when you need a live provider check.

DexScreener

What is DeepNode?

What is DeepNode?

DeepNode ($DN) is a ERC-20 token on the Ethereum blockchain Its primary trading venue is uniswap, with roughly $123 in live on-chain liquidity. It currently has 128 on-chain holders, and was first traded 9 months old. Rug.Tools' current assessment of DeepNode is "Market Collapse", based on live on-chain signals including holder concentration, liquidity depth, creator wallet history and contract permissions.

Rug.Tools signals

Rug.Tools signals

Creator Trust
—
Solana only
Creator Holdings
0.00%
Of total supply
Contract
Unverified
Mint authority live
Liquidity
LP Unknown
on uniswap

Key statistics

Key statistics

Price
$0.1506
Market Cap
$3.39M
FDV
$9.34M
Liquidity
$123
24h Volume
$13.08
Holders
128
Primary pool age
9 months old
Top Holder
<0.01%
Top 10 Holders
<0.01%
Total Supply
—
Primary DEX
uniswap
Chain
Ethereum

Launch activity

Native receipt, wallet and liquidity custody evidence

Native evidence explorer

Launch, wallet flows & liquidity custody

Inspect what was observed, which balances were measured, and what remains unverified. Timing and transfers alone do not establish common ownership or a sale.

ethereum
Investigate creator trades & token transfers

Forensic intelligence / Activity

What did the developer actually do?

Separate current holdings, historical launch exposure, verified sales and token transfers. Follow the receipts before drawing conclusions.

Trade history unavailable
Creator holdings
0.00%

Saved balance measurement; separate from sale history

Historical launch exposure
Unknown

Observed launch-group share of total token supply; not every graph node, developer sales or present insider ownership

Developer sales: Insufficient Evidence · Trading integrity: Not Scored. A creator holding 0% does not establish whether tokens were sold or transferred.

Launch evidence

0 stored cohort rows

Unknown

Receipt-level replay was not stored for this snapshot.

Current cohort balances

Unknown

Recipient cohort not recorded

Custody coverage

0 custody accounts / markets

0 without verified protection

Token custody and LP withdrawal protection are separate checks.

Creator provenance

0x40e0…59be · 0.00% current measured holdings

Attribution: rpc-creation-trace. Identified wallet only; this does not establish total team ownership.

Deployment receipt: 0xcb24…40ca

Launch timeline & receipt references
First 10 recipients: Unknown
First 20 recipients: Unknown
First 10 elapsed: Unknown

This older snapshot contains a recipient cohort, not the full receipt timeline. Counts and timing describe only the stored sample. Exact interval supply figures and transaction references remain unknown until a bounded native replay records them.

Pool-by-pool custody & protection

No position-level custody evidence is stored. This does not establish that liquidity is absent or protected.

Measured wallet balances & transfer evidence

A measured zero balance does not prove a sale. Unknown balances are not zero. Only 0 stored sample rows are listed; aggregate coverage includes missing rows.

RecipientCurrent balanceFirst positionReceipt references

Source snapshot: . This evidence explorer does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict. Existing risk findings, verification gates and source timestamps remain authoritative.

1Choose a wallet
2Inspect its transactions
3Trace its funding
Historical launch-group exposure
Unknown
Wallet coverage
Saved wallet sample
Creator history
0 balance snapshots
Evidence status
History unavailable

01 / Launch activity

Select a wallet to see its activity near token launch. Early receipt of tokens alone does not prove a sniper purchase.

LAUNCHreceipt sampleCREATOR0x40e…59be

Cyan: tokens received · Amber: tokens moved out · Dashed: deployment. Lines connect wallets to the launch sample; they do not identify who sent the tokens.

Selected wallet

0x40e0400d7f4cb921635bf241b7ea0af4914d59be

Creator attribution

Balance at last observation

Unknown

Time unavailable · observation, not a live balance

Supporting transactions (1)

02 / Funding connections

Where did the funding come from?

Follow verified transfers back up to three wallets. Select any connected wallet to explore its evidence.

Evidence first. Ownership stays unproven.

A transfer proves funds moved between addresses. It does not prove they belong to the same person. Known exchange, bridge and pool accounts are marked as infrastructure.

How to read this evidence

Arrows show receipt references associated with the launch sample. They do not identify transfer counterparties or establish common ownership.

An early recipient is not necessarily a buyer or sniper. Outflows may be transfers; these summaries do not establish realized sales.

Balance measurements retain their original timestamps. Historical launch exposure is separate from present holdings.

Funding paths, verified swap activity and volume manipulation require additional transaction evidence. Missing history is unknown.

Source snapshot: 2026-10-01 01:41:36 UTC · Funding research runs only when requested.

Rug.Tools analysis

Rug.Tools analysis

Ruggy verdict
Market Collapse
Low confidence

Liquidity or market activity has collapsed. This lifecycle signal alone does not confirm a liquidity drain.

Verdict from canonical snapshot ed80cdf6 · v3 · scanned 2026-10-01 01:41 UTC · page content updated 2026-10-01 01:41 UTC

Holder distribution

Holder distribution

Total holders
128
Top 1 wallet
<0.01%
Top 2-10 wallets
<0.01%
Everyone else
100.00%

Creator profile

Creator profile

Creator wallet
0x40e0400d7f4cb921635bf241b7ea0af4914d59be
View wallet
Trust Score
—
Holdings
0.00%
Projects
—
Active
—
Inactive
—
High Risk
—

Full creator history is currently Solana-only. Multi-chain creator profiles are coming soon.

Token activity

Token activity

  1. 2026-01-22 15:06 UTC
    Token launched
    First on-chain trading pair opened on uniswap.
  2. 2026-10-01 01:41 UTC
    Rug.Tools analyzed this token
    Fresh on-chain snapshot captured.

Similar tokens

Similar tokens

Compared using stored market cap, launch age and trading venue. Similarity is not a safety rating.

Finding comparable tokens…

Learn more

Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is DeepNode?⌄

DeepNode is a Ethereum token analyzed by Rug.Tools using public on-chain data — holders, liquidity, creator wallet activity and contract security signals. This page shows the latest cached analysis and refreshes automatically.

Is DeepNode safe?⌄

Current Rug.Tools verdict: Market Collapse. Liquidity or market activity has collapsed. This lifecycle signal alone does not confirm a liquidity drain. No token can be guaranteed safe: verdicts summarize on-chain risk signals only and cannot detect off-chain intent. Always do your own research.

How many holders does DeepNode have?⌄

Rug.Tools currently sees 128 holders. The largest holder account holds <0.01% of supply; the top 10 holder accounts together hold <0.01%. These balances alone do not establish individual ownership or independent control.

Where is DeepNode traded?⌄

The primary trading venue detected on Ethereum is uniswap. Review the market and liquidity evidence below; trading venue availability does not establish token safety.

How often does this page update?⌄

This page renders from cached data in our database. It refreshes when a new scan runs — either on a scheduled background sync or when a user clicks Refresh above. Opening this page does not trigger a new scan.

Optional Forensic Review

Challenge this report with historical patterns

Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.