RUG.TOOLS
Underdog Saluki logo
BNB Chainactive

Underdog Saluki$Saluki

Risk analysis for Underdog Saluki (Saluki) on BNB Chain — contract 0x2da9dc075134366b31e2f44bb637f99376c37777. Covers liquidity, holder concentration, creator activity and available contract security signals, with unavailable checks shown as unavailable.

Rugged / Dead
Low ConfidenceRisk score 100
0x2da9…7777 Explorer Risk report 22d ago Market snapshot 22d ago
Price
$0.00002463
▼ 8.95%
Market Cap
$24.63K
Liquidity
$13.33K
24h Volume
$149.04K
Holders
338
View risk analysis
Rug.Tools Risk Assessment
Rugged / Dead
Low confidenceScore 100
Canonical report 709c8138 · v3
Scanned 2026-10-08 13:28 UTC
Red Flags · Ranked by Importance
  1. 1.CRITICAL RED FLAG · Contract Security

    Honeypot — buyers cannot sell.

    Why it matters: Restrictions on selling directly affect whether holders can exit; verify the exact tested route and observation time.

  2. 2.Unclassified Contract Concentration

    An unclassified contract holds 28.47% of supply. Its purpose and control remain unverified.

    Why it matters: Review the underlying recorded evidence; this does not establish malicious intent.

  3. 3.Liquidity

    Low liquidity ($13,328) — expect slippage. Trading risk only.

    Why it matters: Limited available liquidity can make large trades expensive or difficult to exit; a market quote is not proof of LP protection.

See 3 additional recorded findings
  1. 4. Reported liquidity depth

    $13,327.75 in tracked liquidity in the recorded market snapshot.

    Why it matters: Trading depth affects slippage and exit difficulty. Market-reported liquidity does not establish a verified LP lock or current executable quote.

  2. 5. Top 10 individual wallet concentration

    The reported top 10 individual wallets hold 13.17% of supply, using the report's holder classification and coverage.

    Why it matters: Concentration can increase potential sell pressure. Wallet addresses do not establish distinct beneficial owners or independent control.

  3. 6. Creator wallet holdings

    The identified creator wallet has 0.00% of supply in the recorded balance observation.

    Why it matters: This measures the identified wallet only; it does not prove related-wallet holdings, creator intent, or future sales.

Reliability & unknowns

Low confidence describes evidence coverage, quality and freshness, not token safety. checks incomplete.

• Required verification checks are incomplete; category availability does not establish completed verification.

• The report evidence is stale or its observation time is invalid; confidence is limited.

LP protection: not verified. Wallet attribution and independent control require separate evidence.

Top 10 sampled holders · Low Concentration
13.17%
Creator holdings
0.00%
Liquidity
$13.33K
LP evidence
Unknown
View complete evidence Market data cannot change this canonical verdict.
Price
$0.00002463
Market cap
$24.63K
Liquidity
$13.33K
24h volume
$149.04K
Holders
338
Primary pool age
22 days old

Explore the evidence

Technical snapshot

Trading indicators and observed activity
Indexed intelligence

Technical snapshot

Market structure, order flow and published on-chain evidence from one chain-specific snapshot.

Stale · 31927m
Liquidity / market cap
54.10%

Available depth relative to valuation

24h turnover
11.18×

24h volume divided by liquidity

Buy flow · 24h
Unavailable

Transaction split unavailable

Momentum alignment
1/3 available

Across 1h, 6h and 24h returns

Return windowsPrice performance
1 hour
—
6 hours
—
24 hours
-8.95%
Evidence sets
5/5
Pool age
22 days old
Top holder
2.17%
Top 10
13.17%
How to read these technicals

Turnover measures trading activity against available liquidity. High turnover can also mean volatility.

Momentum alignment compares overlapping return windows. It is context, not independent confirmation or a safety score.

Holder concentration uses the published report’s classified holder evidence when available.

Freshness is the age of Rug.Tools’ indexed market snapshot, separate from the report scan time.

Price chart

Price chart

Price chart

Open on DexScreener ↗

Load verified candle history to explore price and volume directly in this report.

Market overview

Market overview

Rug.Tools indexed snapshot
5 min
—
1 hour
—
6 hours
—
24 hours
-8.95%

Market data

Price (USD)$0.00002463
Market cap$24.63K
Fully diluted valuation$24.63K
Circulating supply1BSaluki
Total liquidity$13.33K
Liquidity / market cap54.10%

Trading activity

Volume · 24h$149.04K
Volume · 6h—
Volume · 1h—
Volume / market cap (24h)605.02%
Transactions · 24h—
Buys vs sells · 24h—

Markets & liquidity pools

Markets & liquidity pools

Primary indexed pool

pancakeswap0xBac663fb1625efd387359112A334C7Dbd946dbD8

The page opens from Rug.Tools’ indexed snapshot. Load the full pool list only when you need a live provider check.

DexScreener

What is Underdog Saluki?

What is Underdog Saluki?

Underdog Saluki ($Saluki) is a BEP-20 token on the BNB Chain blockchain Its primary trading venue is pancakeswap, with roughly $13.33K in live on-chain liquidity. It currently has 338 on-chain holders, and was first traded 22 days old. Rug.Tools' current assessment of Underdog Saluki is "Rugged / Dead", based on live on-chain signals including holder concentration, liquidity depth, creator wallet history and contract permissions.

Rug.Tools signals

Rug.Tools signals

Creator Trust
—
Solana only
Creator Holdings
0.00%
Of total supply
Contract
Unverified
Honeypot flag ⚠
Liquidity
LP Unknown
on pancakeswap

Key statistics

Key statistics

Price
$0.00002463
Market Cap
$24.63K
FDV
$24.63K
Liquidity
$13.33K
24h Volume
$149.04K
Holders
338
Primary pool age
22 days old
Top Holder
2.17%
Top 10 Holders
13.17%
Total Supply
—
Primary DEX
pancakeswap
Chain
BNB Chain

Launch activity

Native receipt, wallet and liquidity custody evidence

Native evidence explorer

Launch, wallet flows & liquidity custody

Inspect what was observed, which balances were measured, and what remains unverified. Timing and transfers alone do not establish common ownership or a sale.

bnb
Investigate creator trades & token transfers

Forensic intelligence / Activity

What did the developer actually do?

Separate current holdings, historical launch exposure, verified sales and token transfers. Follow the receipts before drawing conclusions.

Trade history unavailable
Creator holdings
0.00%

Saved balance measurement; separate from sale history

Historical launch exposure
Unknown

Observed launch-group share of total token supply; not every graph node, developer sales or present insider ownership

Developer sales: Insufficient Evidence · Trading integrity: Not Scored. A creator holding 0% does not establish whether tokens were sold or transferred.

Launch evidence

0 stored cohort rows

Unknown

Receipt-level replay was not stored for this snapshot.

Current cohort balances

Unknown

Recipient cohort not recorded

Custody coverage

1 custody accounts / markets

1 without verified protection

Token custody and LP withdrawal protection are separate checks.

Creator provenance

0x79b9…4e06 · 0.00% current measured holdings

Attribution: rpc-creation-trace. Identified wallet only; this does not establish total team ownership.

Deployment receipt: 0x3d0a…85ac

Launch timeline & receipt references
First 10 recipients: Unknown
First 20 recipients: Unknown
First 10 elapsed: Unknown

This older snapshot contains a recipient cohort, not the full receipt timeline. Counts and timing describe only the stored sample. Exact interval supply figures and transaction references remain unknown until a bounded native replay records them.

Pool-by-pool custody & protection
Selected market · 0xbac6…dbd8
Position protection unverified

Pool allocation not established · reported role / market

Market selection alone does not verify LP ownership, locks or the controller of this pool.

Measured wallet balances & transfer evidence

A measured zero balance does not prove a sale. Unknown balances are not zero. Only 0 stored sample rows are listed; aggregate coverage includes missing rows.

RecipientCurrent balanceFirst positionReceipt references

Source snapshot: . This evidence explorer does not independently change the Rug.Tools verdict. Existing risk findings, verification gates and source timestamps remain authoritative.

1Choose a wallet
2Inspect its transactions
3Trace its funding
Historical launch-group exposure
Unknown
Wallet coverage
Saved wallet sample
Creator history
0 balance snapshots
Evidence status
History unavailable

01 / Launch activity

Select a wallet to see its activity near token launch. Early receipt of tokens alone does not prove a sniper purchase.

LAUNCHreceipt sampleCREATOR0x79b…4e06

Cyan: tokens received · Amber: tokens moved out · Dashed: deployment. Lines connect wallets to the launch sample; they do not identify who sent the tokens.

Selected wallet

0x79b91b923bcc80bfd20274fdeec1eb3f6a1e4e06

Creator attribution

Balance at last observation

Unknown

Time unavailable · observation, not a live balance

Supporting transactions (1)

02 / Funding connections

Where did the funding come from?

Follow verified transfers back up to three wallets. Select any connected wallet to explore its evidence.

History unavailable

Enhanced funding history is unavailable on this chain or snapshot. The saved report remains available above.

Evidence first. Ownership stays unproven.

A transfer proves funds moved between addresses. It does not prove they belong to the same person. Known exchange, bridge and pool accounts are marked as infrastructure.

How to read this evidence

Arrows show receipt references associated with the launch sample. They do not identify transfer counterparties or establish common ownership.

An early recipient is not necessarily a buyer or sniper. Outflows may be transfers; these summaries do not establish realized sales.

Balance measurements retain their original timestamps. Historical launch exposure is separate from present holdings.

Funding paths, verified swap activity and volume manipulation require additional transaction evidence. Missing history is unknown.

Source snapshot: 2026-10-08 13:28:16 UTC · Funding research runs only when requested.

Rug.Tools analysis

Rug.Tools analysis

Ruggy verdict
Rugged / Dead
Low confidence

The contract behaves like a honeypot — buyers cannot exit. Do not trade.

Verdict from canonical snapshot 709c8138 · v3 · scanned 2026-10-08 13:28 UTC · page content updated 2026-10-08 13:28 UTC

Holder distribution

Holder distribution

Total holders
338
Top 1 wallet
2.17%
Top 2-10 wallets
11.00%
Everyone else
86.83%

Creator profile

Creator profile

Creator wallet
0x79b91b923bcc80bfd20274fdeec1eb3f6a1e4e06
View wallet
Trust Score
—
Holdings
0.00%
Projects
—
Active
—
Inactive
—
High Risk
—

Full creator history is currently Solana-only. Multi-chain creator profiles are coming soon.

Token activity

Token activity

  1. 2026-10-08 13:19 UTC
    Token launched
    First on-chain trading pair opened on pancakeswap.
  2. 2026-10-08 13:28 UTC
    Rug.Tools analyzed this token
    Fresh on-chain snapshot captured.

Similar tokens

Similar tokens

Compared using stored market cap, launch age and trading venue. Similarity is not a safety rating.

Finding comparable tokens…

Learn more

Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Underdog Saluki?⌄

Underdog Saluki is a BNB Chain token analyzed by Rug.Tools using public on-chain data — holders, liquidity, creator wallet activity and contract security signals. This page shows the latest cached analysis and refreshes automatically.

Is Underdog Saluki safe?⌄

Current Rug.Tools verdict: Rugged / Dead. The contract behaves like a honeypot — buyers cannot exit. Do not trade. No token can be guaranteed safe: verdicts summarize on-chain risk signals only and cannot detect off-chain intent. Always do your own research.

How many holders does Underdog Saluki have?⌄

Rug.Tools currently sees 338 holders. The largest holder account holds 2.17% of supply; the top 10 holder accounts together hold 13.17%. These balances alone do not establish individual ownership or independent control.

Where is Underdog Saluki traded?⌄

The primary trading venue detected on BNB Chain is pancakeswap. Review the market and liquidity evidence below; trading venue availability does not establish token safety.

How often does this page update?⌄

This page renders from cached data in our database. It refreshes when a new scan runs — either on a scheduled background sync or when a user clicks Refresh above. Opening this page does not trigger a new scan.

Optional Forensic Review

Challenge this report with historical patterns

Runs only when you ask. It compares stored launch and developer patterns and may add an AI adversarial review. It never changes the Rug.Tools verdict or risk score.